Archived daily edition
Welcome. On your next visit, NEW badges highlight picks added since you last read.
- 01473pts594comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 473 points and 594 comments. The source actually reported 644 points and 809 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 644 points · 809 comments → ·
- 02436pts173comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 436 points and 173 comments. The source actually reported 656 points and 260 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 656 points · 260 comments → ·
- 03267pts134comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 267 points and 134 comments. The source actually reported 1142 points and 576 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1142 points · 576 comments → ·
- 04256pts378comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 256 points and 378 comments. The source actually reported 727 points and 1072 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 727 points · 1072 comments → ·
- 05122pts32comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 122 points and 32 comments. The source actually reported 192 points and 51 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 192 points · 51 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 38 comments Programming.dev · 16 comments - 06420pts411comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 420 points and 411 comments. The source actually reported 563 points and 550 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 563 points · 550 comments → ·
- 07416pts162comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 416 points and 162 comments. The source actually reported 697 points and 271 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 697 points · 271 comments → ·
- 08295pts209comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 295 points and 209 comments. The source actually reported 978 points and 693 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 978 points · 697 comments → ·
- 09383pts192comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 383 points and 192 comments. The source actually reported 751 points and 376 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 751 points · 379 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 23 comments - 1080pts19comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 80 points and 19 comments. The source actually reported 124 points and 29 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 124 points · 29 comments → ·
- 11491pts261comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 491 points and 261 comments. The source actually reported 615 points and 327 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 615 points · 327 comments → ·
- 12447pts184comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 447 points and 184 comments. The source actually reported 449 points and 185 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 449 points · 185 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 7 comments - 13180pts116comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 180 points and 116 comments. The source actually reported 793 points and 510 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 793 points · 510 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 12 comments - 14172pts189comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 172 points and 189 comments. The source actually reported 911 points and 1005 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 911 points · 1005 comments → ·
- 15367pts144comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 367 points and 144 comments. The source actually reported 453 points and 178 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 453 points · 178 comments → ·
- 16230pts76comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 230 points and 76 comments. The source actually reported 623 points and 205 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 623 points · 205 comments → ·
- 17144pts165comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 144 points and 165 comments. The source actually reported 418 points and 479 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 418 points · 479 comments → ·
- 18160pts73comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 160 points and 73 comments. The source actually reported 714 points and 326 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 714 points · 326 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 9 comments - 19185pts102comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 185 points and 102 comments. The source actually reported 674 points and 370 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 674 points · 370 comments → ·
- 20201pts114comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 201 points and 114 comments. The source actually reported 671 points and 381 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 671 points · 381 comments → ·
Edition progress · 20/20 selections generated
Top 10: every 2 h 24 min. Top 20: every 1 h 12 min. UTC. Recovered gaps are marked estimated; gaps without eligible coverage remain missed.
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated