Archived daily edition
Daily ranking · strictly above median
Welcome. On your next visit, NEW badges highlight picks added since you last read.
- 011462pts1042comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1462 points and 1042 comments. The source actually reported 1462 points and 1042 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1462 points · 1042 comments → ·
- 02571pts459comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 571 points and 459 comments. The source actually reported 943 points and 759 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 943 points · 759 comments → ·
- 03368pts90comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 368 points and 90 comments. The source actually reported 1940 points and 476 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1940 points · 476 comments → ·
- 04890pts1010comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 890 points and 1010 comments. The source actually reported 890 points and 1010 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 890 points · 1010 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 35 comments - 05483pts203comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 483 points and 203 comments. The source actually reported 746 points and 313 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 746 points · 313 comments → ·
- 06653pts543comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 653 points and 543 comments. The source actually reported 653 points and 543 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 653 points · 543 comments → ·
- 07242pts295comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 242 points and 295 comments. The source actually reported 666 points and 809 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 666 points · 809 comments → ·
- 08246pts161comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 246 points and 161 comments. The source actually reported 947 points and 619 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 947 points · 619 comments → ·
- 09759pts917comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 759 points and 917 comments. The source actually reported 759 points and 917 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 759 points · 917 comments → ·
- 10375pts186comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 375 points and 186 comments. The source actually reported 509 points and 252 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 509 points · 252 comments → ·
- 11314pts348comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 314 points and 348 comments. The source actually reported 419 points and 465 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 419 points · 465 comments → ·
- 12190pts187comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 190 points and 187 comments. The source actually reported 581 points and 571 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 581 points · 571 comments → ·
- 13778pts328comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 778 points and 328 comments. The source actually reported 778 points and 328 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 778 points · 328 comments → ·
- 14746pts442comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 746 points and 442 comments. The source actually reported 746 points and 442 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 746 points · 442 comments → ·
Also discussed: Programming.dev · 9 comments - 15571pts161comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 571 points and 161 comments. The source actually reported 571 points and 161 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 571 points · 161 comments → ·
- 16168pts116comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 168 points and 116 comments. The source actually reported 531 points and 365 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 531 points · 365 comments → ·
- 17116pts164comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 116 points and 164 comments. The source actually reported 562 points and 800 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 562 points · 800 comments → ·
- 18415pts754comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 415 points and 754 comments. The source actually reported 415 points and 754 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 415 points · 754 comments → ·
- 19117pts51comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 117 points and 51 comments. The source actually reported 883 points and 386 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 883 points · 386 comments → ·
- 20162pts47comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 162 points and 47 comments. The source actually reported 517 points and 150 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 517 points · 150 comments → ·
- 21465pts218comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 465 points and 218 comments. The source actually reported 465 points and 218 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 465 points · 218 comments → ·
- 22317pts162comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 317 points and 162 comments. The source actually reported 317 points and 162 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 317 points · 162 comments → ·
- 2370pts19comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 70 points and 19 comments. The source actually reported 131 points and 35 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 131 points · 35 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 3 comments - 24262pts263comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 262 points and 263 comments. The source actually reported 262 points and 263 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 262 points · 263 comments → ·
- 25848pts251comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 848 points and 251 comments. The source actually reported 848 points and 251 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 848 points · 251 comments → ·
- 26347pts658comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 347 points and 658 comments. The source actually reported 347 points and 658 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 347 points · 658 comments → ·
- 27229pts87comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 229 points and 87 comments. The source actually reported 285 points and 108 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 285 points · 108 comments → ·
- 28802pts607comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 802 points and 607 comments. The source actually reported 802 points and 607 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 802 points · 607 comments → ·
- 2986pts66comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 86 points and 66 comments. The source actually reported 385 points and 296 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 385 points · 296 comments → ·
- 30243pts196comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 243 points and 196 comments. The source actually reported 243 points and 196 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 243 points · 196 comments → ·
- 3187pts63comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 87 points and 63 comments. The source actually reported 383 points and 277 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 383 points · 277 comments → ·
- 32293pts551comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 293 points and 551 comments. The source actually reported 293 points and 551 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 293 points · 551 comments → ·
- 33462pts264comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 462 points and 264 comments. The source actually reported 462 points and 264 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 462 points · 264 comments → ·
- 34351pts186comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 351 points and 186 comments. The source actually reported 351 points and 186 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 351 points · 186 comments → ·
- 35107pts65comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 107 points and 65 comments. The source actually reported 241 points and 147 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 241 points · 147 comments → ·
- 36369pts187comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 369 points and 187 comments. The source actually reported 369 points and 187 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 369 points · 187 comments → ·
- 37109pts112comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 109 points and 112 comments. The source actually reported 177 points and 182 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 177 points · 182 comments → ·
- 3830pts17comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 30 points and 17 comments. The source actually reported 86 points and 49 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 86 points · 49 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 427 comments - 39911pts1005comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 911 points and 1005 comments. The source actually reported 911 points and 1005 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 911 points · 1005 comments → ·
- 40433pts97comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 433 points and 97 comments. The source actually reported 433 points and 97 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 433 points · 97 comments → ·
- 4162pts23comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 62 points and 23 comments. The source actually reported 425 points and 161 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 425 points · 161 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 52 comments - 42253pts103comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 253 points and 103 comments. The source actually reported 253 points and 103 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 253 points · 103 comments → ·
- 4394pts15comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 94 points and 15 comments. The source actually reported 302 points and 47 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 302 points · 47 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 8 comments - 4458pts66comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 58 points and 66 comments. The source actually reported 179 points and 206 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 179 points · 206 comments → ·
- 4567pts67comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 67 points and 67 comments. The source actually reported 173 points and 173 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 173 points · 173 comments → ·
- 4653pts16comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 53 points and 16 comments. The source actually reported 693 points and 205 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 693 points · 205 comments → ·
- 4796pts78comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 96 points and 78 comments. The source actually reported 96 points and 78 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 96 points · 78 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 159 comments - 48115pts45comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 115 points and 45 comments. The source actually reported 187 points and 73 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 187 points · 73 comments → ·
- 49106pts26comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 106 points and 26 comments. The source actually reported 209 points and 52 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 209 points · 52 comments → ·
- 5045pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 45 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 86 points and 6 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 86 points · 6 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 0 comments Hacker News · 0 comments - 5164pts75comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 64 points and 75 comments. The source actually reported 146 points and 171 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 146 points · 171 comments → ·
- 5243pts21comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 43 points and 21 comments. The source actually reported 59 points and 28 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 59 points · 28 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 30 comments - 53335pts294comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 335 points and 294 comments. The source actually reported 335 points and 294 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 335 points · 294 comments → ·
- 5477pts95comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 77 points and 95 comments. The source actually reported 129 points and 159 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 129 points · 159 comments → ·
- 5588pts50comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 88 points and 50 comments. The source actually reported 156 points and 88 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 156 points · 88 comments → ·
- 5651pts44comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 51 points and 44 comments. The source actually reported 164 points and 143 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 164 points · 143 comments → ·
- 5762pts80comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 62 points and 80 comments. The source actually reported 125 points and 161 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 125 points · 161 comments → ·
- 5849pts31comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 49 points and 31 comments. The source actually reported 191 points and 119 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 191 points · 119 comments → ·
- 59671pts381comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 671 points and 381 comments. The source actually reported 671 points and 381 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 671 points · 381 comments → ·
- 60714pts326comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 714 points and 326 comments. The source actually reported 714 points and 326 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 714 points · 326 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 9 comments - 61215pts120comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 215 points and 120 comments. The source actually reported 215 points and 120 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 215 points · 120 comments → ·
- 6261pts28comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 61 points and 28 comments. The source actually reported 172 points and 80 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 172 points · 80 comments → ·
- 63674pts370comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 674 points and 370 comments. The source actually reported 674 points and 370 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 674 points · 370 comments → ·
- 6442pts17comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 42 points and 17 comments. The source actually reported 286 points and 118 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 286 points · 118 comments → ·
- 6539pts14comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 39 points and 14 comments. The source actually reported 330 points and 122 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 330 points · 122 comments → ·
- 66609pts293comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 609 points and 293 comments. The source actually reported 609 points and 293 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 609 points · 293 comments → ·
- 6742pts65comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 42 points and 65 comments. The source actually reported 109 points and 170 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 109 points · 170 comments → ·
Also discussed: Programming.dev · 11 comments - 6844pts35comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 44 points and 35 comments. The source actually reported 146 points and 117 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 146 points · 117 comments → ·
- 6995pts23comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 95 points and 23 comments. The source actually reported 157 points and 38 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 157 points · 38 comments → ·
- 7041pts36comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 41 points and 36 comments. The source actually reported 137 points and 121 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 137 points · 121 comments → ·
- 71232pts59comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 232 points and 59 comments. The source actually reported 232 points and 59 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 232 points · 59 comments → ·
- 7252pts10comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 52 points and 10 comments. The source actually reported 221 points and 41 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 221 points · 41 comments → ·
- 73793pts510comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 793 points and 510 comments. The source actually reported 793 points and 510 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 793 points · 510 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 12 comments - 74161pts61comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 161 points and 61 comments. The source actually reported 161 points and 61 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 161 points · 61 comments → ·
- 75101pts77comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 101 points and 77 comments. The source actually reported 118 points and 90 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 118 points · 90 comments → ·
- 76384pts100comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 384 points and 100 comments. The source actually reported 384 points and 100 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 384 points · 100 comments → ·
- 7772pts28comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 72 points and 28 comments. The source actually reported 132 points and 51 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 132 points · 51 comments → ·
- 7837pts18comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 37 points and 18 comments. The source actually reported 169 points and 83 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 169 points · 83 comments → ·
- 7936pts32comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 36 points and 32 comments. The source actually reported 122 points and 110 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 122 points · 110 comments → ·
- 80247pts100comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 247 points and 100 comments. The source actually reported 247 points and 100 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 247 points · 100 comments → ·
- 81191pts156comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 191 points and 156 comments. The source actually reported 191 points and 156 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 191 points · 156 comments → ·
- 82112pts72comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 112 points and 72 comments. The source actually reported 118 points and 76 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 118 points · 76 comments → ·
- 8352pts124comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 52 points and 124 comments. The source actually reported 75 points and 181 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 75 points · 181 comments → ·
- 84167pts132comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 167 points and 132 comments. The source actually reported 167 points and 132 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 167 points · 132 comments → ·
- 8533pts28comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 33 points and 28 comments. The source actually reported 114 points and 97 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 114 points · 97 comments → ·
- 86121pts71comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 121 points and 71 comments. The source actually reported 121 points and 71 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 121 points · 71 comments → ·
- 87978pts693comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 978 points and 693 comments. The source actually reported 978 points and 693 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 978 points · 693 comments → ·
- 8892pts16comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 92 points and 16 comments. The source actually reported 92 points and 16 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 92 points · 16 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 1 comments - 8936pts39comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 36 points and 39 comments. The source actually reported 90 points and 96 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 90 points · 96 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 51 comments - 9075pts84comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 75 points and 84 comments. The source actually reported 86 points and 97 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 86 points · 97 comments → ·
- 9121pts26comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 21 points and 26 comments. The source actually reported 91 points and 112 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 91 points · 112 comments → ·
- 92102pts80comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 102 points and 80 comments. The source actually reported 102 points and 80 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 102 points · 80 comments → ·
- 93111pts85comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 111 points and 85 comments. The source actually reported 111 points and 85 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 111 points · 85 comments → ·
- 9425pts21comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 25 points and 21 comments. The source actually reported 30 points and 25 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 30 points · 25 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 72 comments - 9572pts46comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 72 points and 46 comments. The source actually reported 92 points and 59 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 92 points · 59 comments → ·
- 9615pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 15 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 36 points and 8 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 36 points · 8 comments → ·
- 9721pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 21 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 39 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 39 points · 3 comments → ·
- 9823pts36comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 23 points and 36 comments. The source actually reported 66 points and 103 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 66 points · 103 comments → ·
- 9956pts69comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 56 points and 69 comments. The source actually reported 74 points and 91 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 74 points · 91 comments → ·
- 1005pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 29 points and 10 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 29 points · 10 comments → ·
- 101174pts89comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 174 points and 89 comments. The source actually reported 174 points and 89 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 174 points · 89 comments → ·
- 10239pts21comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 39 points and 21 comments. The source actually reported 87 points and 48 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 87 points · 48 comments → ·
- 10312pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 12 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 35 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 35 points · 4 comments → ·
- 10435pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 35 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 148 points and 14 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 148 points · 14 comments → ·
- 10552pts24comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 52 points and 24 comments. The source actually reported 90 points and 41 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 90 points · 41 comments → ·
- 10636pts12comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 36 points and 12 comments. The source actually reported 94 points and 32 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 94 points · 32 comments → ·
- 10738pts41comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 38 points and 41 comments. The source actually reported 67 points and 73 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 67 points · 73 comments → ·
- 10839pts24comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 39 points and 24 comments. The source actually reported 79 points and 49 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 79 points · 49 comments → ·
- 10928pts31comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 28 points and 31 comments. The source actually reported 64 points and 72 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 64 points · 72 comments → ·
- 11040pts16comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 40 points and 16 comments. The source actually reported 87 points and 34 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 87 points · 34 comments → ·
- 11120pts15comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 20 points and 15 comments. The source actually reported 77 points and 58 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 77 points · 58 comments → ·
- 11245pts37comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 45 points and 37 comments. The source actually reported 71 points and 59 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 71 points · 59 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 1 comments - 11371pts12comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 71 points and 12 comments. The source actually reported 103 points and 18 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 103 points · 18 comments → ·
- 11425pts39comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 25 points and 39 comments. The source actually reported 52 points and 83 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 52 points · 83 comments → ·
- 115194pts164comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 194 points and 164 comments. The source actually reported 194 points and 164 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 194 points · 164 comments → ·
- 116129pts86comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 129 points and 86 comments. The source actually reported 129 points and 86 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 129 points · 86 comments → ·
- 11724pts15comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 24 points and 15 comments. The source actually reported 71 points and 45 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 71 points · 45 comments → ·
- 118349pts489comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 349 points and 489 comments. The source actually reported 349 points and 489 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 349 points · 489 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 18 comments - 119280pts144comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 280 points and 144 comments. The source actually reported 280 points and 144 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 280 points · 144 comments → ·
- 12032pts38comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 32 points and 38 comments. The source actually reported 56 points and 66 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 56 points · 66 comments → ·
- 12114pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 14 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 27 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 27 points · 3 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 51 comments - 122623pts205comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 623 points and 205 comments. The source actually reported 623 points and 205 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 623 points · 205 comments → ·
- 123185pts50comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 185 points and 50 comments. The source actually reported 185 points and 50 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 185 points · 50 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 0 comments - 124134pts118comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 134 points and 118 comments. The source actually reported 134 points and 118 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 134 points · 118 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 3 comments - 125246pts170comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 246 points and 170 comments. The source actually reported 246 points and 170 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 246 points · 170 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 0 comments - 12613pts16comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 13 points and 16 comments. The source actually reported 49 points and 60 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 49 points · 60 comments → ·
- 127364pts313comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 364 points and 313 comments. The source actually reported 364 points and 313 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 364 points · 313 comments → ·
- 12847pts70comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 47 points and 70 comments. The source actually reported 56 points and 83 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 56 points · 83 comments → ·
- 12926pts48comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 26 points and 48 comments. The source actually reported 45 points and 81 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 45 points · 81 comments → ·
- 1307pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 21 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 21 points · 0 comments → ·
- 13197pts38comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 97 points and 38 comments. The source actually reported 97 points and 38 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 97 points · 38 comments → ·
- 13239pts9comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 39 points and 9 comments. The source actually reported 39 points and 9 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 39 points · 9 comments → ·
- 133174pts90comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 174 points and 90 comments. The source actually reported 174 points and 90 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 174 points · 90 comments → ·
- 134139pts26comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 139 points and 26 comments. The source actually reported 139 points and 26 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 139 points · 26 comments → ·
- 13514pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 14 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 25 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 25 points · 1 comments → ·
- 136418pts479comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 418 points and 479 comments. The source actually reported 418 points and 479 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 418 points · 479 comments → ·
- 13716pts19comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 16 points and 19 comments. The source actually reported 43 points and 51 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 43 points · 51 comments → ·
- 13843pts10comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 43 points and 10 comments. The source actually reported 76 points and 17 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 76 points · 17 comments → ·
- 13958pts70comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 58 points and 70 comments. The source actually reported 60 points and 73 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 60 points · 73 comments → ·
- 14024pts42comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 24 points and 42 comments. The source actually reported 41 points and 73 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 41 points · 73 comments → ·
- 14123pts11comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 23 points and 11 comments. The source actually reported 59 points and 29 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 59 points · 29 comments → ·
- 142308pts179comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 308 points and 179 comments. The source actually reported 308 points and 179 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 308 points · 179 comments → ·
- 143125pts228comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 125 points and 228 comments. The source actually reported 125 points and 228 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 125 points · 228 comments → ·
- 1445pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 74 points and 15 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 74 points · 15 comments → ·
- 1458pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 63 points and 17 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 63 points · 17 comments → ·
- 14658pts52comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 58 points and 52 comments. The source actually reported 61 points and 54 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 61 points · 54 comments → ·
- 14723pts18comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 23 points and 18 comments. The source actually reported 48 points and 36 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 48 points · 36 comments → ·
- 14865pts13comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 65 points and 13 comments. The source actually reported 65 points and 13 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 65 points · 13 comments → ·
- 14998pts221comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 98 points and 221 comments. The source actually reported 98 points and 221 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 98 points · 221 comments → ·
- 15011pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 11 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 18 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 18 points · 5 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 0 comments - 15133pts14comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 33 points and 14 comments. The source actually reported 58 points and 24 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 58 points · 24 comments → ·
- 15215pts7comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 15 points and 7 comments. The source actually reported 20 points and 9 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 20 points · 9 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 2 comments - 15326pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 26 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 71 points and 6 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 71 points · 6 comments → ·
- 15490pts45comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 90 points and 45 comments. The source actually reported 90 points and 45 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 90 points · 45 comments → ·
- 155106pts18comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 106 points and 18 comments. The source actually reported 106 points and 18 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 106 points · 18 comments → ·
- 156336pts372comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 336 points and 372 comments. The source actually reported 336 points and 372 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 336 points · 372 comments → ·
- 15783pts25comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 83 points and 25 comments. The source actually reported 83 points and 25 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 83 points · 25 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 25 comments - 15885pts83comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 85 points and 83 comments. The source actually reported 85 points and 83 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 85 points · 83 comments → ·
- 1597pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 38 points and 14 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 38 points · 14 comments → ·
- 16044pts70comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 44 points and 70 comments. The source actually reported 44 points and 70 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 44 points · 70 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 140 comments Hacker News · 1 comments - 16188pts49comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 88 points and 49 comments. The source actually reported 88 points and 49 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 88 points · 49 comments → ·
- 162392pts410comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 392 points and 410 comments. The source actually reported 392 points and 410 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 392 points · 410 comments → ·
- 16326pts6comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 26 points and 6 comments. The source actually reported 56 points and 12 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 56 points · 12 comments → ·
- 16418pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 18 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 47 points and 13 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 47 points · 13 comments → ·
- 165130pts74comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 130 points and 74 comments. The source actually reported 130 points and 74 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 130 points · 74 comments → ·
- 166127pts122comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 127 points and 122 comments. The source actually reported 127 points and 122 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 127 points · 122 comments → ·
- 167317pts193comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 317 points and 193 comments. The source actually reported 317 points and 193 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 317 points · 193 comments → ·
Also discussed: Programming.dev · 32 comments Lobsters · 39 comments - 16834pts41comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 34 points and 41 comments. The source actually reported 43 points and 51 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 43 points · 51 comments → ·
- 16911pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 11 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 35 points and 17 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 35 points · 17 comments → ·
- 170177pts195comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 177 points and 195 comments. The source actually reported 177 points and 195 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 177 points · 195 comments → ·
- 17124pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 24 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 54 points and 7 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 54 points · 7 comments → ·
- 172117pts8comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 117 points and 8 comments. The source actually reported 117 points and 8 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 117 points · 8 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 39 comments Hacker News · 0 comments - 17310pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 41 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 41 points · 4 comments → ·
- 174131pts28comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 131 points and 28 comments. The source actually reported 131 points and 28 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 131 points · 28 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 7 comments - 1758pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 29 points and 13 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 29 points · 13 comments → ·
- 1765pts7comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 7 comments. The source actually reported 18 points and 23 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 18 points · 23 comments → ·
- 17711pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 11 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 30 points and 15 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 30 points · 15 comments → ·
- 178286pts136comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 286 points and 136 comments. The source actually reported 286 points and 136 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 286 points · 136 comments → ·
- 17916pts7comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 16 points and 7 comments. The source actually reported 35 points and 16 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 35 points · 16 comments → ·
- 18018pts13comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 18 points and 13 comments. The source actually reported 33 points and 24 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 33 points · 24 comments → ·
- 18114pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 14 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 37 points and 7 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 37 points · 7 comments → ·
- 1826pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 26 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 26 points · 1 comments → ·
- 183425pts125comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 425 points and 125 comments. The source actually reported 425 points and 125 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 425 points · 125 comments → ·
- 1845pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 24 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 24 points · 1 comments → ·
- 18510pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 30 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 30 points · 5 comments → ·
- 1869pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 14 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 14 points · 0 comments → ·
- 1879pts6comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 6 comments. The source actually reported 24 points and 15 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 24 points · 15 comments → ·
- 1887pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 22 points and 7 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 22 points · 7 comments → ·
- 18913pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 13 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 31 points and 8 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 31 points · 8 comments → ·
- 19029pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 29 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 48 points and 7 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 48 points · 7 comments → ·
- 19116pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 16 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 40 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 40 points · 2 comments → ·
- 19269pts6comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 69 points and 6 comments. The source actually reported 72 points and 6 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 72 points · 6 comments → ·
- 193161pts163comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 161 points and 163 comments. The source actually reported 161 points and 163 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 161 points · 163 comments → ·
- 1947pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 23 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 23 points · 3 comments → ·
- 19514pts16comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 14 points and 16 comments. The source actually reported 24 points and 28 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 24 points · 28 comments → ·
- 1965pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 16 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 16 points · 4 comments → ·
- 19714pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 14 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 37 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 37 points · 1 comments → ·
- 198145pts24comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 145 points and 24 comments. The source actually reported 145 points and 24 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 145 points · 24 comments → ·
- 19915pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 15 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 32 points and 6 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 32 points · 6 comments → ·
- 20011pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 11 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 29 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 29 points · 2 comments → ·
- 20148pts20comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 48 points and 20 comments. The source actually reported 50 points and 21 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 50 points · 21 comments → ·
- 2025pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 17 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 17 points · 4 comments → ·
- 203113pts67comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 113 points and 67 comments. The source actually reported 113 points and 67 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 113 points · 67 comments → ·
- 2045pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 17 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 17 points · 3 comments → ·
- 20577pts18comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 77 points and 18 comments. The source actually reported 77 points and 18 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 77 points · 18 comments → ·
- 206126pts126comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 126 points and 126 comments. The source actually reported 126 points and 126 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 126 points · 126 comments → ·
- 2077pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 19 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 19 points · 3 comments → ·
- 20814pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 14 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 15 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 15 points · 5 comments → ·
- 2095pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 14 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 14 points · 5 comments → ·
- 2106pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 16 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 16 points · 3 comments → ·
- 2118pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 20 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 20 points · 2 comments → ·
- 21213pts7comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 13 points and 7 comments. The source actually reported 23 points and 13 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 23 points · 13 comments → ·
- 213264pts279comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 264 points and 279 comments. The source actually reported 264 points and 279 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 264 points · 279 comments → ·
- 214220pts94comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 220 points and 94 comments. The source actually reported 220 points and 94 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 220 points · 94 comments → ·
- 21519pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 19 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 33 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 33 points · 3 comments → ·
- 216115pts127comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 115 points and 127 comments. The source actually reported 115 points and 127 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 115 points · 127 comments → ·
- 21725pts10comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 25 points and 10 comments. The source actually reported 33 points and 13 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 33 points · 13 comments → ·
- 21834pts20comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 34 points and 20 comments. The source actually reported 34 points and 20 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 34 points · 20 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 4 comments - 21934pts24comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 34 points and 24 comments. The source actually reported 36 points and 25 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 36 points · 25 comments → ·
- 220174pts131comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 174 points and 131 comments. The source actually reported 174 points and 131 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 174 points · 131 comments → ·
- 221272pts67comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 272 points and 67 comments. The source actually reported 272 points and 67 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 272 points · 67 comments → ·
- 22216pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 16 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 29 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 29 points · 5 comments → ·
- 22345pts17comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 45 points and 17 comments. The source actually reported 45 points and 17 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 45 points · 17 comments → ·
- 22412pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 12 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 24 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 24 points · 2 comments → ·
- 2255pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 14 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 14 points · 0 comments → ·
- 2266pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 16 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 16 points · 0 comments → ·
- 227213pts74comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 213 points and 74 comments. The source actually reported 213 points and 74 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 213 points · 74 comments → ·
- 22815pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 15 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 15 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 15 points · 5 comments → ·
- 2295pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 11 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 11 points · 2 comments → ·
- 23085pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 85 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 85 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 85 points · 2 comments → ·
- 23160pts10comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 60 points and 10 comments. The source actually reported 60 points and 10 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 60 points · 10 comments → ·
- 232203pts49comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 203 points and 49 comments. The source actually reported 203 points and 49 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 203 points · 49 comments → ·
- 23318pts15comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 18 points and 15 comments. The source actually reported 23 points and 19 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 23 points · 19 comments → ·
- 23467pts71comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 67 points and 71 comments. The source actually reported 67 points and 71 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 67 points · 71 comments → ·
- 235391pts112comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 391 points and 112 comments. The source actually reported 391 points and 112 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 391 points · 112 comments → ·
- 2365pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 10 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 10 points · 1 comments → ·
- 2375pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 11 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 11 points · 2 comments → ·
- 23847pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 47 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 49 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 49 points · 1 comments → ·
- 23912pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 12 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 20 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 20 points · 0 comments → ·
- 24048pts44comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 48 points and 44 comments. The source actually reported 48 points and 44 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 48 points · 44 comments → ·
- 2415pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 10 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 10 points · 0 comments → ·
- 24256pts34comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 56 points and 34 comments. The source actually reported 56 points and 34 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 56 points · 34 comments → ·
- 24336pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 36 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 40 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 40 points · 2 comments → ·
- 24432pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 32 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 36 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 36 points · 5 comments → ·
- 24512pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 12 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 18 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 18 points · 4 comments → ·
- 24653pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 53 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 53 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 53 points · 4 comments → ·
- 247146pts103comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 146 points and 103 comments. The source actually reported 146 points and 103 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 146 points · 103 comments → ·
- 24888pts54comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 88 points and 54 comments. The source actually reported 88 points and 54 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 88 points · 54 comments → ·
- 24938pts74comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 38 points and 74 comments. The source actually reported 38 points and 74 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 38 points · 74 comments → ·
- 250171pts170comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 171 points and 170 comments. The source actually reported 171 points and 170 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 171 points · 170 comments → ·
- 25128pts10comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 28 points and 10 comments. The source actually reported 29 points and 10 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 29 points · 10 comments → ·
- 25291pts19comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 91 points and 19 comments. The source actually reported 91 points and 19 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 91 points · 19 comments → ·
- 25343pts14comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 43 points and 14 comments. The source actually reported 43 points and 14 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 43 points · 14 comments → ·
- 25425pts8comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 25 points and 8 comments. The source actually reported 26 points and 8 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 26 points · 8 comments → ·
- 255196pts106comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 196 points and 106 comments. The source actually reported 196 points and 106 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 196 points · 106 comments → ·
- 25649pts26comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 49 points and 26 comments. The source actually reported 49 points and 26 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 49 points · 26 comments → ·
- 25737pts11comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 37 points and 11 comments. The source actually reported 37 points and 11 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 37 points · 11 comments → ·
- 2585pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 2 comments → ·
- 2596pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 9 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 9 points · 4 comments → ·
- 260226pts368comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 226 points and 368 comments. The source actually reported 226 points and 368 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 226 points · 368 comments → ·
- 2617pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 10 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 10 points · 1 comments → ·
- 262220pts88comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 220 points and 88 comments. The source actually reported 220 points and 88 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 220 points · 88 comments → ·
- 263141pts51comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 141 points and 51 comments. The source actually reported 141 points and 51 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 141 points · 51 comments → ·
- 26479pts69comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 79 points and 69 comments. The source actually reported 79 points and 69 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 79 points · 69 comments → ·
- 26511pts7comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 11 points and 7 comments. The source actually reported 13 points and 9 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 13 points · 9 comments → ·
- 26656pts23comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 56 points and 23 comments. The source actually reported 56 points and 23 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 56 points · 23 comments → ·
- 267107pts76comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 107 points and 76 comments. The source actually reported 107 points and 76 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 107 points · 76 comments → ·
- 268314pts158comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 314 points and 158 comments. The source actually reported 314 points and 158 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 314 points · 158 comments → ·
- 26911pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 11 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 14 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 14 points · 2 comments → ·
- 27020pts10comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 20 points and 10 comments. The source actually reported 20 points and 10 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 20 points · 10 comments → ·
- 271274pts353comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 274 points and 353 comments. The source actually reported 274 points and 353 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 274 points · 353 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 0 comments - 27253pts6comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 53 points and 6 comments. The source actually reported 53 points and 6 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 53 points · 6 comments → ·
- 2737pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 2 comments → ·
- 27411pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 11 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 13 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 13 points · 3 comments → ·
- 27539pts11comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 39 points and 11 comments. The source actually reported 39 points and 11 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 39 points · 11 comments → ·
- 276162pts127comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 162 points and 127 comments. The source actually reported 162 points and 127 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 162 points · 127 comments → ·
- 2775pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 4 comments → ·
- 2789pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 11 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 11 points · 1 comments → ·
- 27971pts110comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 71 points and 110 comments. The source actually reported 71 points and 110 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 71 points · 110 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 2 comments Hacker News · 0 comments - 28014pts6comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 14 points and 6 comments. The source actually reported 15 points and 6 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 15 points · 6 comments → ·
- 2819pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 11 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 11 points · 1 comments → ·
- 282109pts50comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 109 points and 50 comments. The source actually reported 109 points and 50 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 109 points · 50 comments → ·
- 283176pts43comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 176 points and 43 comments. The source actually reported 176 points and 43 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 176 points · 43 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 0 comments - 28410pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 10 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 10 points · 0 comments → ·
- 285151pts94comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 151 points and 94 comments. The source actually reported 151 points and 94 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 151 points · 94 comments → ·
- 28617pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 17 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 18 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 18 points · 2 comments → ·
- 28763pts9comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 63 points and 9 comments. The source actually reported 63 points and 9 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 63 points · 9 comments → ·
- 28819pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 19 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 20 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 20 points · 2 comments → ·
- 28935pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 35 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 35 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 35 points · 3 comments → ·
- 29018pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 18 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 18 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 18 points · 3 comments → ·
- 291110pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 110 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 110 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 110 points · 2 comments → ·
- 29221pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 21 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 21 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 21 points · 3 comments → ·
- 293152pts34comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 152 points and 34 comments. The source actually reported 152 points and 34 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 152 points · 34 comments → ·
- 29415pts13comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 15 points and 13 comments. The source actually reported 15 points and 13 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 15 points · 13 comments → ·
- 29542pts41comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 42 points and 41 comments. The source actually reported 42 points and 41 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 42 points · 41 comments → ·
- 29636pts20comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 36 points and 20 comments. The source actually reported 36 points and 20 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 36 points · 20 comments → ·
- 29738pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 38 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 38 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 38 points · 1 comments → ·
- 29819pts14comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 19 points and 14 comments. The source actually reported 19 points and 14 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 19 points · 14 comments → ·
- 29913pts6comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 13 points and 6 comments. The source actually reported 13 points and 6 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 13 points · 6 comments → ·
- 300118pts45comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 118 points and 45 comments. The source actually reported 118 points and 45 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 118 points · 45 comments → ·
- 30164pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 64 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 64 points and 5 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 64 points · 5 comments → ·
- 30214pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 14 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 15 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 15 points · 2 comments → ·
- 30311pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 11 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 12 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 12 points · 3 comments → ·
- 30425pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 25 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 25 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 25 points · 4 comments → ·
- 30511pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 11 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 12 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 12 points · 2 comments → ·
- 306117pts115comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 117 points and 115 comments. The source actually reported 117 points and 115 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 117 points · 115 comments → ·
- 30740pts57comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 40 points and 57 comments. The source actually reported 40 points and 57 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 40 points · 57 comments → ·
- 30816pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 16 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 16 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 16 points · 2 comments → ·
- 3096pts7comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 7 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 8 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 8 comments → ·
- 3109pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 9 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 9 points · 0 comments → ·
- 31130pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 30 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 30 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 30 points · 3 comments → ·
- 31238pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 38 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 38 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 38 points · 0 comments → ·
- 31332pts8comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 32 points and 8 comments. The source actually reported 32 points and 8 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 32 points · 8 comments → ·
- 3149pts6comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 6 comments. The source actually reported 9 points and 6 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 9 points · 6 comments → ·
- 31531pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 31 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 31 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 31 points · 2 comments → ·
- 316243pts217comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 243 points and 217 comments. The source actually reported 243 points and 217 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 243 points · 217 comments → ·
- 3177pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 1 comments → ·
- 31818pts11comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 18 points and 11 comments. The source actually reported 18 points and 11 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 18 points · 11 comments → ·
- 3196pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 0 comments → ·
- 32096pts26comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 96 points and 26 comments. The source actually reported 96 points and 26 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 96 points · 26 comments → ·
- 32110pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 11 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 11 points · 0 comments → ·
- 322239pts122comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 239 points and 122 comments. The source actually reported 239 points and 122 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 239 points · 122 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 3 comments - 3239pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 10 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 10 points · 0 comments → ·
- 3247pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 0 comments → ·
- 32520pts8comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 20 points and 8 comments. The source actually reported 20 points and 8 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 20 points · 8 comments → ·
- 3265pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 2 comments → ·
- 3278pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 9 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 9 points · 0 comments → ·
- 3286pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 3 comments → ·
- 32912pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 12 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 12 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 12 points · 3 comments → ·
- 33020pts9comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 20 points and 9 comments. The source actually reported 20 points and 9 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 20 points · 9 comments → ·
- 331268pts47comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 268 points and 47 comments. The source actually reported 268 points and 47 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 268 points · 47 comments → ·
- 3327pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 0 comments → ·
- 333157pts143comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 157 points and 143 comments. The source actually reported 157 points and 143 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 157 points · 143 comments → ·
- 3347pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 2 comments → ·
- 3356pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 0 comments → ·
- 3368pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 0 comments → ·
- 33710pts6comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 6 comments. The source actually reported 10 points and 6 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 10 points · 6 comments → ·
- 3388pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 0 comments → ·
- 3397pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 0 comments → ·
- 3406pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 0 comments → ·
- 3416pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 0 comments → ·
- 3425pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 0 comments → ·
- 34311pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 11 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 11 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 11 points · 1 comments → ·
- 3449pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 9 points and 4 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 9 points · 4 comments → ·
- 3456pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 0 comments → ·
- 3465pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 0 comments → ·
- 3477pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 0 comments → ·
- 3488pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 8 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 8 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 8 points · 0 comments → ·
- 34910pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 10 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 10 points · 1 comments → ·
- 35011pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 11 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 11 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 11 points · 0 comments → ·
- 35122pts20comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 22 points and 20 comments. The source actually reported 22 points and 20 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 22 points · 20 comments → ·
- 35225pts11comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 25 points and 11 comments. The source actually reported 25 points and 11 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 25 points · 11 comments → ·
- 3535pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 0 comments → ·
- 354253pts101comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 253 points and 101 comments. The source actually reported 253 points and 101 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 253 points · 101 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 3 comments - 3555pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 0 comments → ·
- 35613pts6comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 13 points and 6 comments. The source actually reported 13 points and 6 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 13 points · 6 comments → ·
- 3575pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 0 comments → ·
- 3586pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 0 comments → ·
- 3595pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 0 comments → ·
- 36015pts9comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 15 points and 9 comments. The source actually reported 15 points and 9 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 15 points · 9 comments → ·
- 36123pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 23 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 23 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 23 points · 2 comments → ·
- 3626pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 3 comments → ·
- 3636pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 1 comments → ·
- 3649pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 9 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 9 points · 2 comments → ·
- 36514pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 14 points and 3 comments. The source actually reported 14 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 14 points · 3 comments → ·
- 3666pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 0 comments → ·
- 3677pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 1 comments → ·
- 3685pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 1 comments → ·
- 3695pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 0 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 18 comments - 3706pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 0 comments → ·
- 37113pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 13 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 13 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 13 points · 1 comments → ·
- 372180pts187comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 180 points and 187 comments. The source actually reported 180 points and 187 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 180 points · 187 comments → ·
- 37349pts95comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 49 points and 95 comments. The source actually reported 49 points and 95 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 49 points · 95 comments → ·
- 3746pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 6 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 6 points · 0 comments → ·
- 37584pts41comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 84 points and 41 comments. The source actually reported 84 points and 41 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 84 points · 41 comments → ·
- 3767pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 0 comments → ·
- 3775pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 0 comments → ·
- 3785pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 5 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 5 points · 0 comments → ·
- 3797pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 0 comments → ·
- 38016pts9comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 16 points and 9 comments. The source actually reported 16 points and 9 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 16 points · 9 comments → ·
- 38185pts79comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 85 points and 79 comments. The source actually reported 85 points and 79 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 85 points · 79 comments → ·
- 382101pts56comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 101 points and 56 comments. The source actually reported 101 points and 56 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 101 points · 56 comments → ·
- 383222pts113comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 222 points and 113 comments. The source actually reported 222 points and 113 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 222 points · 113 comments → ·
- 384107pts56comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 107 points and 56 comments. The source actually reported 107 points and 56 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 107 points · 56 comments → ·