Archived daily edition
Daily ranking · strictly above median
Welcome. On your next visit, NEW badges highlight picks added since you last read.
- 011392pts2503comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1392 points and 2503 comments. The source actually reported 1488 points and 2675 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1488 points · 2675 comments → ·
- 02911pts469comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 911 points and 469 comments. The source actually reported 911 points and 469 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 911 points · 469 comments → ·
- 03647pts424comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 647 points and 424 comments. The source actually reported 647 points and 424 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 647 points · 424 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 49 comments - 04254pts94comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 254 points and 94 comments. The source actually reported 918 points and 339 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 918 points · 339 comments → ·
- 05805pts329comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 805 points and 329 comments. The source actually reported 805 points and 329 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 805 points · 329 comments → ·
- 061940pts476comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1940 points and 476 comments. The source actually reported 1940 points and 476 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1940 points · 476 comments → ·
- 07183pts156comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 183 points and 156 comments. The source actually reported 538 points and 458 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 538 points · 458 comments → ·
- 08635pts250comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 635 points and 250 comments. The source actually reported 635 points and 250 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 635 points · 250 comments → ·
- 09455pts167comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 455 points and 167 comments. The source actually reported 455 points and 167 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 455 points · 167 comments → ·
- 10686pts279comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 686 points and 279 comments. The source actually reported 686 points and 279 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 686 points · 279 comments → ·