Archived daily edition
Welcome. On your next visit, NEW badges highlight picks added since you last read.
- 01463pts218comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 463 points and 218 comments. The source actually reported 713 points and 336 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 713 points · 336 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 5 comments - 02261pts430comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 261 points and 430 comments. The source actually reported 497 points and 818 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 497 points · 818 comments → ·
- 03174pts349comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 174 points and 349 comments. The source actually reported 423 points and 850 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 423 points · 850 comments → ·
- 04524pts128comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 524 points and 128 comments. The source actually reported 524 points and 128 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 524 points · 128 comments → ·
- 05203pts48comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 203 points and 48 comments. The source actually reported 947 points and 222 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 947 points · 222 comments → ·
- 06186pts89comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 186 points and 89 comments. The source actually reported 652 points and 313 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 652 points · 313 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 18 comments - 07215pts117comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 215 points and 117 comments. The source actually reported 503 points and 274 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 503 points · 274 comments → ·
- 08270pts215comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 270 points and 215 comments. The source actually reported 392 points and 312 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 392 points · 312 comments → ·
- 09325pts70comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 325 points and 70 comments. The source actually reported 501 points and 108 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 501 points · 108 comments → ·
- 10252pts160comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 252 points and 160 comments. The source actually reported 336 points and 213 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 336 points · 213 comments → ·
- 11297pts76comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 297 points and 76 comments. The source actually reported 373 points and 96 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 373 points · 96 comments → ·
- 12141pts158comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 141 points and 158 comments. The source actually reported 330 points and 370 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 330 points · 370 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 35 comments - 13107pts48comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 107 points and 48 comments. The source actually reported 939 points and 420 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 939 points · 420 comments → ·
- 14224pts257comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 224 points and 257 comments. The source actually reported 237 points and 272 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 237 points · 272 comments → ·
- 15279pts45comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 279 points and 45 comments. The source actually reported 339 points and 55 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 339 points · 55 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 0 comments - 16230pts206comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 230 points and 206 comments. The source actually reported 233 points and 209 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 233 points · 209 comments → ·
- 17126pts331comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 126 points and 331 comments. The source actually reported 169 points and 446 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 169 points · 446 comments → ·
- 18174pts92comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 174 points and 92 comments. The source actually reported 245 points and 129 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 245 points · 129 comments → ·
- 19100pts72comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 100 points and 72 comments. The source actually reported 775 points and 559 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 775 points · 559 comments → ·
- 2097pts131comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 97 points and 131 comments. The source actually reported 529 points and 716 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 529 points · 716 comments → ·
Edition progress · 20/20 selections generated
Top 10: every 2 h 24 min. Top 20: every 1 h 12 min. UTC. Recovered gaps are marked estimated; gaps without eligible coverage remain missed.
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated