Search
Daily ranking · strictly above medianSearching all collected daily editions.
27 MATCHES
Welcome. On your next visit, NEW badges highlight picks added since you last read.
- 01947pts619comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 947 points and 619 comments. The source actually reported 947 points and 619 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 948 points · 620 comments → ·
- 02436pts285comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 436 points and 285 comments. The source actually reported 947 points and 619 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 948 points · 620 comments → ·
- 03246pts161comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 246 points and 161 comments. The source actually reported 947 points and 619 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 948 points · 620 comments → ·
- 04616pts396comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 616 points and 396 comments. The source actually reported 793 points and 510 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 793 points · 510 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 12 comments - 05536pts591comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 536 points and 591 comments. The source actually reported 911 points and 1005 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 911 points · 1005 comments → ·
- 06172pts189comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 172 points and 189 comments. The source actually reported 911 points and 1005 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 911 points · 1005 comments → ·
- 07180pts116comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 180 points and 116 comments. The source actually reported 793 points and 510 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 793 points · 510 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 12 comments - 08380pts281comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 380 points and 281 comments. The source actually reported 392 points and 290 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 392 points · 290 comments → ·
- 09184pts136comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 184 points and 136 comments. The source actually reported 392 points and 290 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 392 points · 290 comments → ·
- 10310pts221comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 310 points and 221 comments. The source actually reported 439 points and 313 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 439 points · 313 comments → ·
- 1191pts65comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 91 points and 65 comments. The source actually reported 439 points and 313 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 439 points · 313 comments → ·
- 1259pts17comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 59 points and 17 comments. The source actually reported 141 points and 40 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 141 points · 40 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 1 comments - 13305pts113comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 305 points and 113 comments. The source actually reported 346 points and 128 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 346 points · 128 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 0 comments - 1455pts23comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 55 points and 23 comments. The source actually reported 59 points and 25 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 59 points · 25 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 1 comments - 1528pts12comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 28 points and 12 comments. The source actually reported 59 points and 25 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 59 points · 25 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 1 comments - 1620pts29comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 20 points and 29 comments. The source actually reported 20 points and 29 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 20 points · 29 comments → ·
- 1720pts29comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 20 points and 29 comments. The source actually reported 20 points and 29 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 20 points · 29 comments → ·
- 185pts8comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 8 comments. The source actually reported 20 points and 29 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 20 points · 29 comments → ·
- 197pts9comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 9 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 9 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 9 comments → ·
- 207pts9comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 9 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 9 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 9 comments → ·
- 215pts6comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 6 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 9 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 9 comments → ·
- 2233pts11comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 33 points and 11 comments. The source actually reported 33 points and 11 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 33 points · 11 comments → ·
- 237pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 2 comments → ·
- 2433pts11comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 33 points and 11 comments. The source actually reported 33 points and 11 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 33 points · 11 comments → ·
- 257pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 2 comments → ·
- 2623pts8comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 23 points and 8 comments. The source actually reported 33 points and 11 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 33 points · 11 comments → ·
- 278pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 33 points and 11 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 33 points · 11 comments → ·