Search
Searching all collected daily editions.
50 MATCHES · MORE AVAILABLE
Welcome. On your next visit, NEW badges highlight picks added since you last read.
- 301226pts326comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 226 points and 326 comments. The source actually reported 260 points and 375 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 260 points · 375 comments → ·
- 302345pts100comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 345 points and 100 comments. The source actually reported 392 points and 114 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 392 points · 114 comments → ·
- 303375pts196comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 375 points and 196 comments. The source actually reported 375 points and 196 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 375 points · 196 comments → ·
- 304278pts152comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 278 points and 152 comments. The source actually reported 417 points and 228 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 417 points · 228 comments → ·
- 305290pts281comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 290 points and 281 comments. The source actually reported 354 points and 343 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 354 points · 343 comments → ·
- 306144pts58comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 144 points and 58 comments. The source actually reported 144 points and 58 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 144 points · 58 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 31 comments - 307335pts146comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 335 points and 146 comments. The source actually reported 415 points and 181 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 415 points · 181 comments → ·
- 308408pts61comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 408 points and 61 comments. The source actually reported 515 points and 77 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 515 points · 77 comments → ·
- 309417pts380comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 417 points and 380 comments. The source actually reported 417 points and 380 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 417 points · 380 comments → ·
- 310336pts77comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 336 points and 77 comments. The source actually reported 592 points and 136 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 592 points · 136 comments → ·
- 311366pts409comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 366 points and 409 comments. The source actually reported 400 points and 446 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 400 points · 446 comments → ·
- 312253pts178comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 253 points and 178 comments. The source actually reported 583 points and 411 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 583 points · 411 comments → ·
- 313399pts104comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 399 points and 104 comments. The source actually reported 681 points and 177 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 681 points · 177 comments → ·
- 314398pts135comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 398 points and 135 comments. The source actually reported 642 points and 218 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 642 points · 218 comments → ·
- 315258pts133comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 258 points and 133 comments. The source actually reported 814 points and 418 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 814 points · 418 comments → ·
- 316470pts132comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 470 points and 132 comments. The source actually reported 634 points and 178 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 634 points · 178 comments → ·
- 317259pts238comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 259 points and 238 comments. The source actually reported 583 points and 536 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 583 points · 536 comments → ·
Also discussed: Programming.dev · 25 comments Lobsters · 73 comments - 318482pts174comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 482 points and 174 comments. The source actually reported 1689 points and 609 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1689 points · 610 comments → ·
- 3191705pts1199comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1705 points and 1199 comments. The source actually reported 1705 points and 1199 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1705 points · 1199 comments → ·
- 320206pts70comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 206 points and 70 comments. The source actually reported 642 points and 218 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 642 points · 218 comments → ·
- 321142pts131comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 142 points and 131 comments. The source actually reported 583 points and 536 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 583 points · 536 comments → ·
Also discussed: Programming.dev · 25 comments Lobsters · 73 comments - 322144pts52comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 144 points and 52 comments. The source actually reported 1689 points and 609 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1689 points · 610 comments → ·
- 323126pts141comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 126 points and 141 comments. The source actually reported 400 points and 446 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 400 points · 446 comments → ·
- 324138pts126comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 138 points and 126 comments. The source actually reported 417 points and 380 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 417 points · 380 comments → ·
- 32555pts22comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 55 points and 22 comments. The source actually reported 144 points and 58 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 144 points · 58 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 31 comments - 326153pts43comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 153 points and 43 comments. The source actually reported 634 points and 178 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 634 points · 178 comments → ·
- 327224pts119comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 224 points and 119 comments. The source actually reported 307 points and 163 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 307 points · 163 comments → ·
- 328182pts168comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 182 points and 168 comments. The source actually reported 414 points and 382 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 414 points · 382 comments → ·
- 329374pts161comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 374 points and 161 comments. The source actually reported 397 points and 171 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 397 points · 171 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 0 comments - 330324pts613comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 324 points and 613 comments. The source actually reported 340 points and 643 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 340 points · 643 comments → ·
- 331326pts367comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 326 points and 367 comments. The source actually reported 413 points and 465 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 413 points · 465 comments → ·
- 332360pts338comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 360 points and 338 comments. The source actually reported 483 points and 454 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 483 points · 454 comments → ·
- 333448pts477comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 448 points and 477 comments. The source actually reported 468 points and 499 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 468 points · 499 comments → ·
- 33455pts23comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 55 points and 23 comments. The source actually reported 59 points and 25 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 59 points · 25 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 1 comments - 335499pts371comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 499 points and 371 comments. The source actually reported 525 points and 391 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 525 points · 391 comments → ·
- 336540pts286comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 540 points and 286 comments. The source actually reported 687 points and 363 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 687 points · 363 comments → ·
- 337926pts394comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 926 points and 394 comments. The source actually reported 926 points and 394 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 926 points · 394 comments → ·
- 3381067pts955comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1067 points and 955 comments. The source actually reported 1067 points and 955 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1067 points · 955 comments → ·
- 339364pts256comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 364 points and 256 comments. The source actually reported 1705 points and 1199 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1705 points · 1199 comments → ·
- 340154pts292comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 154 points and 292 comments. The source actually reported 340 points and 643 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 340 points · 643 comments → ·
- 341142pts134comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 142 points and 134 comments. The source actually reported 483 points and 454 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 483 points · 454 comments → ·
- 342108pts76comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 108 points and 76 comments. The source actually reported 1705 points and 1199 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1705 points · 1199 comments → ·
- 34328pts12comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 28 points and 12 comments. The source actually reported 59 points and 25 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 59 points · 25 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 1 comments - 344190pts203comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 190 points and 203 comments. The source actually reported 468 points and 499 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 468 points · 499 comments → ·
- 345231pts122comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 231 points and 122 comments. The source actually reported 687 points and 363 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 687 points · 363 comments → ·
- 346210pts156comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 210 points and 156 comments. The source actually reported 525 points and 391 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 525 points · 391 comments → ·
- 347142pts19comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 142 points and 19 comments. The source actually reported 142 points and 19 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 142 points · 19 comments → ·
- 348388pts397comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 388 points and 397 comments. The source actually reported 388 points and 397 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 388 points · 397 comments → ·
- 349309pts240comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 309 points and 240 comments. The source actually reported 393 points and 305 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 393 points · 305 comments → ·
- 350440pts325comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 440 points and 325 comments. The source actually reported 492 points and 364 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 492 points · 364 comments → ·