Search
Searching all collected daily editions.
50 MATCHES · MORE AVAILABLE
Welcome. On your next visit, NEW badges highlight picks added since you last read.
- 51707pts296comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 707 points and 296 comments. The source actually reported 746 points and 313 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 746 points · 314 comments → ·
- 52409pts497comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 409 points and 497 comments. The source actually reported 666 points and 809 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 668 points · 812 comments → ·
- 53436pts285comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 436 points and 285 comments. The source actually reported 947 points and 619 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 948 points · 620 comments → ·
- 54712pts573comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 712 points and 573 comments. The source actually reported 943 points and 759 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 944 points · 759 comments → ·
- 55562pts138comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 562 points and 138 comments. The source actually reported 1940 points and 476 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1949 points · 478 comments → ·
- 561462pts1042comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1462 points and 1042 comments. The source actually reported 1462 points and 1042 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1463 points · 1042 comments → ·
- 57246pts161comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 246 points and 161 comments. The source actually reported 947 points and 619 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 948 points · 620 comments → ·
- 58271pts67comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 271 points and 67 comments. The source actually reported 1940 points and 476 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1949 points · 478 comments → ·
- 59176pts214comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 176 points and 214 comments. The source actually reported 666 points and 809 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 668 points · 812 comments → ·
- 6051pts14comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 51 points and 14 comments. The source actually reported 131 points and 35 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 131 points · 35 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 3 comments - 61230pts255comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 230 points and 255 comments. The source actually reported 419 points and 465 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 419 points · 470 comments → ·
- 62248pts123comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 248 points and 123 comments. The source actually reported 509 points and 252 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 509 points · 252 comments → ·
- 63465pts218comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 465 points and 218 comments. The source actually reported 465 points and 218 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 465 points · 218 comments → ·
- 64222pts93comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 222 points and 93 comments. The source actually reported 746 points and 313 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 746 points · 314 comments → ·
- 65194pts156comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 194 points and 156 comments. The source actually reported 943 points and 759 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 944 points · 759 comments → ·
- 66345pts654comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 345 points and 654 comments. The source actually reported 347 points and 658 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 347 points · 658 comments → ·
- 67400pts113comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 400 points and 113 comments. The source actually reported 571 points and 161 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 571 points · 161 comments → ·
- 68339pts615comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 339 points and 615 comments. The source actually reported 415 points and 754 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 415 points · 754 comments → ·
- 69848pts251comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 848 points and 251 comments. The source actually reported 848 points and 251 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 855 points · 253 comments → ·
- 70327pts272comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 327 points and 272 comments. The source actually reported 653 points and 543 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 653 points · 543 comments → ·
- 71622pts262comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 622 points and 262 comments. The source actually reported 778 points and 328 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 778 points · 330 comments → ·
- 7262pts50comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 62 points and 50 comments. The source actually reported 96 points and 78 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 96 points · 78 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 159 comments - 73570pts338comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 570 points and 338 comments. The source actually reported 746 points and 442 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 746 points · 442 comments → ·
Also discussed: Programming.dev · 9 comments - 74461pts556comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 461 points and 556 comments. The source actually reported 759 points and 917 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 760 points · 917 comments → ·
- 75392pts445comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 392 points and 445 comments. The source actually reported 890 points and 1010 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 891 points · 1010 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 35 comments - 76557pts397comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 557 points and 397 comments. The source actually reported 1462 points and 1042 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1463 points · 1042 comments → ·
- 77152pts276comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 152 points and 276 comments. The source actually reported 415 points and 754 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 415 points · 754 comments → ·
- 78244pts139comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 244 points and 139 comments. The source actually reported 462 points and 264 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 462 points · 264 comments → ·
- 79214pts243comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 214 points and 243 comments. The source actually reported 890 points and 1010 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 891 points · 1010 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 35 comments - 80272pts115comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 272 points and 115 comments. The source actually reported 778 points and 328 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 778 points · 330 comments → ·
- 81192pts137comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 192 points and 137 comments. The source actually reported 1462 points and 1042 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1463 points · 1042 comments → ·
- 82157pts190comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 157 points and 190 comments. The source actually reported 759 points and 917 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 760 points · 917 comments → ·
- 83197pts117comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 197 points and 117 comments. The source actually reported 746 points and 442 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 746 points · 442 comments → ·
Also discussed: Programming.dev · 9 comments - 84330pts462comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 330 points and 462 comments. The source actually reported 349 points and 489 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 349 points · 489 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 18 comments - 85418pts479comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 418 points and 479 comments. The source actually reported 418 points and 479 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 418 points · 479 comments → ·
- 86623pts205comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 623 points and 205 comments. The source actually reported 623 points and 205 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 623 points · 205 comments → ·
- 87334pts99comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 334 points and 99 comments. The source actually reported 848 points and 251 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 855 points · 253 comments → ·
- 88414pts199comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 414 points and 199 comments. The source actually reported 609 points and 293 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 609 points · 293 comments → ·
- 89470pts267comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 470 points and 267 comments. The source actually reported 671 points and 381 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 671 points · 381 comments → ·
- 90455pts250comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 455 points and 250 comments. The source actually reported 674 points and 370 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 674 points · 370 comments → ·
- 91318pts241comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 318 points and 241 comments. The source actually reported 802 points and 607 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 802 points · 607 comments → ·
- 92410pts187comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 410 points and 187 comments. The source actually reported 714 points and 326 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 714 points · 326 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 9 comments - 93616pts396comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 616 points and 396 comments. The source actually reported 793 points and 510 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 793 points · 510 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 12 comments - 941142pts576comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1142 points and 576 comments. The source actually reported 1142 points and 576 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1142 points · 576 comments → ·
- 95536pts591comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 536 points and 591 comments. The source actually reported 911 points and 1005 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 911 points · 1005 comments → ·
- 96931pts659comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 931 points and 659 comments. The source actually reported 978 points and 693 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 978 points · 697 comments → ·
- 97201pts114comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 201 points and 114 comments. The source actually reported 671 points and 381 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 671 points · 381 comments → ·
- 98185pts102comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 185 points and 102 comments. The source actually reported 674 points and 370 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 674 points · 370 comments → ·
- 99160pts73comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 160 points and 73 comments. The source actually reported 714 points and 326 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 714 points · 326 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 9 comments - 100144pts165comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 144 points and 165 comments. The source actually reported 418 points and 479 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 418 points · 479 comments → ·