Archived daily edition
Welcome. On your next visit, NEW badges highlight picks added since you last read.
- 011467pts2636comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1467 points and 2636 comments. The source actually reported 1488 points and 2675 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1590 points · 2893 comments → ·
- 02374pts138comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 374 points and 138 comments. The source actually reported 918 points and 339 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1001 points · 371 comments → ·
- 03911pts469comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 911 points and 469 comments. The source actually reported 911 points and 469 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 913 points · 474 comments → ·
- 04312pts265comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 312 points and 265 comments. The source actually reported 538 points and 458 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 581 points · 525 comments → ·
- 05233pts217comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 233 points and 217 comments. The source actually reported 388 points and 362 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 446 points · 438 comments → ·
- 06647pts424comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 647 points and 424 comments. The source actually reported 647 points and 424 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 651 points · 425 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 49 comments - 07248pts326comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 248 points and 326 comments. The source actually reported 316 points and 416 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 324 points · 433 comments → ·
- 08188pts106comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 188 points and 106 comments. The source actually reported 283 points and 160 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 349 points · 227 comments → ·
- 09145pts57comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 145 points and 57 comments. The source actually reported 311 points and 122 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 511 points · 5 comments → ·
- 10188pts73comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 188 points and 73 comments. The source actually reported 254 points and 99 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 524 points · 487 comments → ·
- 11340pts80comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 340 points and 80 comments. The source actually reported 341 points and 80 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 438 points · 103 comments → ·
- 1286pts14comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 86 points and 14 comments. The source actually reported 88 points and 14 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 98 points · 14 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 8 comments - 13131pts57comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 131 points and 57 comments. The source actually reported 179 points and 92 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 353 points · 198 comments → ·
- 1487pts158comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 87 points and 158 comments. The source actually reported 87 points and 159 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 88 points · 159 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 7 comments - 15128pts121comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 128 points and 121 comments. The source actually reported 129 points and 122 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 144 points · 153 comments → ·
- 16141pts130comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 141 points and 130 comments. The source actually reported 141 points and 130 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 143 points · 134 comments → ·
Edition progress · 16/20 selections generated
Top 10: every 2 h 24 min. Top 20: every 1 h 12 min. UTC. Recovered gaps are marked estimated; gaps without eligible coverage remain missed.
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- pending
- pending
- pending
- pending