Archived daily edition
Welcome. On your next visit, NEW badges highlight picks added since you last read.
- 01364pts256comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 364 points and 256 comments. The source actually reported 1705 points and 1199 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1705 points · 1199 comments → ·
- 021067pts955comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1067 points and 955 comments. The source actually reported 1067 points and 955 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1067 points · 955 comments → ·
- 03926pts394comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 926 points and 394 comments. The source actually reported 926 points and 394 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 926 points · 394 comments → ·
- 04540pts286comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 540 points and 286 comments. The source actually reported 687 points and 363 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 687 points · 363 comments → ·
- 05499pts371comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 499 points and 371 comments. The source actually reported 525 points and 391 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 525 points · 391 comments → ·
- 0655pts23comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 55 points and 23 comments. The source actually reported 59 points and 25 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 59 points · 25 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 1 comments - 07448pts477comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 448 points and 477 comments. The source actually reported 468 points and 499 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 468 points · 499 comments → ·
- 08360pts338comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 360 points and 338 comments. The source actually reported 483 points and 454 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 483 points · 454 comments → ·
- 09326pts367comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 326 points and 367 comments. The source actually reported 413 points and 465 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 413 points · 465 comments → ·
- 10324pts613comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 324 points and 613 comments. The source actually reported 340 points and 643 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 340 points · 643 comments → ·
- 11374pts161comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 374 points and 161 comments. The source actually reported 397 points and 171 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 397 points · 171 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 0 comments - 12182pts168comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 182 points and 168 comments. The source actually reported 414 points and 382 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 414 points · 382 comments → ·
- 13224pts119comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 224 points and 119 comments. The source actually reported 307 points and 163 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 307 points · 163 comments → ·
- 14153pts43comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 153 points and 43 comments. The source actually reported 634 points and 178 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 634 points · 178 comments → ·
- 1555pts22comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 55 points and 22 comments. The source actually reported 144 points and 58 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 144 points · 58 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 31 comments - 16138pts126comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 138 points and 126 comments. The source actually reported 417 points and 380 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 417 points · 380 comments → ·
- 17126pts141comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 126 points and 141 comments. The source actually reported 400 points and 446 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 400 points · 446 comments → ·
- 18144pts52comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 144 points and 52 comments. The source actually reported 1689 points and 609 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1689 points · 610 comments → ·
- 19142pts131comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 142 points and 131 comments. The source actually reported 583 points and 536 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 583 points · 536 comments → ·
Also discussed: Programming.dev · 25 comments Lobsters · 73 comments - 20206pts70comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 206 points and 70 comments. The source actually reported 642 points and 218 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 642 points · 218 comments → ·
Edition progress · 20/20 selections generated
Top 10: every 2 h 24 min. Top 20: every 1 h 12 min. UTC. Recovered gaps are marked estimated; gaps without eligible coverage remain missed.
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated