Archived daily edition
Daily ranking · strictly above median
Welcome. On your next visit, NEW badges highlight picks added since you last read.
- 11234pts81comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 234 points and 81 comments. The source actually reported 263 points and 91 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 263 points · 91 comments → ·
- 12117pts43comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 117 points and 43 comments. The source actually reported 296 points and 109 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 296 points · 109 comments → ·
- 13324pts116comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 324 points and 116 comments. The source actually reported 324 points and 116 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 324 points · 116 comments → ·
- 1499pts44comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 99 points and 44 comments. The source actually reported 278 points and 124 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 278 points · 124 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 5 comments - 15206pts626comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 206 points and 626 comments. The source actually reported 206 points and 626 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 206 points · 626 comments → ·
- 16182pts86comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 182 points and 86 comments. The source actually reported 212 points and 100 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 212 points · 100 comments → ·
- 1791pts57comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 91 points and 57 comments. The source actually reported 208 points and 131 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 208 points · 131 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 7 comments - 1870pts30comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 70 points and 30 comments. The source actually reported 320 points and 139 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 320 points · 139 comments → ·
- 1959pts19comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 59 points and 19 comments. The source actually reported 358 points and 118 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 358 points · 118 comments → ·
- 2096pts65comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 96 points and 65 comments. The source actually reported 169 points and 114 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 169 points · 114 comments → ·