Archived daily edition
Welcome. On your next visit, NEW badges highlight picks added since you last read.
- 01557pts397comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 557 points and 397 comments. The source actually reported 1462 points and 1042 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1464 points · 1042 comments → ·
- 02392pts445comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 392 points and 445 comments. The source actually reported 890 points and 1010 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 891 points · 1010 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 35 comments - 03461pts556comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 461 points and 556 comments. The source actually reported 759 points and 917 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 760 points · 917 comments → ·
- 04570pts338comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 570 points and 338 comments. The source actually reported 746 points and 442 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 746 points · 442 comments → ·
Also discussed: Programming.dev · 9 comments - 0562pts50comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 62 points and 50 comments. The source actually reported 96 points and 78 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 96 points · 78 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 159 comments - 06622pts262comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 622 points and 262 comments. The source actually reported 778 points and 328 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 778 points · 330 comments → ·
- 07327pts272comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 327 points and 272 comments. The source actually reported 653 points and 543 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 653 points · 543 comments → ·
- 08848pts251comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 848 points and 251 comments. The source actually reported 848 points and 251 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 859 points · 254 comments → ·
- 09339pts615comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 339 points and 615 comments. The source actually reported 415 points and 754 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 415 points · 754 comments → ·
- 10400pts113comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 400 points and 113 comments. The source actually reported 571 points and 161 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 571 points · 161 comments → ·
- 11345pts654comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 345 points and 654 comments. The source actually reported 347 points and 658 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 347 points · 658 comments → ·
- 12194pts156comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 194 points and 156 comments. The source actually reported 943 points and 759 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 944 points · 759 comments → ·
- 13222pts93comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 222 points and 93 comments. The source actually reported 746 points and 313 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 746 points · 314 comments → ·
- 14465pts218comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 465 points and 218 comments. The source actually reported 465 points and 218 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 465 points · 218 comments → ·
- 15248pts123comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 248 points and 123 comments. The source actually reported 509 points and 252 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 509 points · 252 comments → ·
- 16230pts255comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 230 points and 255 comments. The source actually reported 419 points and 465 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 419 points · 470 comments → ·
- 1751pts14comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 51 points and 14 comments. The source actually reported 131 points and 35 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 131 points · 35 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 3 comments - 18176pts214comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 176 points and 214 comments. The source actually reported 666 points and 809 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 668 points · 812 comments → ·
- 19271pts67comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 271 points and 67 comments. The source actually reported 1940 points and 476 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1950 points · 479 comments → ·
- 20246pts161comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 246 points and 161 comments. The source actually reported 947 points and 619 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 948 points · 620 comments → ·
Edition progress · 20/20 selections generated
Top 10: every 2 h 24 min. Top 20: every 1 h 12 min. UTC. Recovered gaps are marked estimated; gaps without eligible coverage remain missed.
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated
- estimated