Archived daily edition
Daily ranking · strictly above median
Welcome. On your next visit, NEW badges highlight picks added since you last read.
- 11190pts114comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 190 points and 114 comments. The source actually reported 761 points and 459 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 761 points · 459 comments → ·
- 12251pts57comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 251 points and 57 comments. The source actually reported 728 points and 165 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 728 points · 165 comments → ·
- 13299pts57comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 299 points and 57 comments. The source actually reported 625 points and 119 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 625 points · 119 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 1 comments - 14375pts326comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 375 points and 326 comments. The source actually reported 375 points and 326 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 375 points · 326 comments → ·
- 15505pts420comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 505 points and 420 comments. The source actually reported 505 points and 420 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 505 points · 420 comments → ·
- 16596pts566comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 596 points and 566 comments. The source actually reported 596 points and 566 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 596 points · 566 comments → ·
- 17393pts233comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 393 points and 233 comments. The source actually reported 393 points and 233 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 393 points · 233 comments → ·
- 18250pts42comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 250 points and 42 comments. The source actually reported 408 points and 68 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 408 points · 68 comments → ·
- 19273pts513comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 273 points and 513 comments. The source actually reported 273 points and 513 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 273 points · 513 comments → ·
- 20129pts86comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 129 points and 86 comments. The source actually reported 361 points and 239 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 361 points · 239 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 8 comments