Search
Searching all collected daily editions.
50 MATCHES · MORE AVAILABLE
Welcome. On your next visit, NEW badges highlight picks added since you last read.
- 251524pts128comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 524 points and 128 comments. The source actually reported 524 points and 128 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 524 points · 128 comments → ·
- 252174pts349comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 174 points and 349 comments. The source actually reported 423 points and 850 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 423 points · 850 comments → ·
- 253261pts430comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 261 points and 430 comments. The source actually reported 497 points and 818 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 497 points · 818 comments → ·
- 254463pts218comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 463 points and 218 comments. The source actually reported 713 points and 336 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 713 points · 336 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 5 comments - 255144pts38comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 144 points and 38 comments. The source actually reported 326 points and 86 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 326 points · 86 comments → ·
- 25694pts75comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 94 points and 75 comments. The source actually reported 392 points and 312 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 392 points · 312 comments → ·
- 25768pts137comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 68 points and 137 comments. The source actually reported 423 points and 850 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 423 points · 850 comments → ·
- 258368pts107comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 368 points and 107 comments. The source actually reported 368 points and 107 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 368 points · 107 comments → ·
- 259112pts185comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 112 points and 185 comments. The source actually reported 497 points and 818 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 497 points · 818 comments → ·
- 260298pts206comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 298 points and 206 comments. The source actually reported 319 points and 221 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 319 points · 221 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 40 comments - 26173pts28comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 73 points and 28 comments. The source actually reported 73 points and 28 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 73 points · 28 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 89 comments - 262178pts84comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 178 points and 84 comments. The source actually reported 713 points and 336 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 713 points · 336 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 5 comments - 263100pts12comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 100 points and 12 comments. The source actually reported 100 points and 12 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 100 points · 12 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 21 comments - 264190pts46comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 190 points and 46 comments. The source actually reported 524 points and 128 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 524 points · 128 comments → ·
- 265193pts58comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 193 points and 58 comments. The source actually reported 468 points and 140 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 468 points · 140 comments → ·
- 266385pts79comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 385 points and 79 comments. The source actually reported 411 points and 84 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 411 points · 84 comments → ·
- 26759pts17comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 59 points and 17 comments. The source actually reported 141 points and 40 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 141 points · 40 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 1 comments - 268417pts228comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 417 points and 228 comments. The source actually reported 417 points and 228 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 417 points · 228 comments → ·
- 2691705pts1199comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1705 points and 1199 comments. The source actually reported 1705 points and 1199 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1705 points · 1199 comments → ·
- 270232pts137comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 232 points and 137 comments. The source actually reported 574 points and 340 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 574 points · 340 comments → ·
- 271583pts411comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 583 points and 411 comments. The source actually reported 583 points and 411 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 583 points · 411 comments → ·
- 272814pts418comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 814 points and 418 comments. The source actually reported 814 points and 418 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 814 points · 418 comments → ·
- 2731689pts609comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1689 points and 609 comments. The source actually reported 1689 points and 609 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1689 points · 610 comments → ·
- 274305pts113comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 305 points and 113 comments. The source actually reported 346 points and 128 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 346 points · 128 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 0 comments - 275226pts326comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 226 points and 326 comments. The source actually reported 260 points and 375 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 260 points · 375 comments → ·
- 276345pts100comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 345 points and 100 comments. The source actually reported 392 points and 114 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 392 points · 114 comments → ·
- 277375pts196comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 375 points and 196 comments. The source actually reported 375 points and 196 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 375 points · 196 comments → ·
- 278278pts152comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 278 points and 152 comments. The source actually reported 417 points and 228 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 417 points · 228 comments → ·
- 279290pts281comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 290 points and 281 comments. The source actually reported 354 points and 343 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 354 points · 343 comments → ·
- 280144pts58comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 144 points and 58 comments. The source actually reported 144 points and 58 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 144 points · 58 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 31 comments - 281408pts61comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 408 points and 61 comments. The source actually reported 515 points and 77 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 515 points · 77 comments → ·
- 282417pts380comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 417 points and 380 comments. The source actually reported 417 points and 380 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 417 points · 380 comments → ·
- 283336pts77comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 336 points and 77 comments. The source actually reported 592 points and 136 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 592 points · 136 comments → ·
- 284366pts409comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 366 points and 409 comments. The source actually reported 400 points and 446 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 400 points · 446 comments → ·
- 285253pts178comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 253 points and 178 comments. The source actually reported 583 points and 411 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 583 points · 411 comments → ·
- 286399pts104comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 399 points and 104 comments. The source actually reported 681 points and 177 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 681 points · 177 comments → ·
- 287398pts135comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 398 points and 135 comments. The source actually reported 642 points and 218 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 642 points · 218 comments → ·
- 288258pts133comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 258 points and 133 comments. The source actually reported 814 points and 418 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 814 points · 418 comments → ·
- 289470pts132comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 470 points and 132 comments. The source actually reported 634 points and 178 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 634 points · 178 comments → ·
- 290259pts238comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 259 points and 238 comments. The source actually reported 583 points and 536 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 583 points · 536 comments → ·
Also discussed: Programming.dev · 25 comments Lobsters · 73 comments - 291482pts174comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 482 points and 174 comments. The source actually reported 1689 points and 609 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1689 points · 610 comments → ·
- 2921705pts1199comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1705 points and 1199 comments. The source actually reported 1705 points and 1199 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1705 points · 1199 comments → ·
- 293206pts70comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 206 points and 70 comments. The source actually reported 642 points and 218 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 642 points · 218 comments → ·
- 294142pts131comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 142 points and 131 comments. The source actually reported 583 points and 536 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 583 points · 536 comments → ·
Also discussed: Programming.dev · 25 comments Lobsters · 73 comments - 295144pts52comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 144 points and 52 comments. The source actually reported 1689 points and 609 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1689 points · 610 comments → ·
- 296126pts141comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 126 points and 141 comments. The source actually reported 400 points and 446 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 400 points · 446 comments → ·
- 297138pts126comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 138 points and 126 comments. The source actually reported 417 points and 380 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 417 points · 380 comments → ·
- 29855pts22comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 55 points and 22 comments. The source actually reported 144 points and 58 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 144 points · 58 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 31 comments - 299153pts43comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 153 points and 43 comments. The source actually reported 634 points and 178 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 634 points · 178 comments → ·
- 300224pts119comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 224 points and 119 comments. The source actually reported 307 points and 163 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 307 points · 163 comments → ·