Search
Searching all collected daily editions.
50 MATCHES · MORE AVAILABLE
Welcome. On your next visit, NEW badges highlight picks added since you last read.
- 01141pts130comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 141 points and 130 comments. The source actually reported 141 points and 130 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 143 points · 134 comments → ·
- 02128pts121comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 128 points and 121 comments. The source actually reported 129 points and 122 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 144 points · 153 comments → ·
- 0387pts158comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 87 points and 158 comments. The source actually reported 87 points and 159 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 88 points · 159 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 7 comments - 04131pts57comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 131 points and 57 comments. The source actually reported 179 points and 92 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 353 points · 198 comments → ·
- 0586pts14comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 86 points and 14 comments. The source actually reported 88 points and 14 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 98 points · 14 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 8 comments - 06340pts80comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 340 points and 80 comments. The source actually reported 341 points and 80 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 438 points · 103 comments → ·
- 07188pts73comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 188 points and 73 comments. The source actually reported 254 points and 99 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 524 points · 487 comments → ·
- 08145pts57comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 145 points and 57 comments. The source actually reported 311 points and 122 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 511 points · 5 comments → ·
- 09188pts106comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 188 points and 106 comments. The source actually reported 283 points and 160 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 349 points · 227 comments → ·
- 10248pts326comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 248 points and 326 comments. The source actually reported 316 points and 416 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 324 points · 433 comments → ·
- 11647pts424comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 647 points and 424 comments. The source actually reported 647 points and 424 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 651 points · 425 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 49 comments - 12233pts217comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 233 points and 217 comments. The source actually reported 388 points and 362 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 446 points · 438 comments → ·
- 13312pts265comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 312 points and 265 comments. The source actually reported 538 points and 458 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 581 points · 525 comments → ·
- 14911pts469comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 911 points and 469 comments. The source actually reported 911 points and 469 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 913 points · 474 comments → ·
- 15374pts138comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 374 points and 138 comments. The source actually reported 918 points and 339 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1001 points · 371 comments → ·
- 161467pts2636comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1467 points and 2636 comments. The source actually reported 1488 points and 2675 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1590 points · 2893 comments → ·
- 17130pts171comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 130 points and 171 comments. The source actually reported 316 points and 416 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 324 points · 433 comments → ·
- 18151pts129comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 151 points and 129 comments. The source actually reported 538 points and 458 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 581 points · 525 comments → ·
- 19134pts49comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 134 points and 49 comments. The source actually reported 918 points and 339 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1001 points · 371 comments → ·
- 2062pts114comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 62 points and 114 comments. The source actually reported 85 points and 156 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 88 points · 159 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 7 comments - 21883pts386comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 883 points and 386 comments. The source actually reported 883 points and 386 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 884 points · 390 comments → ·
- 22947pts619comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 947 points and 619 comments. The source actually reported 947 points and 619 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 948 points · 620 comments → ·
- 23341pts352comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 341 points and 352 comments. The source actually reported 341 points and 352 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 342 points · 355 comments → ·
- 24303pts111comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 303 points and 111 comments. The source actually reported 455 points and 167 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 460 points · 169 comments → ·
- 25332pts164comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 332 points and 164 comments. The source actually reported 418 points and 207 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 420 points · 208 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 5 comments - 26286pts202comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 286 points and 202 comments. The source actually reported 398 points and 281 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 400 points · 282 comments → ·
- 27362pts618comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 362 points and 618 comments. The source actually reported 390 points and 666 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 390 points · 669 comments → ·
- 28486pts192comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 486 points and 192 comments. The source actually reported 635 points and 250 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 639 points · 254 comments → ·
- 29356pts233comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 356 points and 233 comments. The source actually reported 647 points and 424 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 651 points · 425 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 49 comments - 30461pts612comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 461 points and 612 comments. The source actually reported 510 points and 678 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 518 points · 685 comments → ·
- 31509pts207comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 509 points and 207 comments. The source actually reported 686 points and 279 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 689 points · 279 comments → ·
- 32467pts191comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 467 points and 191 comments. The source actually reported 805 points and 329 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 808 points · 330 comments → ·
- 33202pts363comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 202 points and 363 comments. The source actually reported 1488 points and 2675 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1590 points · 2893 comments → ·
- 34372pts192comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 372 points and 192 comments. The source actually reported 911 points and 469 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 913 points · 474 comments → ·
- 35149pts52comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 149 points and 52 comments. The source actually reported 149 points and 52 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 149 points · 52 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 161 comments - 361940pts476comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1940 points and 476 comments. The source actually reported 1940 points and 476 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1949 points · 478 comments → ·
- 37167pts285comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 167 points and 285 comments. The source actually reported 390 points and 666 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 390 points · 669 comments → ·
- 38190pts98comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 190 points and 98 comments. The source actually reported 911 points and 469 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 913 points · 474 comments → ·
- 39186pts76comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 186 points and 76 comments. The source actually reported 805 points and 329 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 808 points · 330 comments → ·
- 40200pts81comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 200 points and 81 comments. The source actually reported 686 points and 279 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 689 points · 279 comments → ·
- 41383pts277comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 383 points and 277 comments. The source actually reported 383 points and 277 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 384 points · 277 comments → ·
- 42155pts205comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 155 points and 205 comments. The source actually reported 510 points and 678 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 518 points · 685 comments → ·
- 43356pts274comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 356 points and 274 comments. The source actually reported 385 points and 296 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 385 points · 296 comments → ·
- 44498pts144comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 498 points and 144 comments. The source actually reported 517 points and 150 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 519 points · 150 comments → ·
- 45487pts335comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 487 points and 335 comments. The source actually reported 531 points and 365 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 531 points · 365 comments → ·
- 46101pts35comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 101 points and 35 comments. The source actually reported 149 points and 52 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 149 points · 52 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 161 comments - 47399pts118comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 399 points and 118 comments. The source actually reported 693 points and 205 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 695 points · 205 comments → ·
- 48368pts524comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 368 points and 524 comments. The source actually reported 562 points and 800 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 564 points · 801 comments → ·
- 49422pts415comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 422 points and 415 comments. The source actually reported 581 points and 571 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 585 points · 571 comments → ·
- 50427pts186comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 427 points and 186 comments. The source actually reported 883 points and 386 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 884 points · 390 comments → ·