Archived daily edition
Welcome. On your next visit, NEW badges highlight picks added since you last read.
- 011016pts605comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1016 points and 605 comments. The source actually reported 2042 points and 1216 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 2042 points · 1216 comments → ·
- 02233pts264comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 233 points and 264 comments. The source actually reported 1362 points and 1539 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1362 points · 1539 comments → ·
- 0372pts76comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 72 points and 76 comments. The source actually reported 89 points and 94 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 89 points · 94 comments → ·
- 04423pts402comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 423 points and 402 comments. The source actually reported 596 points and 566 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 596 points · 566 comments → ·
- 05491pts177comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 491 points and 177 comments. The source actually reported 584 points and 211 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 584 points · 211 comments → ·
- 06300pts179comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 300 points and 179 comments. The source actually reported 586 points and 349 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 586 points · 349 comments → ·
- 07332pts276comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 332 points and 276 comments. The source actually reported 505 points and 420 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 505 points · 420 comments → ·
- 08309pts69comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 309 points and 69 comments. The source actually reported 937 points and 209 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 937 points · 209 comments → ·
- 09208pts323comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 208 points and 323 comments. The source actually reported 433 points and 673 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 433 points · 673 comments → ·
- 10380pts281comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 380 points and 281 comments. The source actually reported 392 points and 290 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 392 points · 290 comments → ·
- 11302pts353comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 302 points and 353 comments. The source actually reported 348 points and 407 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 348 points · 407 comments → ·
- 12233pts203comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 233 points and 203 comments. The source actually reported 375 points and 326 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 375 points · 326 comments → ·
- 13305pts181comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 305 points and 181 comments. The source actually reported 393 points and 233 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 393 points · 233 comments → ·
- 14230pts433comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 230 points and 433 comments. The source actually reported 273 points and 513 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 273 points · 513 comments → ·
- 15158pts112comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 158 points and 112 comments. The source actually reported 575 points and 408 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 575 points · 408 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 14 comments - 1637pts13comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 37 points and 13 comments. The source actually reported 147 points and 53 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 147 points · 53 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 149 comments Programming.dev · 4 comments - 17138pts83comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 138 points and 83 comments. The source actually reported 960 points and 575 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 960 points · 575 comments → ·
- 18156pts73comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 156 points and 73 comments. The source actually reported 1049 points and 488 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1049 points · 488 comments → ·
- 19193pts143comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 193 points and 143 comments. The source actually reported 607 points and 449 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 607 points · 449 comments → ·
- 20241pts29comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 241 points and 29 comments. The source actually reported 2123 points and 259 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 2123 points · 259 comments → ·
Edition progress · 20/20 selections generated
Top 10: every 2 h 24 min. Top 20: every 1 h 12 min. UTC. Recovered gaps are marked estimated; gaps without eligible coverage remain missed.
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated