Archived daily edition
Welcome. On your next visit, NEW badges highlight picks added since you last read.
- 012017pts1125comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 2017 points and 1125 comments. The source actually reported 2017 points and 1125 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 2017 points · 1125 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 14 comments - 02997pts419comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 997 points and 419 comments. The source actually reported 1092 points and 459 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1092 points · 459 comments → ·
- 03333pts337comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 333 points and 337 comments. The source actually reported 945 points and 956 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 945 points · 956 comments → ·
- 04222pts154comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 222 points and 154 comments. The source actually reported 884 points and 613 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 884 points · 613 comments → ·
- 05247pts231comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 247 points and 231 comments. The source actually reported 585 points and 547 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 585 points · 547 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 0 comments - 06240pts137comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 240 points and 137 comments. The source actually reported 712 points and 405 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 712 points · 405 comments → ·
- 07284pts257comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 284 points and 257 comments. The source actually reported 442 points and 401 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 442 points · 401 comments → ·
- 08589pts249comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 589 points and 249 comments. The source actually reported 589 points and 249 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 589 points · 249 comments → ·
- 09170pts90comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 170 points and 90 comments. The source actually reported 484 points and 257 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 484 points · 257 comments → ·
- 10187pts226comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 187 points and 226 comments. The source actually reported 304 points and 367 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 304 points · 367 comments → ·