Archived daily edition
Daily ranking · strictly above median
Welcome. On your next visit, NEW badges highlight picks added since you last read.
- 018pts8comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 8 comments. The source actually reported 61 points and 59 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 61 points · 59 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 47 comments - 0220pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 20 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 48 points and 7 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 48 points · 7 comments → ·
- 036pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 30 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 30 points · 3 comments → ·
- 04198pts79comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 198 points and 79 comments. The source actually reported 611 points and 243 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 611 points · 243 comments → ·
- 05158pts73comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 158 points and 73 comments. The source actually reported 402 points and 185 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 402 points · 185 comments → ·
- 0654pts164comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 54 points and 164 comments. The source actually reported 206 points and 626 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 206 points · 626 comments → ·
- 07118pts34comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 118 points and 34 comments. The source actually reported 415 points and 119 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 415 points · 119 comments → ·
- 0874pts149comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 74 points and 149 comments. The source actually reported 207 points and 415 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 207 points · 415 comments → ·
- 0976pts27comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 76 points and 27 comments. The source actually reported 324 points and 116 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 324 points · 116 comments → ·
- 1051pts68comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 51 points and 68 comments. The source actually reported 148 points and 195 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 148 points · 195 comments → ·
- 1155pts81comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 55 points and 81 comments. The source actually reported 132 points and 196 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 132 points · 196 comments → ·
- 1262pts43comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 62 points and 43 comments. The source actually reported 166 points and 117 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 166 points · 117 comments → ·
- 1344pts45comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 44 points and 45 comments. The source actually reported 128 points and 133 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 128 points · 133 comments → ·
- 1460pts16comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 60 points and 16 comments. The source actually reported 178 points and 48 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 178 points · 48 comments → ·
- 1528pts10comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 28 points and 10 comments. The source actually reported 149 points and 56 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 149 points · 56 comments → ·
- 1661pts31comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 61 points and 31 comments. The source actually reported 154 points and 78 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 154 points · 78 comments → ·
- 177pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 95 points and 31 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 95 points · 31 comments → ·
- 186pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 84 points and 36 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 84 points · 36 comments → ·
- 1947pts20comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 47 points and 20 comments. The source actually reported 138 points and 59 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 138 points · 59 comments → ·
- 2014pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 14 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 86 points and 15 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 86 points · 15 comments → ·
- 2115pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 15 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 89 points and 12 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 89 points · 12 comments → ·
- 2234pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 34 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 126 points and 11 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 126 points · 11 comments → ·
- 2323pts20comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 23 points and 20 comments. The source actually reported 78 points and 67 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 78 points · 67 comments → ·