Search
Searching all collected daily editions.
50 MATCHES · MORE AVAILABLE
Welcome. On your next visit, NEW badges highlight picks added since you last read.
- 351399pts277comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 399 points and 277 comments. The source actually reported 884 points and 613 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 884 points · 613 comments → ·
- 352475pts480comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 475 points and 480 comments. The source actually reported 945 points and 956 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 945 points · 956 comments → ·
- 3531092pts459comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1092 points and 459 comments. The source actually reported 1092 points and 459 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1092 points · 459 comments → ·
- 3542017pts1125comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 2017 points and 1125 comments. The source actually reported 2017 points and 1125 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 2017 points · 1125 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 14 comments - 355240pts137comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 240 points and 137 comments. The source actually reported 712 points and 405 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 712 points · 405 comments → ·
- 356178pts123comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 178 points and 123 comments. The source actually reported 884 points and 613 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 884 points · 613 comments → ·
- 357188pts176comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 188 points and 176 comments. The source actually reported 585 points and 547 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 585 points · 547 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 0 comments - 358191pts194comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 191 points and 194 comments. The source actually reported 945 points and 956 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 945 points · 956 comments → ·
- 35989pts17comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 89 points and 17 comments. The source actually reported 89 points and 17 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 89 points · 17 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 65 comments - 36043pts10comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 43 points and 10 comments. The source actually reported 130 points and 31 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 130 points · 31 comments → ·
- 36142pts30comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 42 points and 30 comments. The source actually reported 84 points and 60 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 84 points · 60 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 83 comments - 362278pts124comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 278 points and 124 comments. The source actually reported 278 points and 124 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 278 points · 124 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 5 comments - 363107pts97comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 107 points and 97 comments. The source actually reported 442 points and 401 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 442 points · 401 comments → ·
- 364246pts107comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 246 points and 107 comments. The source actually reported 320 points and 139 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 320 points · 139 comments → ·
- 365238pts78comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 238 points and 78 comments. The source actually reported 358 points and 118 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 358 points · 118 comments → ·
- 366245pts133comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 245 points and 133 comments. The source actually reported 327 points and 178 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 327 points · 178 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 25 comments - 367304pts192comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 304 points and 192 comments. The source actually reported 386 points and 244 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 386 points · 244 comments → ·
- 368265pts180comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 265 points and 180 comments. The source actually reported 396 points and 269 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 396 points · 269 comments → ·
- 369233pts98comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 233 points and 98 comments. The source actually reported 1092 points and 459 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1092 points · 459 comments → ·
- 370123pts51comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 123 points and 51 comments. The source actually reported 194 points and 80 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 194 points · 80 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 346 comments - 371371pts238comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 371 points and 238 comments. The source actually reported 472 points and 303 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 472 points · 303 comments → ·
- 372529pts523comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 529 points and 523 comments. The source actually reported 632 points and 625 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 632 points · 625 comments → ·
- 373419pts234comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 419 points and 234 comments. The source actually reported 2017 points and 1125 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 2017 points · 1125 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 14 comments - 37497pts53comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 97 points and 53 comments. The source actually reported 327 points and 178 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 327 points · 178 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 25 comments - 375107pts73comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 107 points and 73 comments. The source actually reported 396 points and 269 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 396 points · 269 comments → ·
- 376116pts65comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 116 points and 65 comments. The source actually reported 2017 points and 1125 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 2017 points · 1125 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 14 comments - 377140pts66comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 140 points and 66 comments. The source actually reported 212 points and 100 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 212 points · 100 comments → ·
- 37853pts34comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 53 points and 34 comments. The source actually reported 386 points and 244 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 386 points · 244 comments → ·
- 37917pts7comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 17 points and 7 comments. The source actually reported 194 points and 80 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 194 points · 80 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 346 comments - 38029pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 29 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 58 points and 10 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 58 points · 10 comments → ·
- 381128pts44comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 128 points and 44 comments. The source actually reported 263 points and 91 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 263 points · 91 comments → ·
- 382254pts91comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 254 points and 91 comments. The source actually reported 324 points and 116 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 324 points · 116 comments → ·
- 38364pts41comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 64 points and 41 comments. The source actually reported 472 points and 303 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 472 points · 303 comments → ·
- 38419pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 19 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 102 points and 14 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 102 points · 14 comments → ·
- 38586pts85comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 86 points and 85 comments. The source actually reported 632 points and 625 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 632 points · 625 comments → ·
- 38623pts15comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 23 points and 15 comments. The source actually reported 66 points and 43 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 66 points · 43 comments → ·
- 387136pts273comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 136 points and 273 comments. The source actually reported 207 points and 415 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 207 points · 415 comments → ·
- 388105pts320comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 105 points and 320 comments. The source actually reported 206 points and 626 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 206 points · 626 comments → ·
- 389201pts58comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 201 points and 58 comments. The source actually reported 415 points and 119 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 415 points · 119 comments → ·
- 39017pts17comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 17 points and 17 comments. The source actually reported 61 points and 59 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 61 points · 59 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 47 comments - 391198pts91comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 198 points and 91 comments. The source actually reported 402 points and 185 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 402 points · 185 comments → ·
- 392229pts91comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 229 points and 91 comments. The source actually reported 611 points and 243 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 611 points · 243 comments → ·
- 3936pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 30 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 30 points · 3 comments → ·
- 3945pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 61 points and 59 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 61 points · 59 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 47 comments - 39576pts22comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 76 points and 22 comments. The source actually reported 415 points and 119 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 415 points · 119 comments → ·
- 39623pts70comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 23 points and 70 comments. The source actually reported 206 points and 626 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 206 points · 626 comments → ·
- 39776pts30comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 76 points and 30 comments. The source actually reported 611 points and 243 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 611 points · 243 comments → ·
- 3988pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 48 points and 7 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 48 points · 7 comments → ·
- 39912pts24comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 12 points and 24 comments. The source actually reported 207 points and 415 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 207 points · 415 comments → ·
- 40017pts8comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 17 points and 8 comments. The source actually reported 402 points and 185 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 402 points · 185 comments → ·