Archived daily edition
Daily ranking · strictly above median
Welcome. On your next visit, NEW badges highlight picks added since you last read.
- 01633pts331comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 633 points and 331 comments. The source actually reported 1389 points and 726 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1389 points · 726 comments → ·
- 02642pts176comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 642 points and 176 comments. The source actually reported 1052 points and 288 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1052 points · 288 comments → ·
- 03944pts1615comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 944 points and 1615 comments. The source actually reported 944 points and 1615 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 944 points · 1615 comments → ·
- 04491pts97comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 491 points and 97 comments. The source actually reported 1446 points and 287 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1446 points · 287 comments → ·
- 05962pts185comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 962 points and 185 comments. The source actually reported 962 points and 185 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 962 points · 185 comments → ·
- 06316pts152comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 316 points and 152 comments. The source actually reported 702 points and 339 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 702 points · 339 comments → ·
- 072123pts259comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 2123 points and 259 comments. The source actually reported 2123 points and 259 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 2123 points · 259 comments → ·
- 08206pts208comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 206 points and 208 comments. The source actually reported 522 points and 528 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 522 points · 528 comments → ·
- 09778pts245comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 778 points and 245 comments. The source actually reported 778 points and 245 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 778 points · 245 comments → ·
- 10283pts146comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 283 points and 146 comments. The source actually reported 493 points and 254 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 493 points · 254 comments → ·
- 111137pts989comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1137 points and 989 comments. The source actually reported 1137 points and 989 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1137 points · 989 comments → ·
- 12571pts208comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 571 points and 208 comments. The source actually reported 571 points and 208 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 571 points · 208 comments → ·
- 13793pts309comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 793 points and 309 comments. The source actually reported 793 points and 309 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 793 points · 309 comments → ·
- 14303pts255comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 303 points and 255 comments. The source actually reported 349 points and 293 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 349 points · 293 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 0 comments - 15226pts105comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 226 points and 105 comments. The source actually reported 420 points and 195 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 420 points · 195 comments → ·
- 16408pts271comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 408 points and 271 comments. The source actually reported 408 points and 271 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 408 points · 271 comments → ·
- 17213pts134comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 213 points and 134 comments. The source actually reported 366 points and 230 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 366 points · 230 comments → ·
- 18129pts104comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 129 points and 104 comments. The source actually reported 445 points and 357 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 445 points · 357 comments → ·
- 19432pts301comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 432 points and 301 comments. The source actually reported 432 points and 301 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 432 points · 301 comments → ·
- 20191pts181comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 191 points and 181 comments. The source actually reported 282 points and 267 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 282 points · 267 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 48 comments - 21614pts655comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 614 points and 655 comments. The source actually reported 614 points and 655 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 614 points · 655 comments → ·
- 22101pts140comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 101 points and 140 comments. The source actually reported 250 points and 349 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 250 points · 349 comments → ·
- 2385pts44comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 85 points and 44 comments. The source actually reported 708 points and 363 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 708 points · 363 comments → ·
- 24187pts140comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 187 points and 140 comments. The source actually reported 241 points and 181 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 241 points · 181 comments → ·
- 251049pts488comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1049 points and 488 comments. The source actually reported 1049 points and 488 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1049 points · 488 comments → ·
- 26212pts314comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 212 points and 314 comments. The source actually reported 212 points and 314 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 212 points · 314 comments → ·
- 27124pts44comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 124 points and 44 comments. The source actually reported 317 points and 112 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 317 points · 112 comments → ·
Also discussed: Programming.dev · 3 comments Lobsters · 5 comments - 28960pts575comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 960 points and 575 comments. The source actually reported 960 points and 575 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 960 points · 575 comments → ·
- 29418pts199comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 418 points and 199 comments. The source actually reported 418 points and 199 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 418 points · 199 comments → ·
- 30166pts52comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 166 points and 52 comments. The source actually reported 241 points and 76 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 241 points · 76 comments → ·
- 31381pts612comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 381 points and 612 comments. The source actually reported 381 points and 612 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 381 points · 612 comments → ·
- 32256pts73comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 256 points and 73 comments. The source actually reported 256 points and 73 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 256 points · 73 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 2 comments - 33105pts13comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 105 points and 13 comments. The source actually reported 432 points and 55 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 432 points · 55 comments → ·
- 34130pts20comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 130 points and 20 comments. The source actually reported 306 points and 48 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 306 points · 48 comments → ·
- 35144pts226comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 144 points and 226 comments. The source actually reported 161 points and 252 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 161 points · 252 comments → ·
- 3695pts84comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 95 points and 84 comments. The source actually reported 195 points and 173 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 195 points · 173 comments → ·
- 37163pts49comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 163 points and 49 comments. The source actually reported 228 points and 69 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 228 points · 69 comments → ·
- 38336pts186comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 336 points and 186 comments. The source actually reported 336 points and 186 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 336 points · 186 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 7 comments - 3968pts90comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 68 points and 90 comments. The source actually reported 181 points and 237 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 181 points · 237 comments → ·
- 4053pts126comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 53 points and 126 comments. The source actually reported 155 points and 371 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 155 points · 371 comments → ·
- 41761pts459comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 761 points and 459 comments. The source actually reported 761 points and 459 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 761 points · 459 comments → ·
- 42148pts64comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 148 points and 64 comments. The source actually reported 196 points and 85 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 196 points · 85 comments → ·
- 4378pts42comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 78 points and 42 comments. The source actually reported 218 points and 119 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 218 points · 119 comments → ·
- 4479pts44comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 79 points and 44 comments. The source actually reported 214 points and 118 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 214 points · 118 comments → ·
- 4554pts34comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 54 points and 34 comments. The source actually reported 331 points and 210 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 331 points · 210 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 15 comments - 46262pts164comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 262 points and 164 comments. The source actually reported 262 points and 164 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 262 points · 164 comments → ·
- 4797pts48comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 97 points and 48 comments. The source actually reported 187 points and 92 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 187 points · 92 comments → ·
- 4852pts60comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 52 points and 60 comments. The source actually reported 193 points and 225 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 193 points · 225 comments → ·
- 49235pts81comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 235 points and 81 comments. The source actually reported 235 points and 81 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 235 points · 81 comments → ·
- 5052pts61comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 52 points and 61 comments. The source actually reported 148 points and 172 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 148 points · 172 comments → ·
- 51118pts150comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 118 points and 150 comments. The source actually reported 129 points and 164 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 129 points · 164 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 15 comments - 5270pts22comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 70 points and 22 comments. The source actually reported 186 points and 57 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 186 points · 57 comments → ·
- 53233pts165comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 233 points and 165 comments. The source actually reported 233 points and 165 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 233 points · 165 comments → ·
- 5455pts15comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 55 points and 15 comments. The source actually reported 208 points and 58 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 208 points · 58 comments → ·
- 5550pts18comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 50 points and 18 comments. The source actually reported 190 points and 67 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 190 points · 67 comments → ·
- 5645pts15comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 45 points and 15 comments. The source actually reported 200 points and 66 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 200 points · 66 comments → ·
- 57607pts449comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 607 points and 449 comments. The source actually reported 607 points and 449 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 607 points · 449 comments → ·
- 5851pts50comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 51 points and 50 comments. The source actually reported 106 points and 104 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 106 points · 104 comments → ·
- 59728pts165comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 728 points and 165 comments. The source actually reported 728 points and 165 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 728 points · 165 comments → ·
- 6042pts41comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 42 points and 41 comments. The source actually reported 105 points and 102 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 105 points · 102 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 22 comments - 61173pts217comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 173 points and 217 comments. The source actually reported 173 points and 217 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 173 points · 217 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 23 comments - 62301pts132comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 301 points and 132 comments. The source actually reported 301 points and 132 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 301 points · 132 comments → ·
- 6343pts63comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 43 points and 63 comments. The source actually reported 83 points and 122 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 83 points · 122 comments → ·
- 6433pts17comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 33 points and 17 comments. The source actually reported 138 points and 73 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 138 points · 73 comments → ·
- 65222pts37comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 222 points and 37 comments. The source actually reported 222 points and 37 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 222 points · 37 comments → ·
- 6638pts9comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 38 points and 9 comments. The source actually reported 163 points and 39 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 163 points · 39 comments → ·
- 67409pts426comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 409 points and 426 comments. The source actually reported 409 points and 426 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 409 points · 426 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 8 comments - 6834pts31comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 34 points and 31 comments. The source actually reported 95 points and 86 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 95 points · 86 comments → ·
- 69148pts162comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 148 points and 162 comments. The source actually reported 148 points and 162 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 148 points · 162 comments → ·
- 7018pts13comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 18 points and 13 comments. The source actually reported 214 points and 157 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 214 points · 157 comments → ·
- 7156pts15comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 56 points and 15 comments. The source actually reported 116 points and 30 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 116 points · 30 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 3 comments - 7258pts26comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 58 points and 26 comments. The source actually reported 97 points and 43 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 97 points · 43 comments → ·
- 7330pts30comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 30 points and 30 comments. The source actually reported 73 points and 74 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 73 points · 74 comments → ·
- 74106pts55comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 106 points and 55 comments. The source actually reported 106 points and 55 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 106 points · 55 comments → ·
- 75575pts408comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 575 points and 408 comments. The source actually reported 575 points and 408 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 575 points · 408 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 14 comments - 76378pts388comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 378 points and 388 comments. The source actually reported 378 points and 388 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 378 points · 388 comments → ·
- 7761pts23comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 61 points and 23 comments. The source actually reported 93 points and 35 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 93 points · 35 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 3 comments - 7826pts10comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 26 points and 10 comments. The source actually reported 103 points and 38 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 103 points · 38 comments → ·
- 79150pts20comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 150 points and 20 comments. The source actually reported 150 points and 20 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 150 points · 20 comments → ·
- 8063pts68comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 63 points and 68 comments. The source actually reported 72 points and 78 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 72 points · 78 comments → ·
- 8136pts20comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 36 points and 20 comments. The source actually reported 78 points and 44 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 78 points · 44 comments → ·
- 8291pts233comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 91 points and 233 comments. The source actually reported 91 points and 233 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 91 points · 233 comments → ·
- 8340pts6comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 40 points and 6 comments. The source actually reported 99 points and 16 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 99 points · 16 comments → ·
- 8418pts9comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 18 points and 9 comments. The source actually reported 80 points and 39 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 80 points · 39 comments → ·
- 857pts7comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 7 comments. The source actually reported 93 points and 97 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 93 points · 97 comments → ·
- 868pts10comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 10 comments. The source actually reported 62 points and 79 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 62 points · 79 comments → ·
- 8714pts12comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 14 points and 12 comments. The source actually reported 60 points and 54 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 60 points · 54 comments → ·
- 88193pts49comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 193 points and 49 comments. The source actually reported 193 points and 49 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 193 points · 49 comments → ·
- 8916pts20comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 16 points and 20 comments. The source actually reported 50 points and 61 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 50 points · 61 comments → ·
- 90625pts119comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 625 points and 119 comments. The source actually reported 625 points and 119 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 625 points · 119 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 1 comments - 9177pts17comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 77 points and 17 comments. The source actually reported 92 points and 20 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 92 points · 20 comments → ·
- 92149pts39comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 149 points and 39 comments. The source actually reported 149 points and 39 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 149 points · 39 comments → ·
- 9314pts10comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 14 points and 10 comments. The source actually reported 52 points and 38 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 52 points · 38 comments → ·
Also discussed: Programming.dev · 16 comments Lobsters · 51 comments - 94937pts209comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 937 points and 209 comments. The source actually reported 937 points and 209 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 937 points · 209 comments → ·
- 9516pts12comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 16 points and 12 comments. The source actually reported 53 points and 40 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 53 points · 40 comments → ·
- 966pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 79 points and 46 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 79 points · 46 comments → ·
- 97209pts303comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 209 points and 303 comments. The source actually reported 209 points and 303 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 209 points · 303 comments → ·
- 985pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 64 points and 40 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 64 points · 40 comments → ·
- 99342pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 342 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 342 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 342 points · 3 comments → ·
- 10018pts21comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 18 points and 21 comments. The source actually reported 39 points and 45 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 39 points · 45 comments → ·
- 1016pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 57 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 57 points · 5 comments → ·
- 102361pts239comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 361 points and 239 comments. The source actually reported 361 points and 239 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 361 points · 239 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 8 comments - 1036pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 35 points and 18 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 35 points · 18 comments → ·
- 104130pts108comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 130 points and 108 comments. The source actually reported 130 points and 108 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 130 points · 108 comments → ·
- 105155pts151comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 155 points and 151 comments. The source actually reported 155 points and 151 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 155 points · 151 comments → ·
- 1067pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 39 points and 7 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 39 points · 7 comments → ·
- 1079pts8comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 8 comments. The source actually reported 29 points and 26 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 29 points · 26 comments → ·
- 108474pts76comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 474 points and 76 comments. The source actually reported 474 points and 76 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 474 points · 76 comments → ·
- 109240pts235comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 240 points and 235 comments. The source actually reported 240 points and 235 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 240 points · 235 comments → ·
- 11014pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 14 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 46 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 46 points · 2 comments → ·
- 1116pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 26 points and 16 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 26 points · 16 comments → ·
- 112280pts164comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 280 points and 164 comments. The source actually reported 280 points and 164 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 280 points · 164 comments → ·
- 113348pts84comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 348 points and 84 comments. The source actually reported 348 points and 84 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 348 points · 84 comments → ·
- 1148pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 37 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 37 points · 5 comments → ·
- 11545pts7comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 45 points and 7 comments. The source actually reported 63 points and 10 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 63 points · 10 comments → ·
- 11631pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 31 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 59 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 59 points · 3 comments → ·
- 11767pts65comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 67 points and 65 comments. The source actually reported 67 points and 65 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 67 points · 65 comments → ·
- 11848pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 48 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 65 points and 7 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 65 points · 7 comments → ·
- 1195pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 24 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 24 points · 0 comments → ·
- 12045pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 45 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 66 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 66 points · 3 comments → ·
- 121306pts144comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 306 points and 144 comments. The source actually reported 306 points and 144 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 306 points · 144 comments → ·
- 12267pts37comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 67 points and 37 comments. The source actually reported 67 points and 37 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 67 points · 37 comments → ·
- 12315pts6comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 15 points and 6 comments. The source actually reported 32 points and 13 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 32 points · 13 comments → ·
- 1247pts15comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 15 comments. The source actually reported 16 points and 33 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 16 points · 33 comments → ·
- 12569pts53comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 69 points and 53 comments. The source actually reported 69 points and 53 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 69 points · 53 comments → ·
- 1266pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 22 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 22 points · 3 comments → ·
- 1275pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 18 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 18 points · 1 comments → ·
- 12847pts64comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 47 points and 64 comments. The source actually reported 47 points and 64 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 47 points · 64 comments → ·
- 129234pts430comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 234 points and 430 comments. The source actually reported 234 points and 430 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 234 points · 430 comments → ·
- 13022pts7comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 22 points and 7 comments. The source actually reported 36 points and 12 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 36 points · 12 comments → ·
- 13115pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 15 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 32 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 32 points · 4 comments → ·
- 1329pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 24 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 24 points · 1 comments → ·
- 13372pts42comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 72 points and 42 comments. The source actually reported 72 points and 42 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 72 points · 42 comments → ·
- 134343pts149comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 343 points and 149 comments. The source actually reported 343 points and 149 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 343 points · 149 comments → ·
Also discussed: Programming.dev · 4 comments Lobsters · 53 comments - 135107pts37comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 107 points and 37 comments. The source actually reported 107 points and 37 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 107 points · 37 comments → ·
- 13633pts22comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 33 points and 22 comments. The source actually reported 37 points and 24 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 37 points · 24 comments → ·
- 1376pts8comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 8 comments. The source actually reported 12 points and 16 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 12 points · 16 comments → ·
- 138122pts46comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 122 points and 46 comments. The source actually reported 122 points and 46 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 122 points · 46 comments → ·
- 13941pts11comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 41 points and 11 comments. The source actually reported 45 points and 12 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 45 points · 12 comments → ·
- 14065pts32comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 65 points and 32 comments. The source actually reported 65 points and 32 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 65 points · 32 comments → ·
- 14155pts69comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 55 points and 69 comments. The source actually reported 55 points and 69 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 55 points · 69 comments → ·
- 14281pts23comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 81 points and 23 comments. The source actually reported 81 points and 23 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 81 points · 23 comments → ·
- 14336pts15comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 36 points and 15 comments. The source actually reported 39 points and 16 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 39 points · 16 comments → ·
- 14423pts8comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 23 points and 8 comments. The source actually reported 57 points and 20 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 57 points · 20 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 0 comments Hacker News · 0 comments - 14510pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 19 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 19 points · 5 comments → ·
- 14641pts17comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 41 points and 17 comments. The source actually reported 41 points and 17 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 41 points · 17 comments → ·
- 14724pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 24 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 67 points and 8 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 67 points · 8 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 0 comments Hacker News · 0 comments - 148119pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 119 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 119 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 119 points · 2 comments → ·
- 14966pts16comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 66 points and 16 comments. The source actually reported 66 points and 16 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 66 points · 16 comments → ·
- 15090pts26comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 90 points and 26 comments. The source actually reported 90 points and 26 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 90 points · 26 comments → ·
- 151119pts223comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 119 points and 223 comments. The source actually reported 119 points and 223 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 119 points · 223 comments → ·
- 1528pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 15 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 15 points · 1 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 12 comments - 15336pts71comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 36 points and 71 comments. The source actually reported 36 points and 71 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 36 points · 71 comments → ·
- 1547pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 14 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 14 points · 1 comments → ·
- 155227pts181comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 227 points and 181 comments. The source actually reported 227 points and 181 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 227 points · 181 comments → ·
- 15644pts7comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 44 points and 7 comments. The source actually reported 44 points and 7 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 44 points · 7 comments → ·
- 157241pts218comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 241 points and 218 comments. The source actually reported 241 points and 218 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 241 points · 218 comments → ·
- 158408pts68comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 408 points and 68 comments. The source actually reported 408 points and 68 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 408 points · 68 comments → ·
- 1599pts14comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 14 comments. The source actually reported 12 points and 19 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 12 points · 19 comments → ·
- 160115pts95comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 115 points and 95 comments. The source actually reported 115 points and 95 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 115 points · 95 comments → ·
- 16139pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 39 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 40 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 40 points · 5 comments → ·
- 16221pts15comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 21 points and 15 comments. The source actually reported 23 points and 17 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 23 points · 17 comments → ·
- 16354pts11comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 54 points and 11 comments. The source actually reported 54 points and 11 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 54 points · 11 comments → ·
- 16441pts25comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 41 points and 25 comments. The source actually reported 41 points and 25 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 41 points · 25 comments → ·
- 16510pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 16 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 16 points · 4 comments → ·
- 1666pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 10 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 10 points · 3 comments → ·
- 16774pts12comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 74 points and 12 comments. The source actually reported 74 points and 12 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 74 points · 12 comments → ·
- 168197pts91comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 197 points and 91 comments. The source actually reported 197 points and 91 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 197 points · 91 comments → ·
- 16912pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 12 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 17 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 17 points · 5 comments → ·
- 17062pts6comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 62 points and 6 comments. The source actually reported 62 points and 6 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 62 points · 6 comments → ·
- 17141pts35comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 41 points and 35 comments. The source actually reported 41 points and 35 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 41 points · 35 comments → ·
- 17236pts18comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 36 points and 18 comments. The source actually reported 36 points and 18 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 36 points · 18 comments → ·
- 1737pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 62 points and 12 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 62 points · 12 comments → ·
- 17479pts24comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 79 points and 24 comments. The source actually reported 79 points and 24 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 79 points · 24 comments → ·
- 175222pts142comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 222 points and 142 comments. The source actually reported 222 points and 142 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 222 points · 142 comments → ·
- 1768pts26comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 26 comments. The source actually reported 18 points and 57 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 18 points · 57 comments → ·
- 177239pts40comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 239 points and 40 comments. The source actually reported 239 points and 40 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 239 points · 40 comments → ·
- 17819pts15comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 19 points and 15 comments. The source actually reported 19 points and 15 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 19 points · 15 comments → ·
- 1796pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 9 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 9 points · 2 comments → ·
- 18059pts25comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 59 points and 25 comments. The source actually reported 59 points and 25 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 59 points · 25 comments → ·
- 181251pts113comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 251 points and 113 comments. The source actually reported 251 points and 113 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 251 points · 113 comments → ·
Also discussed: Programming.dev · 4 comments - 182102pts28comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 102 points and 28 comments. The source actually reported 102 points and 28 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 102 points · 28 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 73 comments - 18355pts25comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 55 points and 25 comments. The source actually reported 55 points and 25 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 55 points · 25 comments → ·
- 184156pts58comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 156 points and 58 comments. The source actually reported 156 points and 58 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 156 points · 58 comments → ·
- 18519pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 19 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 22 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 22 points · 1 comments → ·
- 18611pts6comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 11 points and 6 comments. The source actually reported 26 points and 15 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 26 points · 15 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 71 comments - 18721pts12comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 21 points and 12 comments. The source actually reported 21 points and 12 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 21 points · 12 comments → ·
- 1886pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 2 comments → ·
- 18932pts21comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 32 points and 21 comments. The source actually reported 32 points and 21 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 32 points · 21 comments → ·
- 19012pts11comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 12 points and 11 comments. The source actually reported 13 points and 12 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 13 points · 12 comments → ·
- 191175pts127comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 175 points and 127 comments. The source actually reported 175 points and 127 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 175 points · 127 comments → ·
- 1926pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 0 comments → ·
- 19318pts9comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 18 points and 9 comments. The source actually reported 18 points and 9 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 18 points · 9 comments → ·
- 19452pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 52 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 52 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 52 points · 3 comments → ·
- 195304pts57comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 304 points and 57 comments. The source actually reported 304 points and 57 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 304 points · 57 comments → ·
- 19628pts59comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 28 points and 59 comments. The source actually reported 28 points and 59 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 28 points · 59 comments → ·
- 197186pts51comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 186 points and 51 comments. The source actually reported 186 points and 51 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 186 points · 51 comments → ·
- 19812pts6comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 12 points and 6 comments. The source actually reported 24 points and 12 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 24 points · 12 comments → ·
- 19944pts24comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 44 points and 24 comments. The source actually reported 44 points and 24 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 44 points · 24 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 28 comments - 200168pts232comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 168 points and 232 comments. The source actually reported 168 points and 232 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 168 points · 232 comments → ·
- 2015pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 29 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 29 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2029pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 11 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 11 points · 1 comments → ·
- 20323pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 23 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 23 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 23 points · 4 comments → ·
- 20414pts8comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 14 points and 8 comments. The source actually reported 14 points and 8 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 14 points · 8 comments → ·
- 20513pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 13 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 14 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 14 points · 2 comments → ·
- 20610pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 11 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 11 points · 5 comments → ·
- 2076pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2087pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 1 comments → ·
- 20947pts48comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 47 points and 48 comments. The source actually reported 47 points and 48 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 47 points · 48 comments → ·
- 21016pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 16 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 17 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 17 points · 0 comments → ·
- 211110pts24comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 110 points and 24 comments. The source actually reported 110 points and 24 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 110 points · 24 comments → ·
- 2125pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 1 comments → ·
- 2138pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 9 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 9 points · 1 comments → ·
- 21443pts15comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 43 points and 15 comments. The source actually reported 43 points and 15 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 43 points · 15 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 17 comments - 21510pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 24 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 24 points · 2 comments → ·
- 216120pts114comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 120 points and 114 comments. The source actually reported 120 points and 114 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 120 points · 114 comments → ·
- 21711pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 11 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 12 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 12 points · 1 comments → ·
- 21812pts6comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 12 points and 6 comments. The source actually reported 12 points and 6 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 12 points · 6 comments → ·
- 2195pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 2 comments → ·
- 2205pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 3 comments → ·
- 2217pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 3 comments → ·
- 22223pts8comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 23 points and 8 comments. The source actually reported 23 points and 8 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 23 points · 8 comments → ·
- 2237pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 0 comments → ·
- 22433pts17comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 33 points and 17 comments. The source actually reported 33 points and 17 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 33 points · 17 comments → ·
- 2256pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 2 comments → ·
- 2266pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 1 comments → ·
- 2275pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 0 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 18 comments - 2285pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 1 comments → ·
- 2296pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 0 comments → ·
- 23017pts50comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 17 points and 50 comments. The source actually reported 17 points and 50 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 17 points · 50 comments → ·
- 2315pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 1 comments → ·
- 2328pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 1 comments → ·
- 23318pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 18 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 18 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 18 points · 2 comments → ·
- 2349pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 9 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 9 points · 1 comments → ·
- 2356pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 0 comments → ·
- 23636pts31comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 36 points and 31 comments. The source actually reported 36 points and 31 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 36 points · 31 comments → ·
- 23724pts10comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 24 points and 10 comments. The source actually reported 24 points and 10 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 24 points · 10 comments → ·
- 23813pts14comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 13 points and 14 comments. The source actually reported 13 points and 14 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 13 points · 14 comments → ·
- 2397pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 1 comments → ·
- 24017pts7comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 17 points and 7 comments. The source actually reported 17 points and 7 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 17 points · 7 comments → ·
- 2415pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2428pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 2 comments → ·
- 2436pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2445pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2455pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 2 comments → ·
- 24615pts6comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 15 points and 6 comments. The source actually reported 15 points and 6 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 15 points · 6 comments → ·
- 24759pts25comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 59 points and 25 comments. The source actually reported 59 points and 25 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 59 points · 25 comments → ·
- 24817pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 17 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 17 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 17 points · 2 comments → ·
- 24915pts14comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 15 points and 14 comments. The source actually reported 15 points and 14 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 15 points · 14 comments → ·
- 250174pts68comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 174 points and 68 comments. The source actually reported 174 points and 68 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 174 points · 68 comments → ·
- 2516pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 0 comments → ·
- 25221pts7comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 21 points and 7 comments. The source actually reported 21 points and 7 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 21 points · 7 comments → ·
- 2536pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 0 comments → ·
- 25445pts11comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 45 points and 11 comments. The source actually reported 45 points and 11 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 45 points · 11 comments → ·
- 25512pts11comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 12 points and 11 comments. The source actually reported 12 points and 11 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 12 points · 11 comments → ·
- 2568pts6comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 6 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 6 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 6 comments → ·
- 2576pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 0 comments → ·
- 25816pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 16 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 16 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 16 points · 2 comments → ·
- 2596pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2607pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 2 comments → ·
- 2615pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2626pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2635pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2648pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 17 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 17 points · 1 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 27 comments - 2655pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 1 comments → ·
- 2666pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 0 comments → ·
- 26711pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 11 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 11 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 11 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2687pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 0 comments → ·
- 269132pts98comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 132 points and 98 comments. The source actually reported 132 points and 98 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 132 points · 98 comments → ·
- 2705pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 13 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 13 points · 1 comments → ·
- 2715pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 1 comments → ·
- 2726pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 14 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 14 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2737pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 2 comments → ·
- 2745pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 0 comments → ·
- 275156pts16comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 156 points and 16 comments. The source actually reported 156 points and 16 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 156 points · 16 comments → ·
- 2765pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2775pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 1 comments → ·
- 2785pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 2 comments → ·
- 2799pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 9 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 9 points · 2 comments → ·
- 28018pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 18 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 18 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 18 points · 2 comments → ·
- 2815pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 0 comments → ·
- 28215pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 15 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 15 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 15 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2836pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 2 comments → ·
- 28410pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 10 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 10 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2856pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2865pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 1 comments → ·
- 2875pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 3 comments → ·
- 28824pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 24 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 24 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 24 points · 1 comments → ·
- 28912pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 12 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 12 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 12 points · 4 comments → ·
- 2907pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 0 comments → ·
- 29111pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 11 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 11 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 11 points · 4 comments → ·
- 29213pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 13 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 13 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 13 points · 1 comments → ·
- 293286pts77comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 286 points and 77 comments. The source actually reported 286 points and 77 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 286 points · 77 comments → ·
- 2945pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 0 comments → ·
- 29512pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 12 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 12 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 12 points · 1 comments → ·
- 29620pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 20 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 20 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 20 points · 2 comments → ·
- 29757pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 57 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 57 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 57 points · 5 comments → ·
- 2986pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 1 comments → ·
- 29964pts16comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 64 points and 16 comments. The source actually reported 64 points and 16 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 64 points · 16 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 0 comments - 30015pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 15 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 15 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 15 points · 2 comments → ·
- 3017pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 1 comments → ·
- 3026pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 4 comments → ·
- 30329pts12comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 29 points and 12 comments. The source actually reported 29 points and 12 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 29 points · 12 comments → ·
- 3045pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 1 comments → ·
- 3055pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 0 comments → ·
- 30616pts13comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 16 points and 13 comments. The source actually reported 16 points and 13 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 16 points · 13 comments → ·
- 30711pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 11 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 11 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 11 points · 5 comments → ·
- 3088pts7comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 7 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 7 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 7 comments → ·
- 309125pts151comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 125 points and 151 comments. The source actually reported 125 points and 151 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 125 points · 151 comments → ·
- 31023pts11comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 23 points and 11 comments. The source actually reported 23 points and 11 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 23 points · 11 comments → ·
- 3116pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 2 comments → ·
- 31224pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 24 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 24 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 24 points · 1 comments → ·
- 3137pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 0 comments → ·
- 31412pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 12 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 12 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 12 points · 0 comments → ·
- 31513pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 13 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 13 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 13 points · 1 comments → ·
- 3167pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 0 comments → ·
- 31741pts23comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 41 points and 23 comments. The source actually reported 41 points and 23 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 41 points · 23 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 3 comments - 3188pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 1 comments → ·
- 3198pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 0 comments → ·
- 32024pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 24 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 24 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 24 points · 1 comments → ·
- 32114pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 14 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 14 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 14 points · 0 comments → ·
- 3229pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 9 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 9 points · 1 comments → ·
- 32312pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 12 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 12 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 12 points · 2 comments → ·
- 3249pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 9 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 9 points · 0 comments → ·
- 3256pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 1 comments → ·
- 3265pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 0 comments → ·
- 32712pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 12 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 12 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 12 points · 1 comments → ·
- 3287pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 3 comments → ·
- 32916pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 16 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 16 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 16 points · 0 comments → ·
- 3309pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 9 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 9 points · 1 comments → ·
- 331119pts55comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 119 points and 55 comments. The source actually reported 119 points and 55 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 119 points · 55 comments → ·
- 33219pts7comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 19 points and 7 comments. The source actually reported 19 points and 7 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 19 points · 7 comments → ·
- 3335pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 0 comments → ·
- 3346pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 3 comments → ·
- 3357pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 4 comments → ·
- 3367pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 1 comments → ·
- 33724pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 24 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 24 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 24 points · 2 comments → ·
- 33816pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 16 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 16 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 16 points · 4 comments → ·
- 33910pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 10 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 10 points · 2 comments → ·
- 3408pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 0 comments → ·
- 3415pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 2 comments → ·
- 34213pts26comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 13 points and 26 comments. The source actually reported 13 points and 26 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 13 points · 26 comments → ·
- 3436pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 0 comments → ·
- 3448pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 0 comments → ·
- 34511pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 11 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 11 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 11 points · 0 comments → ·
- 34610pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 10 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 10 points · 0 comments → ·
- 34720pts55comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 20 points and 55 comments. The source actually reported 20 points and 55 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 20 points · 55 comments → ·
- 3485pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 0 comments → ·
- 3497pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 1 comments → ·
- 35014pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 14 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 14 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 14 points · 0 comments → ·
- 3516pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 1 comments → ·
- 3526pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 0 comments → ·
- 35310pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 10 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 10 points · 0 comments → ·
- 35450pts8comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 50 points and 8 comments. The source actually reported 50 points and 8 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 50 points · 8 comments → ·
- 35517pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 17 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 17 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 17 points · 5 comments → ·
- 35610pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 24 points and 13 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 24 points · 13 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 11 comments - 35712pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 12 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 12 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 12 points · 0 comments → ·
- 3585pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 15 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 15 points · 2 comments → ·
- 35944pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 44 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 44 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 44 points · 0 comments → ·
- 36018pts11comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 18 points and 11 comments. The source actually reported 20 points and 12 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 20 points · 12 comments → ·
- 36130pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 30 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 30 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 30 points · 5 comments → ·
- 36224pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 24 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 24 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 24 points · 1 comments → ·
- 36319pts8comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 19 points and 8 comments. The source actually reported 19 points and 8 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 19 points · 8 comments → ·
- 36418pts27comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 18 points and 27 comments. The source actually reported 18 points and 27 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 18 points · 27 comments → ·
- 36522pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 22 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 22 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 22 points · 1 comments → ·
- 36645pts37comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 45 points and 37 comments. The source actually reported 45 points and 37 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 45 points · 37 comments → ·
- 36743pts6comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 43 points and 6 comments. The source actually reported 43 points and 6 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 43 points · 6 comments → ·