Archived daily edition
Welcome. On your next visit, NEW badges highlight picks added since you last read.
- 011389pts726comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1389 points and 726 comments. The source actually reported 1389 points and 726 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1389 points · 726 comments → ·
- 021446pts287comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1446 points and 287 comments. The source actually reported 1446 points and 287 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1446 points · 287 comments → ·
- 03807pts339comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 807 points and 339 comments. The source actually reported 807 points and 339 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 807 points · 339 comments → ·
- 04344pts194comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 344 points and 194 comments. The source actually reported 526 points and 296 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 526 points · 296 comments → ·
- 05708pts363comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 708 points and 363 comments. The source actually reported 708 points and 363 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 708 points · 363 comments → ·
- 06283pts215comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 283 points and 215 comments. The source actually reported 408 points and 310 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 408 points · 310 comments → ·
- 07273pts97comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 273 points and 97 comments. The source actually reported 551 points and 196 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 551 points · 196 comments → ·
- 08408pts225comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 408 points and 225 comments. The source actually reported 413 points and 228 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 413 points · 228 comments → ·
- 0972pts11comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 72 points and 11 comments. The source actually reported 75 points and 12 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 75 points · 12 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 99 comments Hacker News · 1 comments - 10261pts662comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 261 points and 662 comments. The source actually reported 278 points and 706 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 278 points · 706 comments → ·
- 11151pts189comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 151 points and 189 comments. The source actually reported 644 points and 809 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 644 points · 809 comments → ·
- 12311pts68comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 311 points and 68 comments. The source actually reported 479 points and 105 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 479 points · 105 comments → ·
- 13177pts71comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 177 points and 71 comments. The source actually reported 458 points and 184 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 458 points · 184 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 16 comments - 14173pts69comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 173 points and 69 comments. The source actually reported 656 points and 260 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 656 points · 260 comments → ·
- 15111pts108comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 111 points and 108 comments. The source actually reported 563 points and 550 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 563 points · 550 comments → ·
- 16171pts91comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 171 points and 91 comments. The source actually reported 479 points and 255 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 479 points · 255 comments → ·
- 17177pts152comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 177 points and 152 comments. The source actually reported 415 points and 357 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 415 points · 357 comments → ·
- 1855pts15comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 55 points and 15 comments. The source actually reported 192 points and 51 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 192 points · 51 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 38 comments Programming.dev · 16 comments - 19197pts94comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 197 points and 94 comments. The source actually reported 429 points and 206 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 429 points · 206 comments → ·
- 20172pts67comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 172 points and 67 comments. The source actually reported 697 points and 271 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 697 points · 271 comments → ·
Edition progress · 20/20 selections generated
Top 10: every 2 h 24 min. Top 20: every 1 h 12 min. UTC. Recovered gaps are marked estimated; gaps without eligible coverage remain missed.
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated