Archived daily edition
Welcome. On your next visit, NEW badges highlight picks added since you last read.
- 01229pts91comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 229 points and 91 comments. The source actually reported 611 points and 243 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 611 points · 243 comments → ·
- 02198pts91comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 198 points and 91 comments. The source actually reported 402 points and 185 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 402 points · 185 comments → ·
- 0317pts17comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 17 points and 17 comments. The source actually reported 61 points and 59 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 61 points · 59 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 47 comments - 04201pts58comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 201 points and 58 comments. The source actually reported 415 points and 119 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 415 points · 119 comments → ·
- 05105pts320comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 105 points and 320 comments. The source actually reported 206 points and 626 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 206 points · 626 comments → ·
- 06136pts273comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 136 points and 273 comments. The source actually reported 207 points and 415 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 207 points · 415 comments → ·
- 0723pts15comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 23 points and 15 comments. The source actually reported 66 points and 43 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 66 points · 43 comments → ·
- 0886pts85comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 86 points and 85 comments. The source actually reported 632 points and 625 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 632 points · 625 comments → ·
- 0919pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 19 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 102 points and 14 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 102 points · 14 comments → ·
- 1064pts41comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 64 points and 41 comments. The source actually reported 472 points and 303 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 472 points · 303 comments → ·
- 11254pts91comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 254 points and 91 comments. The source actually reported 324 points and 116 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 324 points · 116 comments → ·
- 12128pts44comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 128 points and 44 comments. The source actually reported 263 points and 91 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 263 points · 91 comments → ·
- 1329pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 29 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 58 points and 10 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 58 points · 10 comments → ·
- 1417pts7comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 17 points and 7 comments. The source actually reported 194 points and 80 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 194 points · 80 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 346 comments - 1553pts34comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 53 points and 34 comments. The source actually reported 386 points and 244 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 386 points · 244 comments → ·
- 16140pts66comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 140 points and 66 comments. The source actually reported 212 points and 100 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 212 points · 100 comments → ·
- 1770pts30comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 70 points and 30 comments. The source actually reported 589 points and 249 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 589 points · 249 comments → ·
- 18116pts65comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 116 points and 65 comments. The source actually reported 2017 points and 1125 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 2017 points · 1125 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 14 comments - 19107pts73comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 107 points and 73 comments. The source actually reported 396 points and 269 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 396 points · 269 comments → ·
- 2097pts53comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 97 points and 53 comments. The source actually reported 327 points and 178 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 327 points · 178 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 25 comments
Edition progress · 20/20 selections generated
Top 10: every 2 h 24 min. Top 20: every 1 h 12 min. UTC. Recovered gaps are marked estimated; gaps without eligible coverage remain missed.
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated