Archived daily edition
Daily ranking · strictly above median
Welcome. On your next visit, NEW badges highlight picks added since you last read.
- 011362pts1539comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1362 points and 1539 comments. The source actually reported 1362 points and 1539 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1362 points · 1539 comments → ·
- 022042pts1216comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 2042 points and 1216 comments. The source actually reported 2042 points and 1216 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 2042 points · 1216 comments → ·
- 03871pts194comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 871 points and 194 comments. The source actually reported 937 points and 209 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 937 points · 209 comments → ·
- 04282pts169comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 282 points and 169 comments. The source actually reported 960 points and 575 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 960 points · 575 comments → ·
- 05261pts121comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 261 points and 121 comments. The source actually reported 1049 points and 488 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1049 points · 488 comments → ·
- 06301pts214comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 301 points and 214 comments. The source actually reported 575 points and 408 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 575 points · 408 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 14 comments - 07433pts673comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 433 points and 673 comments. The source actually reported 433 points and 673 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 433 points · 673 comments → ·
- 08241pts29comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 241 points and 29 comments. The source actually reported 2123 points and 259 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 2123 points · 259 comments → ·
- 09223pts165comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 223 points and 165 comments. The source actually reported 607 points and 449 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 607 points · 449 comments → ·
- 10586pts349comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 586 points and 349 comments. The source actually reported 586 points and 349 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 586 points · 349 comments → ·
- 11190pts114comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 190 points and 114 comments. The source actually reported 761 points and 459 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 761 points · 459 comments → ·
- 12251pts57comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 251 points and 57 comments. The source actually reported 728 points and 165 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 728 points · 165 comments → ·
- 13299pts57comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 299 points and 57 comments. The source actually reported 625 points and 119 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 625 points · 119 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 1 comments - 14375pts326comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 375 points and 326 comments. The source actually reported 375 points and 326 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 375 points · 326 comments → ·
- 15505pts420comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 505 points and 420 comments. The source actually reported 505 points and 420 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 505 points · 420 comments → ·
- 16596pts566comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 596 points and 566 comments. The source actually reported 596 points and 566 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 596 points · 566 comments → ·
- 17393pts233comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 393 points and 233 comments. The source actually reported 393 points and 233 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 393 points · 233 comments → ·
- 18250pts42comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 250 points and 42 comments. The source actually reported 408 points and 68 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 408 points · 68 comments → ·
- 19273pts513comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 273 points and 513 comments. The source actually reported 273 points and 513 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 273 points · 513 comments → ·
- 20129pts86comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 129 points and 86 comments. The source actually reported 361 points and 239 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 361 points · 239 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 8 comments - 21176pts28comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 176 points and 28 comments. The source actually reported 474 points and 76 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 474 points · 76 comments → ·
- 22348pts407comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 348 points and 407 comments. The source actually reported 348 points and 407 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 348 points · 407 comments → ·
- 23155pts67comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 155 points and 67 comments. The source actually reported 343 points and 149 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 343 points · 149 comments → ·
Also discussed: Programming.dev · 4 comments Lobsters · 53 comments - 24584pts211comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 584 points and 211 comments. The source actually reported 584 points and 211 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 584 points · 211 comments → ·
- 2581pts84comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 81 points and 84 comments. The source actually reported 378 points and 388 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 378 points · 388 comments → ·
- 2686pts158comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 86 points and 158 comments. The source actually reported 234 points and 430 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 234 points · 430 comments → ·
- 2776pts79comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 76 points and 79 comments. The source actually reported 409 points and 426 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 409 points · 426 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 8 comments - 28248pts170comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 248 points and 170 comments. The source actually reported 248 points and 170 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 248 points · 170 comments → ·
- 29262pts70comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 262 points and 70 comments. The source actually reported 286 points and 77 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 286 points · 77 comments → ·
- 30392pts290comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 392 points and 290 comments. The source actually reported 392 points and 290 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 392 points · 290 comments → ·
- 31111pts100comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 111 points and 100 comments. The source actually reported 241 points and 218 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 241 points · 218 comments → ·
- 32179pts34comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 179 points and 34 comments. The source actually reported 304 points and 57 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 304 points · 57 comments → ·
- 33242pts187comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 242 points and 187 comments. The source actually reported 242 points and 187 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 242 points · 187 comments → ·
- 34131pts59comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 131 points and 59 comments. The source actually reported 251 points and 113 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 251 points · 113 comments → ·
Also discussed: Programming.dev · 4 comments - 35471pts107comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 471 points and 107 comments. The source actually reported 471 points and 107 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 471 points · 107 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 0 comments - 36439pts45comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 439 points and 45 comments. The source actually reported 439 points and 45 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 439 points · 45 comments → ·
- 3782pts66comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 82 points and 66 comments. The source actually reported 227 points and 181 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 227 points · 181 comments → ·
- 3879pts37comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 79 points and 37 comments. The source actually reported 306 points and 144 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 306 points · 144 comments → ·
- 3993pts59comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 93 points and 59 comments. The source actually reported 222 points and 142 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 222 points · 142 comments → ·
- 40269pts153comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 269 points and 153 comments. The source actually reported 269 points and 153 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 269 points · 153 comments → ·
- 4181pts111comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 81 points and 111 comments. The source actually reported 168 points and 232 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 168 points · 232 comments → ·
- 42305pts233comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 305 points and 233 comments. The source actually reported 305 points and 233 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 305 points · 233 comments → ·
- 43355pts181comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 355 points and 181 comments. The source actually reported 355 points and 181 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 355 points · 181 comments → ·
- 44182pts76comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 182 points and 76 comments. The source actually reported 195 points and 82 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 195 points · 82 comments → ·
- 45299pts116comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 299 points and 116 comments. The source actually reported 299 points and 116 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 299 points · 116 comments → ·
- 46559pts428comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 559 points and 428 comments. The source actually reported 559 points and 428 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 559 points · 428 comments → ·
- 4769pts17comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 69 points and 17 comments. The source actually reported 348 points and 84 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 348 points · 84 comments → ·
- 48179pts151comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 179 points and 151 comments. The source actually reported 179 points and 151 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 179 points · 151 comments → ·
- 49131pts99comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 131 points and 99 comments. The source actually reported 155 points and 117 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 155 points · 117 comments → ·
- 50164pts70comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 164 points and 70 comments. The source actually reported 177 points and 76 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 177 points · 76 comments → ·
- 51134pts131comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 134 points and 131 comments. The source actually reported 144 points and 141 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 144 points · 141 comments → ·
- 5263pts46comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 63 points and 46 comments. The source actually reported 175 points and 127 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 175 points · 127 comments → ·
- 5346pts27comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 46 points and 27 comments. The source actually reported 280 points and 164 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 280 points · 164 comments → ·
- 54256pts58comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 256 points and 58 comments. The source actually reported 256 points and 58 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 256 points · 58 comments → ·
- 55156pts431comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 156 points and 431 comments. The source actually reported 156 points and 431 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 156 points · 431 comments → ·
- 5681pts32comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 81 points and 32 comments. The source actually reported 174 points and 68 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 174 points · 68 comments → ·
- 5771pts86comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 71 points and 86 comments. The source actually reported 125 points and 151 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 125 points · 151 comments → ·
- 58522pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 522 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 522 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 522 points · 5 comments → ·
- 59197pts289comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 197 points and 289 comments. The source actually reported 197 points and 289 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 197 points · 289 comments → ·
- 6063pts11comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 63 points and 11 comments. The source actually reported 239 points and 40 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 239 points · 40 comments → ·
- 61250pts71comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 250 points and 71 comments. The source actually reported 250 points and 71 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 250 points · 71 comments → ·
- 6229pts28comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 29 points and 28 comments. The source actually reported 240 points and 235 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 240 points · 235 comments → ·
- 63495pts341comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 495 points and 341 comments. The source actually reported 495 points and 341 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 495 points · 341 comments → ·
- 64187pts54comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 187 points and 54 comments. The source actually reported 187 points and 54 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 187 points · 54 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 23 comments - 6543pts20comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 43 points and 20 comments. The source actually reported 197 points and 91 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 197 points · 91 comments → ·
- 6653pts40comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 53 points and 40 comments. The source actually reported 132 points and 98 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 132 points · 98 comments → ·
- 67318pts140comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 318 points and 140 comments. The source actually reported 318 points and 140 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 318 points · 140 comments → ·
Also discussed: Programming.dev · 2 comments Lobsters · 19 comments - 68114pts41comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 114 points and 41 comments. The source actually reported 141 points and 51 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 141 points · 51 comments → ·
- 6947pts13comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 47 points and 13 comments. The source actually reported 186 points and 51 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 186 points · 51 comments → ·
- 70295pts408comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 295 points and 408 comments. The source actually reported 295 points and 408 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 295 points · 408 comments → ·
- 71840pts677comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 840 points and 677 comments. The source actually reported 840 points and 677 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 840 points · 677 comments → ·
- 72556pts173comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 556 points and 173 comments. The source actually reported 556 points and 173 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 556 points · 173 comments → ·
- 7349pts22comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 49 points and 22 comments. The source actually reported 119 points and 55 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 119 points · 55 comments → ·
- 7451pts70comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 51 points and 70 comments. The source actually reported 83 points and 114 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 83 points · 114 comments → ·
Also discussed: Programming.dev · 2 comments Lobsters · 34 comments - 75113pts83comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 113 points and 83 comments. The source actually reported 113 points and 83 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 113 points · 83 comments → ·
- 76159pts66comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 159 points and 66 comments. The source actually reported 159 points and 66 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 159 points · 66 comments → ·
- 77127pts61comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 127 points and 61 comments. The source actually reported 127 points and 61 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 127 points · 61 comments → ·
- 7849pts29comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 49 points and 29 comments. The source actually reported 98 points and 58 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 98 points · 58 comments → ·
- 79141pts133comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 141 points and 133 comments. The source actually reported 141 points and 133 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 141 points · 133 comments → ·
- 80361pts249comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 361 points and 249 comments. The source actually reported 361 points and 249 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 361 points · 249 comments → ·
- 8137pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 37 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 156 points and 16 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 156 points · 16 comments → ·
- 8257pts39comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 57 points and 39 comments. The source actually reported 85 points and 59 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 85 points · 59 comments → ·
- 83130pts131comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 130 points and 131 comments. The source actually reported 130 points and 131 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 130 points · 131 comments → ·
- 8432pts13comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 32 points and 13 comments. The source actually reported 97 points and 41 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 97 points · 41 comments → ·
- 8531pts54comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 31 points and 54 comments. The source actually reported 58 points and 101 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 58 points · 101 comments → ·
- 8628pts17comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 28 points and 17 comments. The source actually reported 85 points and 50 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 85 points · 50 comments → ·
- 8717pts6comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 17 points and 6 comments. The source actually reported 156 points and 58 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 156 points · 58 comments → ·
- 8878pts75comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 78 points and 75 comments. The source actually reported 80 points and 77 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 80 points · 77 comments → ·
- 89323pts251comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 323 points and 251 comments. The source actually reported 323 points and 251 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 323 points · 251 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 49 comments - 90183pts115comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 183 points and 115 comments. The source actually reported 183 points and 115 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 183 points · 115 comments → ·
- 9127pts18comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 27 points and 18 comments. The source actually reported 75 points and 50 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 75 points · 50 comments → ·
- 9225pts62comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 25 points and 62 comments. The source actually reported 47 points and 115 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 47 points · 115 comments → ·
- 93596pts286comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 596 points and 286 comments. The source actually reported 596 points and 286 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 596 points · 286 comments → ·
- 9421pts15comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 21 points and 15 comments. The source actually reported 73 points and 52 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 73 points · 52 comments → ·
- 95367pts182comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 367 points and 182 comments. The source actually reported 367 points and 182 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 367 points · 182 comments → ·
- 9662pts43comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 62 points and 43 comments. The source actually reported 76 points and 53 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 76 points · 53 comments → ·
- 97100pts32comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 100 points and 32 comments. The source actually reported 100 points and 32 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 100 points · 32 comments → ·
- 98159pts78comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 159 points and 78 comments. The source actually reported 159 points and 78 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 159 points · 78 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 11 comments - 9949pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 49 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 115 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 115 points · 2 comments → ·
- 10029pts7comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 29 points and 7 comments. The source actually reported 80 points and 18 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 80 points · 18 comments → ·
- 101127pts87comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 127 points and 87 comments. The source actually reported 127 points and 87 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 127 points · 87 comments → ·
- 102163pts89comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 163 points and 89 comments. The source actually reported 163 points and 89 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 163 points · 89 comments → ·
- 103119pts26comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 119 points and 26 comments. The source actually reported 119 points and 26 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 119 points · 26 comments → ·
- 10413pts24comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 13 points and 24 comments. The source actually reported 38 points and 68 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 38 points · 68 comments → ·
- 10512pts13comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 12 points and 13 comments. The source actually reported 46 points and 49 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 46 points · 49 comments → ·
- 1067pts10comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 10 comments. The source actually reported 40 points and 59 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 40 points · 59 comments → ·
- 107439pts313comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 439 points and 313 comments. The source actually reported 439 points and 313 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 439 points · 313 comments → ·
- 108102pts45comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 102 points and 45 comments. The source actually reported 102 points and 45 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 102 points · 45 comments → ·
- 1098pts11comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 11 comments. The source actually reported 41 points and 55 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 41 points · 55 comments → ·
- 11022pts7comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 22 points and 7 comments. The source actually reported 65 points and 21 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 65 points · 21 comments → ·
- 11129pts12comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 29 points and 12 comments. The source actually reported 62 points and 26 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 62 points · 26 comments → ·
- 11291pts21comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 91 points and 21 comments. The source actually reported 91 points and 21 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 91 points · 21 comments → ·
- 1136pts7comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 7 comments. The source actually reported 42 points and 47 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 42 points · 47 comments → ·
- 11479pts56comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 79 points and 56 comments. The source actually reported 79 points and 56 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 79 points · 56 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 7 comments - 11565pts123comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 65 points and 123 comments. The source actually reported 65 points and 123 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 65 points · 123 comments → ·
- 11615pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 15 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 87 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 87 points · 2 comments → ·
- 117134pts68comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 134 points and 68 comments. The source actually reported 134 points and 68 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 134 points · 68 comments → ·
- 11871pts28comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 71 points and 28 comments. The source actually reported 71 points and 28 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 71 points · 28 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 0 comments - 11919pts16comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 19 points and 16 comments. The source actually reported 46 points and 39 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 46 points · 39 comments → ·
- 1209pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 52 points and 20 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 52 points · 20 comments → ·
- 12112pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 12 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 52 points and 22 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 52 points · 22 comments → ·
- 12249pts21comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 49 points and 21 comments. The source actually reported 64 points and 27 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 64 points · 27 comments → ·
- 12362pts20comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 62 points and 20 comments. The source actually reported 72 points and 23 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 72 points · 23 comments → ·
- 12425pts9comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 25 points and 9 comments. The source actually reported 63 points and 23 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 63 points · 23 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 217 comments Hacker News · 3 comments - 125313pts115comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 313 points and 115 comments. The source actually reported 313 points and 115 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 313 points · 115 comments → ·
- 126510pts353comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 510 points and 353 comments. The source actually reported 510 points and 353 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 510 points · 353 comments → ·
- 1278pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 49 points and 14 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 49 points · 14 comments → ·
- 12810pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 45 points and 14 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 45 points · 14 comments → ·
- 1295pts23comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 23 comments. The source actually reported 15 points and 70 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 15 points · 70 comments → ·
- 13014pts12comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 14 points and 12 comments. The source actually reported 37 points and 31 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 37 points · 31 comments → ·
- 13182pts49comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 82 points and 49 comments. The source actually reported 82 points and 49 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 82 points · 49 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 8 comments - 13258pts18comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 58 points and 18 comments. The source actually reported 68 points and 21 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 68 points · 21 comments → ·
- 1335pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 40 points and 8 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 40 points · 8 comments → ·
- 13415pts11comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 15 points and 11 comments. The source actually reported 37 points and 27 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 37 points · 27 comments → ·
- 13523pts18comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 23 points and 18 comments. The source actually reported 47 points and 37 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 47 points · 37 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 90 comments - 1369pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 50 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 50 points · 1 comments → ·
- 1378pts21comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 21 comments. The source actually reported 21 points and 52 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 21 points · 52 comments → ·
- 138307pts201comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 307 points and 201 comments. The source actually reported 307 points and 201 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 307 points · 201 comments → ·
- 13917pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 17 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 53 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 53 points · 3 comments → ·
- 14017pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 17 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 73 points and 17 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 73 points · 17 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 15 comments - 14136pts25comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 36 points and 25 comments. The source actually reported 46 points and 32 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 46 points · 32 comments → ·
- 1427pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 25 points and 18 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 25 points · 18 comments → ·
- 143122pts56comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 122 points and 56 comments. The source actually reported 122 points and 56 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 122 points · 56 comments → ·
- 14428pts22comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 28 points and 22 comments. The source actually reported 41 points and 32 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 41 points · 32 comments → ·
- 1457pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 29 points and 9 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 29 points · 9 comments → ·
- 14663pts81comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 63 points and 81 comments. The source actually reported 63 points and 81 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 63 points · 81 comments → ·
- 147109pts68comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 109 points and 68 comments. The source actually reported 109 points and 68 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 109 points · 68 comments → ·
- 1488pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 27 points and 10 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 27 points · 10 comments → ·
- 14972pts40comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 72 points and 40 comments. The source actually reported 72 points and 40 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 72 points · 40 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 37 comments - 1508pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 27 points and 10 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 27 points · 10 comments → ·
- 1515pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 18 points and 17 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 18 points · 17 comments → ·
- 15234pts51comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 34 points and 51 comments. The source actually reported 38 points and 57 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 38 points · 57 comments → ·
- 153350pts390comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 350 points and 390 comments. The source actually reported 350 points and 390 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 350 points · 390 comments → ·
- 15416pts13comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 16 points and 13 comments. The source actually reported 31 points and 25 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 31 points · 25 comments → ·
- 155184pts192comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 184 points and 192 comments. The source actually reported 184 points and 192 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 184 points · 192 comments → ·
- 1565pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 19 points and 7 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 19 points · 7 comments → ·
- 15747pts25comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 47 points and 25 comments. The source actually reported 50 points and 27 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 50 points · 27 comments → ·
- 158280pts82comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 280 points and 82 comments. The source actually reported 280 points and 82 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 280 points · 82 comments → ·
- 1597pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 25 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 25 points · 0 comments → ·
- 160123pts151comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 123 points and 151 comments. The source actually reported 123 points and 151 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 123 points · 151 comments → ·
- 161294pts108comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 294 points and 108 comments. The source actually reported 294 points and 108 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 294 points · 108 comments → ·
- 1625pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 16 points and 10 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 16 points · 10 comments → ·
- 16323pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 23 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 41 points and 8 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 41 points · 8 comments → ·
- 164193pts125comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 193 points and 125 comments. The source actually reported 193 points and 125 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 193 points · 125 comments → ·
- 165110pts50comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 110 points and 50 comments. The source actually reported 110 points and 50 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 110 points · 50 comments → ·
- 16650pts15comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 50 points and 15 comments. The source actually reported 51 points and 15 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 51 points · 15 comments → ·
- 16789pts94comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 89 points and 94 comments. The source actually reported 89 points and 94 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 89 points · 94 comments → ·
- 16858pts14comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 58 points and 14 comments. The source actually reported 58 points and 14 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 58 points · 14 comments → ·
- 169350pts132comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 350 points and 132 comments. The source actually reported 350 points and 132 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 350 points · 132 comments → ·
- 17045pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 45 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 57 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 57 points · 4 comments → ·
- 1717pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 19 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 19 points · 2 comments → ·
- 172208pts30comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 208 points and 30 comments. The source actually reported 208 points and 30 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 208 points · 30 comments → ·
- 1736pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 17 points and 7 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 17 points · 7 comments → ·
- 17466pts59comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 66 points and 59 comments. The source actually reported 66 points and 59 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 66 points · 59 comments → ·
- 17520pts24comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 20 points and 24 comments. The source actually reported 27 points and 32 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 27 points · 32 comments → ·
- 1767pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 20 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 20 points · 3 comments → ·
- 1777pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 21 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 21 points · 0 comments → ·
- 17845pts47comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 45 points and 47 comments. The source actually reported 45 points and 47 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 45 points · 47 comments → ·
- 1797pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 18 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 18 points · 1 comments → ·
- 1805pts7comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 7 comments. The source actually reported 12 points and 15 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 12 points · 15 comments → ·
- 1815pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 13 points and 9 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 13 points · 9 comments → ·
- 1826pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 16 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 16 points · 1 comments → ·
- 183227pts246comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 227 points and 246 comments. The source actually reported 227 points and 246 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 227 points · 246 comments → ·
- 1846pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 15 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 15 points · 1 comments → ·
- 18513pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 13 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 41 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 41 points · 5 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 0 comments - 18652pts33comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 52 points and 33 comments. The source actually reported 52 points and 33 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 52 points · 33 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 127 comments - 1875pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 13 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 13 points · 1 comments → ·
- 18887pts39comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 87 points and 39 comments. The source actually reported 87 points and 39 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 87 points · 39 comments → ·
- 18952pts17comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 52 points and 17 comments. The source actually reported 52 points and 17 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 52 points · 17 comments → ·
- 190109pts27comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 109 points and 27 comments. The source actually reported 109 points and 27 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 109 points · 27 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 1 comments - 19146pts8comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 46 points and 8 comments. The source actually reported 49 points and 8 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 49 points · 8 comments → ·
- 1925pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 12 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 12 points · 1 comments → ·
- 19365pts34comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 65 points and 34 comments. The source actually reported 65 points and 34 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 65 points · 34 comments → ·
- 19412pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 12 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 31 points and 10 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 31 points · 10 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 1 comments - 1955pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 11 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 11 points · 3 comments → ·
- 19643pts14comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 43 points and 14 comments. The source actually reported 99 points and 32 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 99 points · 32 comments → ·
- 19761pts17comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 61 points and 17 comments. The source actually reported 61 points and 17 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 61 points · 17 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 1 comments - 1985pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 12 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 12 points · 1 comments → ·
- 19954pts19comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 54 points and 19 comments. The source actually reported 54 points and 19 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 54 points · 19 comments → ·
- 20029pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 29 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 47 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 47 points · 0 comments → ·
- 20117pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 17 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 27 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 27 points · 5 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 0 comments - 202211pts135comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 211 points and 135 comments. The source actually reported 211 points and 135 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 211 points · 135 comments → ·
- 2036pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 13 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 13 points · 2 comments → ·
- 20489pts25comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 89 points and 25 comments. The source actually reported 89 points and 25 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 89 points · 25 comments → ·
- 2058pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 15 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 15 points · 4 comments → ·
- 206300pts249comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 300 points and 249 comments. The source actually reported 300 points and 249 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 300 points · 249 comments → ·
- 2076pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 23 points and 7 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 23 points · 7 comments → ·
- 20875pts46comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 75 points and 46 comments. The source actually reported 75 points and 46 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 75 points · 46 comments → ·
- 20922pts7comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 22 points and 7 comments. The source actually reported 28 points and 9 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 28 points · 9 comments → ·
- 2107pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 23 points and 13 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 23 points · 13 comments → ·
- 2118pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 34 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 34 points · 1 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 4 comments - 2125pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 9 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 9 points · 3 comments → ·
- 21369pts36comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 69 points and 36 comments. The source actually reported 69 points and 36 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 69 points · 36 comments → ·
- 214216pts35comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 216 points and 35 comments. The source actually reported 216 points and 35 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 216 points · 35 comments → ·
- 21582pts94comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 82 points and 94 comments. The source actually reported 82 points and 94 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 82 points · 94 comments → ·
- 21619pts41comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 19 points and 41 comments. The source actually reported 19 points and 41 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 19 points · 41 comments → ·
- 21748pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 48 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 48 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 48 points · 3 comments → ·
- 2186pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 11 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 11 points · 0 comments → ·
- 21948pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 48 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 48 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 48 points · 3 comments → ·
- 22042pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 42 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 42 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 42 points · 2 comments → ·
- 22130pts27comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 30 points and 27 comments. The source actually reported 30 points and 27 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 30 points · 27 comments → ·
- 222247pts197comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 247 points and 197 comments. The source actually reported 247 points and 197 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 247 points · 197 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 14 comments - 22312pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 12 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 17 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 17 points · 3 comments → ·
- 22453pts25comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 53 points and 25 comments. The source actually reported 53 points and 25 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 53 points · 25 comments → ·
- 2255pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 9 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 9 points · 0 comments → ·
- 22636pts32comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 36 points and 32 comments. The source actually reported 36 points and 32 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 36 points · 32 comments → ·
- 227180pts102comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 180 points and 102 comments. The source actually reported 180 points and 102 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 180 points · 102 comments → ·
- 22818pts18comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 18 points and 18 comments. The source actually reported 18 points and 18 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 18 points · 18 comments → ·
- 229103pts64comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 103 points and 64 comments. The source actually reported 103 points and 64 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 103 points · 64 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 70 comments - 23020pts23comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 20 points and 23 comments. The source actually reported 20 points and 23 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 20 points · 23 comments → ·
- 23164pts44comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 64 points and 44 comments. The source actually reported 64 points and 44 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 64 points · 44 comments → ·
- 232113pts40comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 113 points and 40 comments. The source actually reported 113 points and 40 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 113 points · 40 comments → ·
- 2338pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 11 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 11 points · 5 comments → ·
- 234102pts59comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 102 points and 59 comments. The source actually reported 102 points and 59 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 102 points · 59 comments → ·
- 23512pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 12 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 15 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 15 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2368pts44comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 44 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 44 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 44 comments → ·
- 2377pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 9 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 9 points · 2 comments → ·
- 23816pts6comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 16 points and 6 comments. The source actually reported 17 points and 6 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 17 points · 6 comments → ·
- 23912pts11comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 12 points and 11 comments. The source actually reported 13 points and 12 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 13 points · 12 comments → ·
- 240305pts338comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 305 points and 338 comments. The source actually reported 305 points and 338 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 305 points · 338 comments → ·
- 24123pts11comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 23 points and 11 comments. The source actually reported 23 points and 11 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 23 points · 11 comments → ·
- 24245pts20comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 45 points and 20 comments. The source actually reported 45 points and 20 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 45 points · 20 comments → ·
- 24348pts10comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 48 points and 10 comments. The source actually reported 48 points and 10 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 48 points · 10 comments → ·
- 24434pts51comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 34 points and 51 comments. The source actually reported 34 points and 51 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 34 points · 51 comments → ·
- 24539pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 39 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 39 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 39 points · 3 comments → ·
- 2466pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 2 comments → ·
- 24727pts15comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 27 points and 15 comments. The source actually reported 27 points and 15 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 27 points · 15 comments → ·
- 24834pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 34 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 34 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 34 points · 3 comments → ·
- 24910pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 11 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 11 points · 5 comments → ·
- 25070pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 70 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 70 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 70 points · 4 comments → ·
- 25174pts8comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 74 points and 8 comments. The source actually reported 74 points and 8 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 74 points · 8 comments → ·
- 25210pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 12 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 12 points · 1 comments → ·
- 25315pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 15 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 17 points and 6 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 17 points · 6 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 0 comments - 25437pts32comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 37 points and 32 comments. The source actually reported 37 points and 32 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 37 points · 32 comments → ·
- 25519pts13comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 19 points and 13 comments. The source actually reported 19 points and 13 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 19 points · 13 comments → ·
- 25652pts12comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 52 points and 12 comments. The source actually reported 52 points and 12 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 52 points · 12 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 2 comments - 2577pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 0 comments → ·
- 25816pts35comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 16 points and 35 comments. The source actually reported 16 points and 35 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 16 points · 35 comments → ·
- 259125pts91comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 125 points and 91 comments. The source actually reported 125 points and 91 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 125 points · 91 comments → ·
- 2605pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 0 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 0 comments - 261292pts251comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 292 points and 251 comments. The source actually reported 292 points and 251 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 292 points · 251 comments → ·
- 26218pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 18 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 18 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 18 points · 3 comments → ·
- 26375pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 75 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 75 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 75 points · 0 comments → ·
- 264372pts134comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 372 points and 134 comments. The source actually reported 372 points and 134 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 372 points · 134 comments → ·
- 26531pts32comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 31 points and 32 comments. The source actually reported 31 points and 32 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 31 points · 32 comments → ·
- 2667pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 0 comments → ·
- 26710pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 14 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 14 points · 2 comments → ·
- 2685pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 0 comments → ·
- 26920pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 20 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 20 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 20 points · 2 comments → ·
- 270143pts111comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 143 points and 111 comments. The source actually reported 143 points and 111 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 143 points · 111 comments → ·
- 27146pts29comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 46 points and 29 comments. The source actually reported 46 points and 29 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 46 points · 29 comments → ·
- 27232pts25comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 32 points and 25 comments. The source actually reported 32 points and 25 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 32 points · 25 comments → ·
- 27328pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 28 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 28 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 28 points · 5 comments → ·
- 2747pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2755pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 5 comments → ·
- 2765pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 1 comments → ·
- 2775pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 2 comments → ·
- 27821pts10comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 21 points and 10 comments. The source actually reported 21 points and 10 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 21 points · 10 comments → ·
- 279176pts55comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 176 points and 55 comments. The source actually reported 176 points and 55 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 176 points · 55 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 0 comments - 280148pts53comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 148 points and 53 comments. The source actually reported 148 points and 53 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 148 points · 53 comments → ·
- 28139pts60comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 39 points and 60 comments. The source actually reported 39 points and 60 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 39 points · 60 comments → ·
- 2826pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 0 comments → ·
- 28356pts19comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 56 points and 19 comments. The source actually reported 56 points and 19 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 56 points · 19 comments → ·
- 2845pts7comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 7 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 7 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 7 comments → ·
- 2856pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 1 comments → ·
- 286206pts128comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 206 points and 128 comments. The source actually reported 206 points and 128 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 206 points · 128 comments → ·
- 28710pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 10 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 10 points · 1 comments → ·
- 28814pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 14 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 14 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 14 points · 2 comments → ·
- 28920pts10comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 20 points and 10 comments. The source actually reported 20 points and 10 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 20 points · 10 comments → ·
- 29032pts11comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 32 points and 11 comments. The source actually reported 32 points and 11 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 32 points · 11 comments → ·
Also discussed: Programming.dev · 13 comments - 29173pts70comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 73 points and 70 comments. The source actually reported 73 points and 70 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 73 points · 70 comments → ·
- 292103pts64comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 103 points and 64 comments. The source actually reported 103 points and 64 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 103 points · 64 comments → ·
- 29328pts17comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 28 points and 17 comments. The source actually reported 28 points and 17 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 28 points · 17 comments → ·
- 29480pts126comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 80 points and 126 comments. The source actually reported 80 points and 126 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 80 points · 126 comments → ·
- 295112pts58comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 112 points and 58 comments. The source actually reported 112 points and 58 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 112 points · 58 comments → ·
- 2966pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 2 comments → ·
- 29710pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 10 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 10 points · 3 comments → ·
- 298118pts131comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 118 points and 131 comments. The source actually reported 118 points and 131 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 118 points · 131 comments → ·
- 29919pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 19 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 19 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 19 points · 4 comments → ·
- 30065pts46comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 65 points and 46 comments. The source actually reported 65 points and 46 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 65 points · 46 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 0 comments - 30134pts8comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 34 points and 8 comments. The source actually reported 34 points and 8 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 34 points · 8 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 0 comments - 30224pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 24 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 24 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 24 points · 3 comments → ·
- 3039pts8comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 8 comments. The source actually reported 9 points and 8 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 9 points · 8 comments → ·
- 30425pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 25 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 25 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 25 points · 2 comments → ·
- 30510pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 10 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 10 points · 1 comments → ·
- 30691pts25comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 91 points and 25 comments. The source actually reported 91 points and 25 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 91 points · 25 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 536 comments Lobsters · 73 comments - 30723pts30comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 23 points and 30 comments. The source actually reported 23 points and 30 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 23 points · 30 comments → ·