Archived daily edition
Daily ranking · strictly above median
Welcome. On your next visit, NEW badges highlight picks added since you last read.
- 01446pts394comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 446 points and 394 comments. The source actually reported 840 points and 741 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 840 points · 741 comments → ·
- 02945pts956comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 945 points and 956 comments. The source actually reported 945 points and 956 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 945 points · 956 comments → ·
- 03306pts274comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 306 points and 274 comments. The source actually reported 1067 points and 955 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1067 points · 955 comments → ·
- 04884pts613comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 884 points and 613 comments. The source actually reported 884 points and 613 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 884 points · 613 comments → ·
- 05322pts307comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 322 points and 307 comments. The source actually reported 780 points and 744 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 780 points · 744 comments → ·
- 062017pts1125comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 2017 points and 1125 comments. The source actually reported 2017 points and 1125 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 2017 points · 1125 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 14 comments - 07220pts185comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 220 points and 185 comments. The source actually reported 770 points and 647 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 770 points · 647 comments → ·
- 08279pts160comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 279 points and 160 comments. The source actually reported 593 points and 340 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 593 points · 340 comments → ·
- 09202pts378comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 202 points and 378 comments. The source actually reported 472 points and 885 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 472 points · 885 comments → ·
- 10630pts277comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 630 points and 277 comments. The source actually reported 630 points and 277 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 630 points · 277 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 10 comments