Archived daily edition
Daily ranking · strictly above median
Welcome. On your next visit, NEW badges highlight picks added since you last read.
- 011362pts1539comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1362 points and 1539 comments. The source actually reported 1362 points and 1539 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1362 points · 1539 comments → ·
- 022042pts1216comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 2042 points and 1216 comments. The source actually reported 2042 points and 1216 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 2042 points · 1216 comments → ·
- 03871pts194comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 871 points and 194 comments. The source actually reported 937 points and 209 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 937 points · 209 comments → ·
- 04282pts169comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 282 points and 169 comments. The source actually reported 960 points and 575 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 960 points · 575 comments → ·
- 05261pts121comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 261 points and 121 comments. The source actually reported 1049 points and 488 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1049 points · 488 comments → ·
- 06301pts214comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 301 points and 214 comments. The source actually reported 575 points and 408 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 575 points · 408 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 14 comments - 07433pts673comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 433 points and 673 comments. The source actually reported 433 points and 673 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 433 points · 673 comments → ·
- 08241pts29comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 241 points and 29 comments. The source actually reported 2123 points and 259 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 2123 points · 259 comments → ·
- 09223pts165comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 223 points and 165 comments. The source actually reported 607 points and 449 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 607 points · 449 comments → ·
- 10586pts349comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 586 points and 349 comments. The source actually reported 586 points and 349 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 586 points · 349 comments → ·