Archived daily edition
Welcome. On your next visit, NEW badges highlight picks added since you last read.
- 011689pts609comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1689 points and 609 comments. The source actually reported 1689 points and 609 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1689 points · 610 comments → ·
- 02814pts418comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 814 points and 418 comments. The source actually reported 814 points and 418 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 814 points · 418 comments → ·
- 03583pts411comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 583 points and 411 comments. The source actually reported 583 points and 411 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 583 points · 411 comments → ·
- 04232pts137comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 232 points and 137 comments. The source actually reported 574 points and 340 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 574 points · 340 comments → ·
- 051705pts1199comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1705 points and 1199 comments. The source actually reported 1705 points and 1199 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1705 points · 1199 comments → ·
- 06417pts228comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 417 points and 228 comments. The source actually reported 417 points and 228 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 417 points · 228 comments → ·
- 0759pts17comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 59 points and 17 comments. The source actually reported 141 points and 40 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 141 points · 40 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 1 comments - 08385pts79comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 385 points and 79 comments. The source actually reported 411 points and 84 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 411 points · 84 comments → ·
- 09193pts58comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 193 points and 58 comments. The source actually reported 468 points and 140 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 468 points · 140 comments → ·
- 10190pts46comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 190 points and 46 comments. The source actually reported 524 points and 128 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 524 points · 128 comments → ·
- 1189pts12comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 89 points and 12 comments. The source actually reported 133 points and 18 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 133 points · 18 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 208 comments - 12100pts12comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 100 points and 12 comments. The source actually reported 100 points and 12 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 100 points · 12 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 21 comments - 13178pts84comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 178 points and 84 comments. The source actually reported 713 points and 336 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 713 points · 336 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 5 comments - 1473pts28comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 73 points and 28 comments. The source actually reported 73 points and 28 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 73 points · 28 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 89 comments - 15298pts206comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 298 points and 206 comments. The source actually reported 319 points and 221 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 319 points · 221 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 40 comments - 16112pts185comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 112 points and 185 comments. The source actually reported 497 points and 818 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 497 points · 818 comments → ·
- 17368pts107comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 368 points and 107 comments. The source actually reported 368 points and 107 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 368 points · 107 comments → ·
- 1868pts137comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 68 points and 137 comments. The source actually reported 423 points and 850 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 423 points · 850 comments → ·
- 1994pts75comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 94 points and 75 comments. The source actually reported 392 points and 312 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 392 points · 312 comments → ·
- 20144pts38comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 144 points and 38 comments. The source actually reported 326 points and 86 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 326 points · 86 comments → ·
Edition progress · 20/20 selections generated
Top 10: every 2 h 24 min. Top 20: every 1 h 12 min. UTC. Recovered gaps are marked estimated; gaps without eligible coverage remain missed.
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated