Archived daily edition
Welcome. On your next visit, NEW badges highlight picks added since you last read.
- 011940pts476comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1940 points and 476 comments. The source actually reported 1940 points and 476 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1949 points · 478 comments → ·
- 02149pts52comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 149 points and 52 comments. The source actually reported 149 points and 52 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 149 points · 52 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 161 comments - 03372pts192comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 372 points and 192 comments. The source actually reported 911 points and 469 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 913 points · 474 comments → ·
- 04202pts363comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 202 points and 363 comments. The source actually reported 1488 points and 2675 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1590 points · 2901 comments → ·
- 05467pts191comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 467 points and 191 comments. The source actually reported 805 points and 329 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 809 points · 331 comments → ·
- 06509pts207comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 509 points and 207 comments. The source actually reported 686 points and 279 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 689 points · 279 comments → ·
- 07461pts612comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 461 points and 612 comments. The source actually reported 510 points and 678 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 519 points · 685 comments → ·
- 08356pts233comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 356 points and 233 comments. The source actually reported 647 points and 424 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 652 points · 427 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 49 comments - 09486pts192comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 486 points and 192 comments. The source actually reported 635 points and 250 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 640 points · 254 comments → ·
- 10362pts618comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 362 points and 618 comments. The source actually reported 390 points and 666 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 390 points · 669 comments → ·
Edition progress · 20/20 selections generated
Top 10: every 2 h 24 min. Top 20: every 1 h 12 min. UTC. Recovered gaps are marked estimated; gaps without eligible coverage remain missed.
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated