Programming.dev
Daily ranking · strictly above median
See this community's live ranking →
Welcome. On your next visit, NEW badges highlight picks added since you last read.
- 0175pts3comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Counts used at this checkpoint: 75 points and 3 comments.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 75 points · 3 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 1 comments - 0218pts2commentsLearned Index Lab: Replacing B-Trees with streaming linear models in pure Rust (-99% RAM, 3x faster)
Picked · selection snapshot
Counts used at this checkpoint: 18 points and 2 comments.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 18 points · 2 comments → ·
- 0312pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Counts used at this checkpoint: 12 points and 1 comments.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 12 points · 1 comments → ·
- 045pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 11 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 11 points · 1 comments → ·
- 0515pts1comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 15 points and 1 comments. The source actually reported 15 points and 1 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 15 points · 1 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 139 comments Lobsters · 10 comments - 0621pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 21 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 21 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 21 points · 0 comments → ·
- 0734pts11comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 34 points and 11 comments. The source actually reported 34 points and 11 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 34 points · 11 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 170 comments - 0810pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 21 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 21 points · 0 comments → ·
- 0934pts11comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 34 points and 11 comments. The source actually reported 34 points and 11 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 34 points · 11 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 170 comments - 1010pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 10 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 11 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 11 points · 0 comments → ·
- 1161pts8comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 61 points and 8 comments. The source actually reported 65 points and 9 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 65 points · 9 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 442 comments - 1212pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 12 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 34 points and 11 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 34 points · 11 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 170 comments - 1343pts32comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 43 points and 32 comments. The source actually reported 43 points and 32 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 43 points · 32 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 193 comments Lobsters · 39 comments - 1443pts32comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 43 points and 32 comments. The source actually reported 43 points and 32 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 43 points · 32 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 193 comments Lobsters · 39 comments - 159pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 14 points and 3 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 14 points · 3 comments → ·
- 1612pts9comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 12 points and 9 comments. The source actually reported 43 points and 32 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 43 points · 32 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 193 comments Lobsters · 39 comments - 1755pts16comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 55 points and 16 comments. The source actually reported 55 points and 16 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 55 points · 16 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 38 comments Lobsters · 51 comments - 186pts4comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 4 comments. The source actually reported 10 points and 7 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 10 points · 7 comments → ·
- 19102pts19comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 102 points and 19 comments. The source actually reported 102 points and 19 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 102 points · 19 comments → ·
- 205pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 55 points and 16 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 55 points · 16 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 38 comments Lobsters · 51 comments