Archived daily edition
Daily ranking · strictly above median
Welcome. On your next visit, NEW badges highlight picks added since you last read.
- 111137pts989comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1137 points and 989 comments. The source actually reported 1137 points and 989 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1137 points · 989 comments → ·
- 12571pts208comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 571 points and 208 comments. The source actually reported 571 points and 208 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 571 points · 208 comments → ·
- 13793pts309comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 793 points and 309 comments. The source actually reported 793 points and 309 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 793 points · 309 comments → ·
- 14303pts255comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 303 points and 255 comments. The source actually reported 349 points and 293 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 349 points · 293 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 0 comments - 15226pts105comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 226 points and 105 comments. The source actually reported 420 points and 195 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 420 points · 195 comments → ·
- 16408pts271comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 408 points and 271 comments. The source actually reported 408 points and 271 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 408 points · 271 comments → ·
- 17213pts134comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 213 points and 134 comments. The source actually reported 366 points and 230 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 366 points · 230 comments → ·
- 18129pts104comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 129 points and 104 comments. The source actually reported 445 points and 357 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 445 points · 357 comments → ·
- 19432pts301comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 432 points and 301 comments. The source actually reported 432 points and 301 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 432 points · 301 comments → ·
- 20191pts181comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 191 points and 181 comments. The source actually reported 282 points and 267 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 282 points · 267 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 48 comments