Archived daily edition
Daily ranking · strictly above median
Welcome. On your next visit, NEW badges highlight picks added since you last read.
- 01441pts554comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 441 points and 554 comments. The source actually reported 644 points and 809 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 644 points · 809 comments → ·
- 02370pts147comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 370 points and 147 comments. The source actually reported 656 points and 260 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 656 points · 260 comments → ·
- 03251pts246comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 251 points and 246 comments. The source actually reported 563 points and 550 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 563 points · 550 comments → ·
- 04267pts142comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 267 points and 142 comments. The source actually reported 479 points and 255 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 479 points · 255 comments → ·
- 05551pts196comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 551 points and 196 comments. The source actually reported 551 points and 196 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 551 points · 196 comments → ·
- 06239pts205comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 239 points and 205 comments. The source actually reported 415 points and 357 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 415 points · 357 comments → ·
- 07337pts136comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 337 points and 136 comments. The source actually reported 458 points and 184 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 458 points · 184 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 16 comments - 08172pts67comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 172 points and 67 comments. The source actually reported 697 points and 271 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 697 points · 271 comments → ·
- 09111pts163comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 111 points and 163 comments. The source actually reported 727 points and 1072 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 727 points · 1072 comments → ·
- 10479pts105comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 479 points and 105 comments. The source actually reported 479 points and 105 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 479 points · 105 comments → ·
- 11218pts105comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 218 points and 105 comments. The source actually reported 429 points and 206 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 429 points · 206 comments → ·
- 12153pts81comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 153 points and 81 comments. The source actually reported 615 points and 327 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 615 points · 327 comments → ·
- 13226pts78comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 226 points and 78 comments. The source actually reported 419 points and 144 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 419 points · 144 comments → ·
- 14178pts73comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 178 points and 73 comments. The source actually reported 449 points and 185 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 449 points · 185 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 7 comments - 15163pts87comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 163 points and 87 comments. The source actually reported 410 points and 220 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 410 points · 220 comments → ·
- 16526pts296comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 526 points and 296 comments. The source actually reported 526 points and 296 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 526 points · 296 comments → ·
- 1795pts48comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 95 points and 48 comments. The source actually reported 1142 points and 576 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1142 points · 576 comments → ·
- 181389pts726comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1389 points and 726 comments. The source actually reported 1389 points and 726 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1389 points · 726 comments → ·
- 19408pts310comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 408 points and 310 comments. The source actually reported 408 points and 310 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 408 points · 310 comments → ·
- 20278pts126comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 278 points and 126 comments. The source actually reported 287 points and 130 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 287 points · 130 comments → ·
- 211446pts287comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1446 points and 287 comments. The source actually reported 1446 points and 287 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1446 points · 287 comments → ·
- 22275pts189comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 275 points and 189 comments. The source actually reported 275 points and 189 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 275 points · 189 comments → ·
- 23807pts339comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 807 points and 339 comments. The source actually reported 807 points and 339 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 807 points · 339 comments → ·
- 24124pts90comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 124 points and 90 comments. The source actually reported 253 points and 183 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 253 points · 183 comments → ·
- 25278pts706comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 278 points and 706 comments. The source actually reported 278 points and 706 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 278 points · 706 comments → ·
- 26199pts140comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 199 points and 140 comments. The source actually reported 218 points and 153 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 218 points · 153 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 4 comments - 27110pts63comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 110 points and 63 comments. The source actually reported 220 points and 127 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 220 points · 127 comments → ·
- 28413pts228comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 413 points and 228 comments. The source actually reported 413 points and 228 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 413 points · 228 comments → ·
- 29279pts107comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 279 points and 107 comments. The source actually reported 279 points and 107 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 279 points · 107 comments → ·
- 30107pts82comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 107 points and 82 comments. The source actually reported 194 points and 149 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 194 points · 149 comments → ·
- 31708pts363comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 708 points and 363 comments. The source actually reported 708 points and 363 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 708 points · 363 comments → ·
- 32143pts134comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 143 points and 134 comments. The source actually reported 161 points and 151 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 161 points · 151 comments → ·
- 33614pts99comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 614 points and 99 comments. The source actually reported 614 points and 99 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 614 points · 99 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 12 comments - 34472pts329comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 472 points and 329 comments. The source actually reported 472 points and 329 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 472 points · 329 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 0 comments - 3545pts23comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 45 points and 23 comments. The source actually reported 751 points and 376 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 751 points · 376 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 23 comments - 3690pts50comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 90 points and 50 comments. The source actually reported 181 points and 100 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 181 points · 100 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 10 comments - 3768pts12comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 68 points and 12 comments. The source actually reported 380 points and 65 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 380 points · 65 comments → ·
- 38299pts247comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 299 points and 247 comments. The source actually reported 299 points and 247 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 299 points · 247 comments → ·
- 39329pts155comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 329 points and 155 comments. The source actually reported 329 points and 155 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 329 points · 155 comments → ·
- 40140pts101comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 140 points and 101 comments. The source actually reported 152 points and 110 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 152 points · 110 comments → ·
- 4153pts55comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 53 points and 55 comments. The source actually reported 160 points and 167 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 160 points · 167 comments → ·
- 4281pts10comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 81 points and 10 comments. The source actually reported 269 points and 32 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 269 points · 32 comments → ·
- 4356pts12comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 56 points and 12 comments. The source actually reported 317 points and 70 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 317 points · 70 comments → ·
- 441052pts288comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1052 points and 288 comments. The source actually reported 1052 points and 288 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1052 points · 288 comments → ·
- 4534pts23comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 34 points and 23 comments. The source actually reported 287 points and 193 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 287 points · 193 comments → ·
- 46221pts71comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 221 points and 71 comments. The source actually reported 221 points and 71 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 221 points · 71 comments → ·
- 47265pts55comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 265 points and 55 comments. The source actually reported 265 points and 55 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 265 points · 55 comments → ·
- 48179pts116comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 179 points and 116 comments. The source actually reported 179 points and 116 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 179 points · 116 comments → ·
- 49130pts38comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 130 points and 38 comments. The source actually reported 151 points and 44 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 151 points · 44 comments → ·
- 50225pts88comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 225 points and 88 comments. The source actually reported 225 points and 88 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 225 points · 88 comments → ·
- 51217pts109comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 217 points and 109 comments. The source actually reported 217 points and 109 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 217 points · 109 comments → ·
- 5227pts11comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 27 points and 11 comments. The source actually reported 453 points and 178 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 453 points · 178 comments → ·
- 53702pts339comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 702 points and 339 comments. The source actually reported 702 points and 339 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 702 points · 339 comments → ·
- 5448pts56comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 48 points and 56 comments. The source actually reported 96 points and 113 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 96 points · 113 comments → ·
- 55199pts105comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 199 points and 105 comments. The source actually reported 199 points and 105 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 199 points · 105 comments → ·
- 5674pts20comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 74 points and 20 comments. The source actually reported 192 points and 51 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 192 points · 51 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 38 comments Programming.dev · 16 comments - 5748pts15comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 48 points and 15 comments. The source actually reported 133 points and 43 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 133 points · 43 comments → ·
- 58522pts528comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 522 points and 528 comments. The source actually reported 522 points and 528 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 522 points · 528 comments → ·
- 5935pts11comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 35 points and 11 comments. The source actually reported 152 points and 47 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 152 points · 47 comments → ·
- 6038pts63comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 38 points and 63 comments. The source actually reported 74 points and 122 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 74 points · 122 comments → ·
- 61296pts321comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 296 points and 321 comments. The source actually reported 296 points and 321 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 296 points · 321 comments → ·
- 6234pts39comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 34 points and 39 comments. The source actually reported 78 points and 89 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 78 points · 89 comments → ·
- 6353pts39comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 53 points and 39 comments. The source actually reported 87 points and 64 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 87 points · 64 comments → ·
- 6457pts44comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 57 points and 44 comments. The source actually reported 85 points and 65 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 85 points · 65 comments → ·
- 65445pts357comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 445 points and 357 comments. The source actually reported 445 points and 357 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 445 points · 357 comments → ·
- 6624pts30comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 24 points and 30 comments. The source actually reported 74 points and 91 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 74 points · 91 comments → ·
- 6754pts19comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 54 points and 19 comments. The source actually reported 101 points and 36 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 101 points · 36 comments → ·
- 6869pts146comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 69 points and 146 comments. The source actually reported 69 points and 147 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 69 points · 147 comments → ·
- 6978pts48comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 78 points and 48 comments. The source actually reported 90 points and 55 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 90 points · 55 comments → ·
- 70131pts14comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 131 points and 14 comments. The source actually reported 135 points and 14 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 135 points · 14 comments → ·
- 7111pts19comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 11 points and 19 comments. The source actually reported 64 points and 110 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 64 points · 110 comments → ·
- 7258pts11comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 58 points and 11 comments. The source actually reported 101 points and 19 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 101 points · 19 comments → ·
- 7356pts151comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 56 points and 151 comments. The source actually reported 57 points and 153 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 57 points · 153 comments → ·
- 7426pts9comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 26 points and 9 comments. The source actually reported 89 points and 32 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 89 points · 32 comments → ·
- 75212pts189comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 212 points and 189 comments. The source actually reported 212 points and 189 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 212 points · 189 comments → ·
- 7621pts9comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 21 points and 9 comments. The source actually reported 86 points and 38 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 86 points · 38 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 7 comments - 7730pts35comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 30 points and 35 comments. The source actually reported 58 points and 69 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 58 points · 69 comments → ·
- 789pts6comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 6 comments. The source actually reported 138 points and 82 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 138 points · 82 comments → ·
- 7932pts40comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 32 points and 40 comments. The source actually reported 57 points and 71 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 57 points · 71 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 15 comments - 8022pts8comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 22 points and 8 comments. The source actually reported 84 points and 31 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 84 points · 31 comments → ·
- 8117pts36comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 17 points and 36 comments. The source actually reported 42 points and 90 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 42 points · 90 comments → ·
- 8211pts7comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 11 points and 7 comments. The source actually reported 82 points and 52 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 82 points · 52 comments → ·
- 8324pts7comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 24 points and 7 comments. The source actually reported 76 points and 21 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 76 points · 21 comments → ·
- 84105pts80comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 105 points and 80 comments. The source actually reported 105 points and 80 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 105 points · 80 comments → ·
- 8518pts7comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 18 points and 7 comments. The source actually reported 73 points and 26 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 73 points · 26 comments → ·
- 865pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 100 points and 81 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 100 points · 81 comments → ·
- 8715pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 15 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 85 points and 18 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 85 points · 18 comments → ·
- 88331pts210comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 331 points and 210 comments. The source actually reported 331 points and 210 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 331 points · 210 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 15 comments - 8924pts20comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 24 points and 20 comments. The source actually reported 52 points and 44 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 52 points · 44 comments → ·
- 90115pts40comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 115 points and 40 comments. The source actually reported 115 points and 40 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 115 points · 40 comments → ·
- 9187pts194comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 87 points and 194 comments. The source actually reported 87 points and 194 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 87 points · 194 comments → ·
- 92192pts167comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 192 points and 167 comments. The source actually reported 192 points and 167 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 192 points · 167 comments → ·
- 93136pts53comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 136 points and 53 comments. The source actually reported 136 points and 53 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 136 points · 53 comments → ·
- 9413pts10comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 13 points and 10 comments. The source actually reported 44 points and 34 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 44 points · 34 comments → ·
- 958pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 57 points and 20 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 57 points · 20 comments → ·
- 9654pts51comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 54 points and 51 comments. The source actually reported 57 points and 54 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 57 points · 54 comments → ·
- 97143pts32comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 143 points and 32 comments. The source actually reported 143 points and 32 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 143 points · 32 comments → ·
- 9836pts68comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 36 points and 68 comments. The source actually reported 42 points and 80 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 42 points · 80 comments → ·
- 998pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 64 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 64 points · 3 comments → ·
- 100493pts254comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 493 points and 254 comments. The source actually reported 493 points and 254 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 493 points · 254 comments → ·
- 10111pts28comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 11 points and 28 comments. The source actually reported 26 points and 63 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 26 points · 63 comments → ·
- 10211pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 11 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 56 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 56 points · 5 comments → ·
- 1036pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 34 points and 18 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 34 points · 18 comments → ·
- 10441pts43comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 41 points and 43 comments. The source actually reported 48 points and 51 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 48 points · 51 comments → ·
- 1056pts7comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 7 comments. The source actually reported 27 points and 31 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 27 points · 31 comments → ·
- 106432pts55comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 432 points and 55 comments. The source actually reported 432 points and 55 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 432 points · 55 comments → ·
- 10711pts7comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 11 points and 7 comments. The source actually reported 34 points and 20 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 34 points · 20 comments → ·
- 10880pts113comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 80 points and 113 comments. The source actually reported 80 points and 113 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 80 points · 113 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 34 comments - 1095pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 19 points and 8 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 19 points · 8 comments → ·
- 11074pts99comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 74 points and 99 comments. The source actually reported 74 points and 99 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 74 points · 99 comments → ·
- 11146pts26comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 46 points and 26 comments. The source actually reported 50 points and 28 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 50 points · 28 comments → ·
- 112420pts195comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 420 points and 195 comments. The source actually reported 420 points and 195 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 420 points · 195 comments → ·
- 113189pts68comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 189 points and 68 comments. The source actually reported 189 points and 68 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 189 points · 68 comments → ·
- 11437pts55comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 37 points and 55 comments. The source actually reported 38 points and 57 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 38 points · 57 comments → ·
- 1155pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 19 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 19 points · 0 comments → ·
- 11610pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 33 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 33 points · 1 comments → ·
- 11757pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 57 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 67 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 67 points · 5 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 0 comments - 11813pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 13 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 29 points and 12 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 29 points · 12 comments → ·
- 119214pts157comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 214 points and 157 comments. The source actually reported 214 points and 157 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 214 points · 157 comments → ·
- 1205pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 16 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 16 points · 4 comments → ·
- 12135pts31comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 35 points and 31 comments. The source actually reported 59 points and 52 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 59 points · 52 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 5 comments - 1229pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 23 points and 7 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 23 points · 7 comments → ·
- 12310pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 27 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 27 points · 2 comments → ·
- 12432pts66comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 32 points and 66 comments. The source actually reported 32 points and 66 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 32 points · 66 comments → ·
- 125366pts230comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 366 points and 230 comments. The source actually reported 366 points and 230 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 366 points · 230 comments → ·
- 126250pts349comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 250 points and 349 comments. The source actually reported 250 points and 349 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 250 points · 349 comments → ·
- 12725pts9comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 25 points and 9 comments. The source actually reported 34 points and 12 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 34 points · 12 comments → ·
- 12816pts9comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 16 points and 9 comments. The source actually reported 26 points and 15 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 26 points · 15 comments → ·
- 12949pts12comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 49 points and 12 comments. The source actually reported 50 points and 12 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 50 points · 12 comments → ·
- 13018pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 18 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 124 points and 29 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 124 points · 29 comments → ·
- 131317pts112comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 317 points and 112 comments. The source actually reported 317 points and 112 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 317 points · 112 comments → ·
Also discussed: Programming.dev · 3 comments Lobsters · 5 comments - 1326pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 13 points and 6 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 13 points · 6 comments → ·
- 13363pts70comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 63 points and 70 comments. The source actually reported 63 points and 70 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 63 points · 70 comments → ·
- 13426pts22comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 26 points and 22 comments. The source actually reported 29 points and 25 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 29 points · 25 comments → ·
- 13548pts27comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 48 points and 27 comments. The source actually reported 48 points and 27 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 48 points · 27 comments → ·
- 136193pts225comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 193 points and 225 comments. The source actually reported 193 points and 225 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 193 points · 225 comments → ·
- 13775pts14comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 75 points and 14 comments. The source actually reported 75 points and 14 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 75 points · 14 comments → ·
- 13827pts42comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 27 points and 42 comments. The source actually reported 27 points and 42 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 27 points · 42 comments → ·
- 1397pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 14 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 14 points · 2 comments → ·
- 14048pts56comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 48 points and 56 comments. The source actually reported 48 points and 56 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 48 points · 56 comments → ·
- 141177pts50comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 177 points and 50 comments. The source actually reported 177 points and 50 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 177 points · 50 comments → ·
- 14215pts14comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 15 points and 14 comments. The source actually reported 18 points and 17 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 18 points · 17 comments → ·
- 1439pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 14 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 14 points · 5 comments → ·
- 14443pts25comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 43 points and 25 comments. The source actually reported 43 points and 25 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 43 points · 25 comments → ·
- 14541pts35comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 41 points and 35 comments. The source actually reported 41 points and 35 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 41 points · 35 comments → ·
- 146155pts371comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 155 points and 371 comments. The source actually reported 155 points and 371 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 155 points · 371 comments → ·
- 147282pts267comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 282 points and 267 comments. The source actually reported 282 points and 267 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 282 points · 267 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 48 comments - 148218pts119comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 218 points and 119 comments. The source actually reported 218 points and 119 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 218 points · 119 comments → ·
- 149306pts48comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 306 points and 48 comments. The source actually reported 306 points and 48 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 306 points · 48 comments → ·
- 1509pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 13 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 13 points · 1 comments → ·
- 151181pts237comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 181 points and 237 comments. The source actually reported 181 points and 237 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 181 points · 237 comments → ·
- 152349pts293comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 349 points and 293 comments. The source actually reported 349 points and 293 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 349 points · 293 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 0 comments - 153200pts66comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 200 points and 66 comments. The source actually reported 200 points and 66 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 200 points · 66 comments → ·
- 154214pts118comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 214 points and 118 comments. The source actually reported 214 points and 118 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 214 points · 118 comments → ·
- 15541pts99comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 41 points and 99 comments. The source actually reported 41 points and 99 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 41 points · 99 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 17 comments - 1566pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 9 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 9 points · 1 comments → ·
- 15752pts42comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 52 points and 42 comments. The source actually reported 52 points and 42 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 52 points · 42 comments → ·
- 158208pts58comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 208 points and 58 comments. The source actually reported 208 points and 58 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 208 points · 58 comments → ·
- 1599pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 13 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 13 points · 2 comments → ·
- 16051pts25comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 51 points and 25 comments. The source actually reported 51 points and 25 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 51 points · 25 comments → ·
- 16132pts8comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 32 points and 8 comments. The source actually reported 32 points and 8 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 32 points · 8 comments → ·
- 16221pts28comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 21 points and 28 comments. The source actually reported 21 points and 28 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 21 points · 28 comments → ·
- 163190pts67comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 190 points and 67 comments. The source actually reported 190 points and 67 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 190 points · 67 comments → ·
- 16469pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 69 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 69 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 69 points · 4 comments → ·
- 16515pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 15 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 17 points and 6 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 17 points · 6 comments → ·
- 1669pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 12 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 12 points · 1 comments → ·
- 16710pts25comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 25 comments. The source actually reported 10 points and 25 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 10 points · 25 comments → ·
- 16833pts11comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 33 points and 11 comments. The source actually reported 33 points and 11 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 33 points · 11 comments → ·
- 169142pts39comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 142 points and 39 comments. The source actually reported 142 points and 39 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 142 points · 39 comments → ·
- 170195pts173comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 195 points and 173 comments. The source actually reported 195 points and 173 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 195 points · 173 comments → ·
- 17129pts40comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 29 points and 40 comments. The source actually reported 29 points and 40 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 29 points · 40 comments → ·
- 1725pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 3 comments → ·
- 173148pts172comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 148 points and 172 comments. The source actually reported 148 points and 172 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 148 points · 172 comments → ·
- 1745pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 1 comments → ·
- 1758pts7comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 7 comments. The source actually reported 9 points and 8 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 9 points · 8 comments → ·
- 1766pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 3 comments → ·
- 1775pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 1 comments → ·
- 17829pts12comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 29 points and 12 comments. The source actually reported 29 points and 12 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 29 points · 12 comments → ·
- 1796pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 3 comments → ·
- 18036pts10comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 36 points and 10 comments. The source actually reported 36 points and 10 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 36 points · 10 comments → ·
- 1816pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 5 comments → ·
- 18213pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 13 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 14 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 14 points · 0 comments → ·
- 18316pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 16 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 16 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 16 points · 1 comments → ·
- 18414pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 14 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 15 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 15 points · 0 comments → ·
- 185186pts57comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 186 points and 57 comments. The source actually reported 186 points and 57 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 186 points · 57 comments → ·
- 186138pts73comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 138 points and 73 comments. The source actually reported 138 points and 73 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 138 points · 73 comments → ·
- 187163pts39comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 163 points and 39 comments. The source actually reported 163 points and 39 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 163 points · 39 comments → ·
- 1886pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 1 comments → ·
- 18993pts97comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 93 points and 97 comments. The source actually reported 93 points and 97 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 93 points · 97 comments → ·
- 1905pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 0 comments → ·
- 19120pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 20 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 33 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 33 points · 3 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 35 comments - 1928pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 5 comments → ·
- 1937pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 3 comments → ·
- 194241pts181comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 241 points and 181 comments. The source actually reported 241 points and 181 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 241 points · 181 comments → ·
- 19512pts7comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 12 points and 7 comments. The source actually reported 12 points and 7 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 12 points · 7 comments → ·
- 19620pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 20 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 20 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 20 points · 4 comments → ·
- 1975pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 0 comments → ·
- 198187pts92comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 187 points and 92 comments. The source actually reported 187 points and 92 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 187 points · 92 comments → ·
- 19910pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 10 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 10 points · 0 comments → ·
- 20016pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 16 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 16 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 16 points · 2 comments → ·
- 2016pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 5 comments → ·
- 20291pts42comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 91 points and 42 comments. The source actually reported 91 points and 42 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 91 points · 42 comments → ·
- 2038pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 1 comments → ·
- 20410pts15comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 15 comments. The source actually reported 10 points and 15 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 10 points · 15 comments → ·
- 20558pts13comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 58 points and 13 comments. The source actually reported 58 points and 13 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 58 points · 13 comments → ·
- 2065pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 1 comments → ·
- 2075pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 0 comments → ·
- 20811pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 11 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 11 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 11 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2096pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2106pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 2 comments → ·
- 2117pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2127pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 0 comments → ·
- 213241pts76comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 241 points and 76 comments. The source actually reported 241 points and 76 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 241 points · 76 comments → ·
- 21411pts22comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 11 points and 22 comments. The source actually reported 11 points and 22 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 11 points · 22 comments → ·
- 2155pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2168pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 0 comments → ·
- 21710pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 10 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 10 points · 3 comments → ·
- 21889pts40comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 89 points and 40 comments. The source actually reported 89 points and 40 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 89 points · 40 comments → ·
- 2199pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 9 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 9 points · 1 comments → ·
- 2208pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2215pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 2 comments → ·
- 2229pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 9 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 9 points · 4 comments → ·
- 2235pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 1 comments → ·
- 2248pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2256pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 0 comments → ·
- 22635pts107comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 35 points and 107 comments. The source actually reported 35 points and 107 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 35 points · 107 comments → ·
- 22710pts12comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 12 comments. The source actually reported 10 points and 12 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 10 points · 12 comments → ·
- 2285pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2296pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2305pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2316pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2325pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 0 comments → ·
- 233228pts69comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 228 points and 69 comments. The source actually reported 228 points and 69 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 228 points · 69 comments → ·
- 2346pts12comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 12 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 12 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 12 comments → ·
- 23570pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 70 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 70 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 70 points · 4 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 1 comments - 2369pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 9 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 9 points · 4 comments → ·
- 23730pts6comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 30 points and 6 comments. The source actually reported 30 points and 6 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 30 points · 6 comments → ·
- 2386pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 2 comments → ·
- 23917pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 17 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 23 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 23 points · 3 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 23 comments - 24079pts46comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 79 points and 46 comments. The source actually reported 79 points and 46 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 79 points · 46 comments → ·
- 2418pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 2 comments → ·
- 2429pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 9 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 9 points · 2 comments → ·
- 243105pts102comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 105 points and 102 comments. The source actually reported 105 points and 102 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 105 points · 102 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 22 comments - 2445pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 1 comments → ·
- 245196pts85comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 196 points and 85 comments. The source actually reported 196 points and 85 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 196 points · 85 comments → ·
- 24662pts79comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 62 points and 79 comments. The source actually reported 62 points and 79 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 62 points · 79 comments → ·
- 2475pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 0 comments → ·
- 24855pts16comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 55 points and 16 comments. The source actually reported 55 points and 16 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 55 points · 16 comments → ·
- 249103pts38comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 103 points and 38 comments. The source actually reported 103 points and 38 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 103 points · 38 comments → ·
- 25010pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 10 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 10 points · 1 comments → ·
- 25195pts86comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 95 points and 86 comments. The source actually reported 95 points and 86 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 95 points · 86 comments → ·
- 25211pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 11 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 11 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 11 points · 1 comments → ·
- 2535pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2546pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 1 comments → ·
- 2556pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 4 comments → ·
- 2565pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 1 comments → ·
- 257106pts104comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 106 points and 104 comments. The source actually reported 106 points and 104 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 106 points · 104 comments → ·
- 2585pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 1 comments → ·
- 25969pts28comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 69 points and 28 comments. The source actually reported 69 points and 28 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 69 points · 28 comments → ·
- 26052pts71comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 52 points and 71 comments. The source actually reported 52 points and 71 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 52 points · 71 comments → ·
- 261161pts252comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 161 points and 252 comments. The source actually reported 161 points and 252 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 161 points · 252 comments → ·
- 2625pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 0 comments → ·
- 26324pts50comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 24 points and 50 comments. The source actually reported 24 points and 50 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 24 points · 50 comments → ·
- 26464pts40comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 64 points and 40 comments. The source actually reported 64 points and 40 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 64 points · 40 comments → ·
- 2656pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2665pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 2 comments → ·
- 2677pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2686pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 1 comments → ·
- 2695pts6comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 6 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 6 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 6 comments → ·
- 27012pts20comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 12 points and 20 comments. The source actually reported 12 points and 20 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 12 points · 20 comments → ·
- 2715pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2727pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 1 comments → ·
- 2735pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2745pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 1 comments → ·
- 27528pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 28 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 28 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 28 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2765pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 1 comments → ·
- 27780pts39comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 80 points and 39 comments. The source actually reported 80 points and 39 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 80 points · 39 comments → ·
- 27822pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 22 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 22 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 22 points · 1 comments → ·
- 27910pts6comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 6 comments. The source actually reported 10 points and 6 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 10 points · 6 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 0 comments - 28025pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 25 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 25 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 25 points · 3 comments → ·
- 28119pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 19 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 19 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 19 points · 1 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 119 comments - 28234pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 34 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 34 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 34 points · 2 comments → ·
- 28322pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 22 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 22 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 22 points · 2 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 0 comments - 28462pts12comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 62 points and 12 comments. The source actually reported 62 points and 12 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 62 points · 12 comments → ·
- 28515pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 15 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 15 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 15 points · 2 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 5 comments - 2868pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 0 comments → ·
- 28710pts7comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 7 comments. The source actually reported 10 points and 7 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 10 points · 7 comments → ·
- 28867pts8comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 67 points and 8 comments. The source actually reported 67 points and 8 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 67 points · 8 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 0 comments Hacker News · 0 comments - 28957pts20comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 57 points and 20 comments. The source actually reported 57 points and 20 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 57 points · 20 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 0 comments Hacker News · 0 comments - 290102pts19comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 102 points and 19 comments. The source actually reported 102 points and 19 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 102 points · 19 comments → ·
- 29139pts16comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 39 points and 16 comments. The source actually reported 39 points and 16 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 39 points · 16 comments → ·
- 292132pts3commentsMargaret Hamilton, computing pioneer who led software development for the Apollo program, dies at 90
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 132 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 132 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 132 points · 3 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 259 comments Lobsters · 6 comments - 29321pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 21 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 21 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 21 points · 5 comments → ·