Archived daily edition
Daily ranking · strictly above median
Welcome. On your next visit, NEW badges highlight picks added since you last read.
- 01882pts625comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 882 points and 625 comments. The source actually reported 978 points and 693 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 978 points · 693 comments → ·
- 021142pts576comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1142 points and 576 comments. The source actually reported 1142 points and 576 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1142 points · 576 comments → ·
- 03445pts491comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 445 points and 491 comments. The source actually reported 911 points and 1005 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 911 points · 1005 comments → ·
- 04727pts1072comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 727 points and 1072 comments. The source actually reported 727 points and 1072 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 727 points · 1072 comments → ·
- 05457pts294comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 457 points and 294 comments. The source actually reported 793 points and 510 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 793 points · 510 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 12 comments - 06751pts376comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 751 points and 376 comments. The source actually reported 751 points and 376 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 751 points · 376 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 23 comments - 07354pts117comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 354 points and 117 comments. The source actually reported 623 points and 205 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 623 points · 205 comments → ·
- 08697pts271comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 697 points and 271 comments. The source actually reported 697 points and 271 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 697 points · 271 comments → ·
- 09231pts106comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 231 points and 106 comments. The source actually reported 714 points and 326 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 714 points · 326 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 9 comments - 10219pts120comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 219 points and 120 comments. The source actually reported 674 points and 370 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 674 points · 370 comments → ·
- 11615pts327comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 615 points and 327 comments. The source actually reported 615 points and 327 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 615 points · 327 comments → ·
- 12201pts114comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 201 points and 114 comments. The source actually reported 671 points and 381 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 671 points · 381 comments → ·
- 13206pts236comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 206 points and 236 comments. The source actually reported 418 points and 479 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 418 points · 479 comments → ·
- 14206pts216comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 206 points and 216 comments. The source actually reported 392 points and 410 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 392 points · 410 comments → ·
- 15453pts178comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 453 points and 178 comments. The source actually reported 453 points and 178 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 453 points · 178 comments → ·
- 16563pts550comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 563 points and 550 comments. The source actually reported 563 points and 550 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 563 points · 550 comments → ·
- 17644pts809comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 644 points and 809 comments. The source actually reported 644 points and 809 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 644 points · 809 comments → ·
- 18140pts67comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 140 points and 67 comments. The source actually reported 609 points and 293 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 609 points · 293 comments → ·
- 19218pts281comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 218 points and 281 comments. The source actually reported 274 points and 353 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 274 points · 353 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 0 comments - 20656pts260comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 656 points and 260 comments. The source actually reported 656 points and 260 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 656 points · 260 comments → ·
- 21247pts71comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 247 points and 71 comments. The source actually reported 391 points and 112 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 391 points · 112 comments → ·
- 22200pts59comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 200 points and 59 comments. The source actually reported 425 points and 125 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 425 points · 125 comments → ·
- 23128pts141comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 128 points and 141 comments. The source actually reported 336 points and 372 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 336 points · 372 comments → ·
- 24225pts113comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 225 points and 113 comments. The source actually reported 314 points and 158 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 314 points · 158 comments → ·
- 25103pts145comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 103 points and 145 comments. The source actually reported 349 points and 489 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 349 points · 489 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 18 comments - 26146pts238comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 146 points and 238 comments. The source actually reported 226 points and 368 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 226 points · 368 comments → ·
- 27103pts88comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 103 points and 88 comments. The source actually reported 364 points and 313 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 364 points · 313 comments → ·
- 28192pts171comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 192 points and 171 comments. The source actually reported 243 points and 217 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 243 points · 217 comments → ·
- 2978pts59comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 78 points and 59 comments. The source actually reported 802 points and 607 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 802 points · 607 comments → ·
- 30449pts185comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 449 points and 185 comments. The source actually reported 449 points and 185 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 449 points · 185 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 7 comments - 31107pts113comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 107 points and 113 comments. The source actually reported 264 points and 279 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 264 points · 279 comments → ·
- 32287pts193comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 287 points and 193 comments. The source actually reported 287 points and 193 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 287 points · 193 comments → ·
- 33410pts220comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 410 points and 220 comments. The source actually reported 410 points and 220 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 410 points · 220 comments → ·
- 34479pts255comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 479 points and 255 comments. The source actually reported 479 points and 255 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 479 points · 255 comments → ·
- 35380pts65comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 380 points and 65 comments. The source actually reported 380 points and 65 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 380 points · 65 comments → ·
- 36192pts51comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 192 points and 51 comments. The source actually reported 192 points and 51 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 192 points · 51 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 38 comments Programming.dev · 16 comments - 37200pts80comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 200 points and 80 comments. The source actually reported 253 points and 101 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 253 points · 101 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 3 comments - 38415pts357comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 415 points and 357 comments. The source actually reported 415 points and 357 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 415 points · 357 comments → ·
- 39164pts84comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 164 points and 84 comments. The source actually reported 239 points and 122 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 239 points · 122 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 3 comments - 40429pts206comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 429 points and 206 comments. The source actually reported 429 points and 206 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 429 points · 206 comments → ·
- 4179pts48comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 79 points and 48 comments. The source actually reported 317 points and 193 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 317 points · 193 comments → ·
Also discussed: Programming.dev · 32 comments Lobsters · 39 comments - 42130pts135comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 130 points and 135 comments. The source actually reported 180 points and 187 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 180 points · 187 comments → ·
- 43317pts70comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 317 points and 70 comments. The source actually reported 317 points and 70 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 317 points · 70 comments → ·
- 44167pts29comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 167 points and 29 comments. The source actually reported 268 points and 47 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 268 points · 47 comments → ·
- 45222pts77comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 222 points and 77 comments. The source actually reported 230 points and 80 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 230 points · 80 comments → ·
- 4641pts63comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 41 points and 63 comments. The source actually reported 71 points and 110 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 71 points · 110 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 2 comments Hacker News · 0 comments - 47419pts144comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 419 points and 144 comments. The source actually reported 419 points and 144 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 419 points · 144 comments → ·
- 48124pts29comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 124 points and 29 comments. The source actually reported 124 points and 29 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 124 points · 29 comments → ·
- 49458pts184comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 458 points and 184 comments. The source actually reported 458 points and 184 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 458 points · 184 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 16 comments - 5080pts32comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 80 points and 32 comments. The source actually reported 220 points and 88 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 220 points · 88 comments → ·
- 51173pts110comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 173 points and 110 comments. The source actually reported 173 points and 110 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 173 points · 110 comments → ·
- 5297pts140comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 97 points and 140 comments. The source actually reported 134 points and 193 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 134 points · 193 comments → ·
- 5376pts69comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 76 points and 69 comments. The source actually reported 157 points and 143 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 157 points · 143 comments → ·
- 5452pts25comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 52 points and 25 comments. The source actually reported 286 points and 136 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 286 points · 136 comments → ·
- 55124pts35comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 124 points and 35 comments. The source actually reported 183 points and 52 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 183 points · 52 comments → ·
- 5656pts30comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 56 points and 30 comments. The source actually reported 196 points and 106 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 196 points · 106 comments → ·
- 5741pts40comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 41 points and 40 comments. The source actually reported 171 points and 170 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 171 points · 170 comments → ·
- 5849pts38comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 49 points and 38 comments. The source actually reported 162 points and 127 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 162 points · 127 comments → ·
- 59253pts183comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 253 points and 183 comments. The source actually reported 253 points and 183 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 253 points · 183 comments → ·
- 6051pts13comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 51 points and 13 comments. The source actually reported 272 points and 67 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 272 points · 67 comments → ·
- 6131pts20comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 31 points and 20 comments. The source actually reported 58 points and 36 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 58 points · 36 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 57 comments - 6231pts18comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 31 points and 18 comments. The source actually reported 308 points and 179 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 308 points · 179 comments → ·
- 6349pts10comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 49 points and 10 comments. The source actually reported 240 points and 51 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 240 points · 51 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 3 comments - 64269pts32comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 269 points and 32 comments. The source actually reported 269 points and 32 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 269 points · 32 comments → ·
- 65551pts196comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 551 points and 196 comments. The source actually reported 551 points and 196 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 551 points · 196 comments → ·
- 66138pts82comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 138 points and 82 comments. The source actually reported 138 points and 82 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 138 points · 82 comments → ·
- 6735pts22comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 35 points and 22 comments. The source actually reported 151 points and 94 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 151 points · 94 comments → ·
- 6893pts107comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 93 points and 107 comments. The source actually reported 101 points and 117 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 101 points · 117 comments → ·
- 6931pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 31 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 73 points and 10 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 73 points · 10 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 32 comments - 70105pts123comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 105 points and 123 comments. The source actually reported 105 points and 123 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 105 points · 123 comments → ·
- 71160pts167comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 160 points and 167 comments. The source actually reported 160 points and 167 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 160 points · 167 comments → ·
- 72127pts52comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 127 points and 52 comments. The source actually reported 127 points and 52 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 127 points · 52 comments → ·
- 73220pts127comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 220 points and 127 comments. The source actually reported 220 points and 127 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 220 points · 127 comments → ·
- 7422pts22comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 22 points and 22 comments. The source actually reported 117 points and 115 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 117 points · 115 comments → ·
- 7532pts8comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 32 points and 8 comments. The source actually reported 176 points and 43 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 176 points · 43 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 0 comments - 76479pts105comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 479 points and 105 comments. The source actually reported 479 points and 105 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 479 points · 105 comments → ·
- 7771pts12comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 71 points and 12 comments. The source actually reported 130 points and 22 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 130 points · 22 comments → ·
- 7830pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 30 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 254 points and 25 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 254 points · 25 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 25 comments - 79194pts149comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 194 points and 149 comments. The source actually reported 194 points and 149 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 194 points · 149 comments → ·
- 8034pts40comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 34 points and 40 comments. The source actually reported 72 points and 85 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 72 points · 85 comments → ·
- 81100pts81comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 100 points and 81 comments. The source actually reported 100 points and 81 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 100 points · 81 comments → ·
- 8217pts7comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 17 points and 7 comments. The source actually reported 220 points and 94 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 220 points · 94 comments → ·
- 8354pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 54 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 155 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 155 points · 2 comments → ·
- 8425pts13comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 25 points and 13 comments. The source actually reported 107 points and 56 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 107 points · 56 comments → ·
- 8530pts12comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 30 points and 12 comments. The source actually reported 108 points and 42 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 108 points · 42 comments → ·
- 86114pts30comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 114 points and 30 comments. The source actually reported 115 points and 30 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 115 points · 30 comments → ·
- 8718pts11comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 18 points and 11 comments. The source actually reported 37 points and 22 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 37 points · 22 comments → ·
- 88152pts47comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 152 points and 47 comments. The source actually reported 152 points and 47 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 152 points · 47 comments → ·
- 8931pts12comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 31 points and 12 comments. The source actually reported 99 points and 38 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 99 points · 38 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 1 comments - 9053pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 53 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 145 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 145 points · 3 comments → ·
- 9120pts11comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 20 points and 11 comments. The source actually reported 101 points and 56 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 101 points · 56 comments → ·
- 9215pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 15 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 213 points and 74 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 213 points · 74 comments → ·
- 9328pts7comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 28 points and 7 comments. The source actually reported 113 points and 27 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 113 points · 27 comments → ·
- 9465pts58comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 65 points and 58 comments. The source actually reported 78 points and 69 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 78 points · 69 comments → ·
- 95181pts100comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 181 points and 100 comments. The source actually reported 181 points and 100 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 181 points · 100 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 10 comments - 9614pts13comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 14 points and 13 comments. The source actually reported 85 points and 79 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 85 points · 79 comments → ·
- 97526pts296comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 526 points and 296 comments. The source actually reported 526 points and 296 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 526 points · 296 comments → ·
- 9815pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 15 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 152 points and 34 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 152 points · 34 comments → ·
- 9925pts31comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 25 points and 31 comments. The source actually reported 57 points and 69 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 57 points · 69 comments → ·
- 10010pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 46 points and 11 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 46 points · 11 comments → ·
- 10123pts14comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 23 points and 14 comments. The source actually reported 70 points and 42 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 70 points · 42 comments → ·
- 1025pts13comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 13 comments. The source actually reported 18 points and 46 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 18 points · 46 comments → ·
- 10310pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 82 points and 40 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 82 points · 40 comments → ·
- 104108pts19comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 108 points and 19 comments. The source actually reported 108 points and 19 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 108 points · 19 comments → ·
- 1055pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 146 points and 103 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 146 points · 103 comments → ·
- 10610pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 79 points and 40 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 79 points · 40 comments → ·
- 10713pts9comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 13 points and 9 comments. The source actually reported 60 points and 43 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 60 points · 43 comments → ·
- 108287pts130comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 287 points and 130 comments. The source actually reported 287 points and 130 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 287 points · 130 comments → ·
- 10933pts10comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 33 points and 10 comments. The source actually reported 70 points and 21 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 70 points · 21 comments → ·
- 110408pts310comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 408 points and 310 comments. The source actually reported 408 points and 310 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 408 points · 310 comments → ·
- 1116pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 22 points and 18 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 22 points · 18 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 0 comments - 11210pts11comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 11 comments. The source actually reported 40 points and 44 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 40 points · 44 comments → ·
- 1137pts6comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 6 comments. The source actually reported 19 points and 16 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 19 points · 16 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 2 comments - 114275pts189comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 275 points and 189 comments. The source actually reported 275 points and 189 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 275 points · 189 comments → ·
- 11524pts6comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 24 points and 6 comments. The source actually reported 61 points and 15 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 61 points · 15 comments → ·
- 1168pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 45 points and 21 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 45 points · 21 comments → ·
- 1178pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 30 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 30 points · 3 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 118 comments - 118133pts43comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 133 points and 43 comments. The source actually reported 133 points and 43 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 133 points · 43 comments → ·
- 1196pts6comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 6 comments. The source actually reported 32 points and 35 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 32 points · 35 comments → ·
- 12026pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 26 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 67 points and 9 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 67 points · 9 comments → ·
- 121807pts339comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 807 points and 339 comments. The source actually reported 807 points and 339 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 807 points · 339 comments → ·
- 12282pts52comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 82 points and 52 comments. The source actually reported 82 points and 52 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 82 points · 52 comments → ·
- 12386pts16comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 86 points and 16 comments. The source actually reported 86 points and 16 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 86 points · 16 comments → ·
- 124218pts153comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 218 points and 153 comments. The source actually reported 218 points and 153 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 218 points · 153 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 4 comments - 12564pts110comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 64 points and 110 comments. The source actually reported 64 points and 110 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 64 points · 110 comments → ·
- 1268pts17comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 17 comments. The source actually reported 22 points and 49 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 22 points · 49 comments → ·
- 1279pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 35 points and 17 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 35 points · 17 comments → ·
- 1287pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 36 points and 17 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 36 points · 17 comments → ·
- 1295pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 38 points and 8 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 38 points · 8 comments → ·
- 13059pts52comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 59 points and 52 comments. The source actually reported 59 points and 52 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 59 points · 52 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 5 comments - 13120pts11comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 20 points and 11 comments. The source actually reported 25 points and 14 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 25 points · 14 comments → ·
- 13213pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 13 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 42 points and 9 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 42 points · 9 comments → ·
- 1335pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 30 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 30 points · 5 comments → ·
- 134278pts706comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 278 points and 706 comments. The source actually reported 278 points and 706 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 278 points · 706 comments → ·
- 13531pts9comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 31 points and 9 comments. The source actually reported 52 points and 15 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 52 points · 15 comments → ·
- 1366pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 30 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 30 points · 5 comments → ·
- 13713pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 13 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 36 points and 14 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 36 points · 14 comments → ·
- 13839pts41comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 39 points and 41 comments. The source actually reported 44 points and 46 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 44 points · 46 comments → ·
- 13918pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 18 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 48 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 48 points · 3 comments → ·
- 14086pts38comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 86 points and 38 comments. The source actually reported 86 points and 38 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 86 points · 38 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 7 comments - 14196pts113comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 96 points and 113 comments. The source actually reported 96 points and 113 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 96 points · 113 comments → ·
- 1427pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 27 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 27 points · 5 comments → ·
- 14374pts91comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 74 points and 91 comments. The source actually reported 74 points and 91 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 74 points · 91 comments → ·
- 14414pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 14 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 40 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 40 points · 4 comments → ·
- 145413pts228comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 413 points and 228 comments. The source actually reported 413 points and 228 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 413 points · 228 comments → ·
- 14685pts18comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 85 points and 18 comments. The source actually reported 85 points and 18 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 85 points · 18 comments → ·
- 147161pts151comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 161 points and 151 comments. The source actually reported 161 points and 151 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 161 points · 151 comments → ·
- 14889pts32comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 89 points and 32 comments. The source actually reported 89 points and 32 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 89 points · 32 comments → ·
- 149279pts107comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 279 points and 107 comments. The source actually reported 279 points and 107 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 279 points · 107 comments → ·
- 15084pts31comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 84 points and 31 comments. The source actually reported 84 points and 31 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 84 points · 31 comments → ·
- 1517pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 22 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 22 points · 3 comments → ·
- 1526pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 18 points and 7 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 18 points · 7 comments → ·
- 1535pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 18 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 18 points · 1 comments → ·
- 15410pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 26 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 26 points · 4 comments → ·
- 15511pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 11 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 25 points and 10 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 25 points · 10 comments → ·
- 1568pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 23 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 23 points · 3 comments → ·
- 15724pts8comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 24 points and 8 comments. The source actually reported 24 points and 8 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 24 points · 8 comments → ·
- 15878pts89comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 78 points and 89 comments. The source actually reported 78 points and 89 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 78 points · 89 comments → ·
- 1595pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 16 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 16 points · 3 comments → ·
- 16021pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 21 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 37 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 37 points · 4 comments → ·
- 16113pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 13 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 26 points and 7 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 26 points · 7 comments → ·
- 1627pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 19 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 19 points · 0 comments → ·
- 16329pts20comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 29 points and 20 comments. The source actually reported 34 points and 24 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 34 points · 24 comments → ·
- 16474pts122comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 74 points and 122 comments. The source actually reported 74 points and 122 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 74 points · 122 comments → ·
- 16573pts26comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 73 points and 26 comments. The source actually reported 73 points and 26 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 73 points · 26 comments → ·
- 166614pts99comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 614 points and 99 comments. The source actually reported 614 points and 99 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 614 points · 99 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 12 comments - 167472pts329comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 472 points and 329 comments. The source actually reported 472 points and 329 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 472 points · 329 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 0 comments - 168152pts110comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 152 points and 110 comments. The source actually reported 152 points and 110 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 152 points · 110 comments → ·
- 16957pts20comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 57 points and 20 comments. The source actually reported 57 points and 20 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 57 points · 20 comments → ·
- 17054pts9comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 54 points and 9 comments. The source actually reported 54 points and 9 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 54 points · 9 comments → ·
- 171299pts247comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 299 points and 247 comments. The source actually reported 299 points and 247 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 299 points · 247 comments → ·
- 17276pts21comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 76 points and 21 comments. The source actually reported 76 points and 21 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 76 points · 21 comments → ·
- 173101pts36comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 101 points and 36 comments. The source actually reported 101 points and 36 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 101 points · 36 comments → ·
- 1747pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 11 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 11 points · 3 comments → ·
- 1755pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 11 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 11 points · 2 comments → ·
- 176329pts155comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 329 points and 155 comments. The source actually reported 329 points and 155 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 329 points · 155 comments → ·
- 1776pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 10 points and 9 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 10 points · 9 comments → ·
- 17887pts64comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 87 points and 64 comments. The source actually reported 87 points and 64 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 87 points · 64 comments → ·
- 1798pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 15 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 15 points · 0 comments → ·
- 18064pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 64 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 64 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 64 points · 3 comments → ·
- 181151pts44comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 151 points and 44 comments. The source actually reported 151 points and 44 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 151 points · 44 comments → ·
- 18248pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 48 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 48 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 48 points · 3 comments → ·
- 1838pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 14 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 14 points · 3 comments → ·
- 18414pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 14 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 15 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 15 points · 2 comments → ·
- 18542pts90comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 42 points and 90 comments. The source actually reported 42 points and 90 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 42 points · 90 comments → ·
- 1866pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 10 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 10 points · 1 comments → ·
- 18744pts6comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 44 points and 6 comments. The source actually reported 44 points and 6 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 44 points · 6 comments → ·
- 188221pts71comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 221 points and 71 comments. The source actually reported 221 points and 71 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 221 points · 71 comments → ·
- 18985pts65comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 85 points and 65 comments. The source actually reported 85 points and 65 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 85 points · 65 comments → ·
- 190101pts19comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 101 points and 19 comments. The source actually reported 101 points and 19 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 101 points · 19 comments → ·
- 19128pts23comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 28 points and 23 comments. The source actually reported 28 points and 23 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 28 points · 23 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 3 comments - 19258pts69comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 58 points and 69 comments. The source actually reported 58 points and 69 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 58 points · 69 comments → ·
- 193265pts55comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 265 points and 55 comments. The source actually reported 265 points and 55 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 265 points · 55 comments → ·
- 19444pts34comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 44 points and 34 comments. The source actually reported 44 points and 34 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 44 points · 34 comments → ·
- 195179pts116comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 179 points and 116 comments. The source actually reported 179 points and 116 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 179 points · 116 comments → ·
- 1965pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 9 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 9 points · 2 comments → ·
- 19711pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 11 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 15 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 15 points · 4 comments → ·
- 19856pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 56 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 56 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 56 points · 5 comments → ·
- 199225pts88comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 225 points and 88 comments. The source actually reported 225 points and 88 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 225 points · 88 comments → ·
- 20027pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 27 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 29 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 29 points · 4 comments → ·
- 20127pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 27 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 31 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 31 points · 0 comments → ·
- 20213pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 13 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 18 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 18 points · 1 comments → ·
- 20318pts26comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 18 points and 26 comments. The source actually reported 18 points and 26 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 18 points · 26 comments → ·
- 20441pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 41 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 41 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 41 points · 4 comments → ·
- 2055pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 2 comments → ·
- 20657pts71comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 57 points and 71 comments. The source actually reported 57 points and 71 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 57 points · 71 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 15 comments - 207217pts109comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 217 points and 109 comments. The source actually reported 217 points and 109 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 217 points · 109 comments → ·
- 20834pts18comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 34 points and 18 comments. The source actually reported 34 points and 18 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 34 points · 18 comments → ·
- 20952pts44comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 52 points and 44 comments. The source actually reported 52 points and 44 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 52 points · 44 comments → ·
- 21035pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 35 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 35 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 35 points · 3 comments → ·
- 21117pts12comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 17 points and 12 comments. The source actually reported 17 points and 12 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 17 points · 12 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 1 comments - 2125pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 5 comments → ·
- 21314pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 14 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 18 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 18 points · 0 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 8 comments - 21424pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 24 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 25 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 25 points · 3 comments → ·
- 21527pts31comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 27 points and 31 comments. The source actually reported 27 points and 31 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 27 points · 31 comments → ·
- 216199pts105comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 199 points and 105 comments. The source actually reported 199 points and 105 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 199 points · 105 comments → ·
- 21714pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 14 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 16 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 16 points · 4 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 20 comments - 21825pts8comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 25 points and 8 comments. The source actually reported 25 points and 8 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 25 points · 8 comments → ·
- 2195pts14comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 14 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 16 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 16 comments → ·
- 22090pts55comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 90 points and 55 comments. The source actually reported 90 points and 55 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 90 points · 55 comments → ·
- 22111pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 11 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 12 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 12 points · 5 comments → ·
- 2227pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 9 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 9 points · 1 comments → ·
- 2235pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 2 comments → ·
- 2249pts24comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 24 comments. The source actually reported 9 points and 24 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 9 points · 24 comments → ·
- 2259pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 11 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 11 points · 3 comments → ·
- 226296pts321comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 296 points and 321 comments. The source actually reported 296 points and 321 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 296 points · 321 comments → ·
- 22714pts8comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 14 points and 8 comments. The source actually reported 14 points and 8 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 14 points · 8 comments → ·
- 22814pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 14 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 16 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 16 points · 0 comments → ·
- 22934pts20comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 34 points and 20 comments. The source actually reported 34 points and 20 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 34 points · 20 comments → ·
- 23026pts63comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 26 points and 63 comments. The source actually reported 26 points and 63 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 26 points · 63 comments → ·
- 2316pts10comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 10 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 11 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 11 comments → ·
- 23212pts6comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 12 points and 6 comments. The source actually reported 12 points and 6 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 12 points · 6 comments → ·
- 2339pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 10 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 10 points · 1 comments → ·
- 23416pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 16 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 16 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 16 points · 3 comments → ·
- 23516pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 16 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 16 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 16 points · 0 comments → ·
- 236135pts14comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 135 points and 14 comments. The source actually reported 135 points and 14 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 135 points · 14 comments → ·
- 23711pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 11 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 12 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 12 points · 1 comments → ·
- 2385pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 0 comments → ·
- 23969pts147comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 69 points and 147 comments. The source actually reported 69 points and 147 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 69 points · 147 comments → ·
- 24033pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 33 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 33 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 33 points · 3 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 35 comments - 24110pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 10 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 10 points · 1 comments → ·
- 2429pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 10 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 10 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2439pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 10 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 10 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2448pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 4 comments → ·
- 24519pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 19 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 19 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 19 points · 1 comments → ·
- 2467pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2475pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 1 comments → ·
- 24817pts6comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 17 points and 6 comments. The source actually reported 17 points and 6 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 17 points · 6 comments → ·
- 2495pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 1 comments → ·
- 25057pts153comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 57 points and 153 comments. The source actually reported 57 points and 153 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 57 points · 153 comments → ·
- 2518pts13comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 13 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 13 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 13 comments → ·
- 25211pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 11 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 11 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 11 points · 3 comments → ·
- 2536pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2547pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 0 comments → ·
- 255212pts189comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 212 points and 189 comments. The source actually reported 212 points and 189 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 212 points · 189 comments → ·
- 2566pts8comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 8 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 8 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 8 comments → ·
- 2575pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 2 comments → ·
- 2585pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2599pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 9 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 9 points · 1 comments → ·
- 2605pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 1 comments → ·
- 26115pts10comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 15 points and 10 comments. The source actually reported 15 points and 10 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 15 points · 10 comments → ·
- 2628pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 1 comments → ·
- 2639pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 9 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 9 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2648pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 1 comments → ·
- 2658pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2665pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 0 comments → ·
- 26713pts8comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 13 points and 8 comments. The source actually reported 13 points and 8 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 13 points · 8 comments → ·
- 2685pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 3 comments → ·
- 2698pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 2 comments → ·
- 2708pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 0 comments → ·
- 27119pts8comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 19 points and 8 comments. The source actually reported 19 points and 8 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 19 points · 8 comments → ·
- 27216pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 16 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 16 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 16 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2736pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2747pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2756pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 1 comments → ·
- 2766pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 0 comments → ·
- 27714pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 14 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 14 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 14 points · 3 comments → ·
- 2786pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 0 comments → ·
- 27933pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 33 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 33 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 33 points · 1 comments → ·
- 28016pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 16 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 16 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 16 points · 0 comments → ·
- 281105pts80comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 105 points and 80 comments. The source actually reported 105 points and 80 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 105 points · 80 comments → ·
- 2827pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 3 comments → ·
- 28342pts80comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 42 points and 80 comments. The source actually reported 42 points and 80 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 42 points · 80 comments → ·
- 2846pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 10 points and 7 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 10 points · 7 comments → ·
- 285102pts19comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 102 points and 19 comments. The source actually reported 102 points and 19 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 102 points · 19 comments → ·