Search
Searching all collected daily editions.
50 MATCHES · MORE AVAILABLE
Welcome. On your next visit, NEW badges highlight picks added since you last read.
- 151415pts420comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 415 points and 420 comments. The source actually reported 522 points and 528 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 522 points · 528 comments → ·
- 152333pts171comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 333 points and 171 comments. The source actually reported 708 points and 363 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 708 points · 363 comments → ·
- 153944pts1615comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 944 points and 1615 comments. The source actually reported 944 points and 1615 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 944 points · 1615 comments → ·
- 154491pts237comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 491 points and 237 comments. The source actually reported 702 points and 339 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 702 points · 339 comments → ·
- 155852pts233comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 852 points and 233 comments. The source actually reported 1052 points and 288 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1052 points · 288 comments → ·
- 156708pts140comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 708 points and 140 comments. The source actually reported 1446 points and 287 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1446 points · 287 comments → ·
- 15754pts30comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 54 points and 30 comments. The source actually reported 85 points and 48 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 85 points · 48 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 267 comments - 158702pts367comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 702 points and 367 comments. The source actually reported 1389 points and 726 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1389 points · 726 comments → ·
- 159213pts134comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 213 points and 134 comments. The source actually reported 366 points and 230 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 366 points · 230 comments → ·
- 160205pts95comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 205 points and 95 comments. The source actually reported 420 points and 195 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 420 points · 195 comments → ·
- 161154pts156comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 154 points and 156 comments. The source actually reported 522 points and 528 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 522 points · 528 comments → ·
- 162209pts108comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 209 points and 108 comments. The source actually reported 493 points and 254 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 493 points · 254 comments → ·
- 163202pts40comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 202 points and 40 comments. The source actually reported 1446 points and 287 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1446 points · 287 comments → ·
- 164140pts68comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 140 points and 68 comments. The source actually reported 702 points and 339 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 702 points · 339 comments → ·
- 165199pts167comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 199 points and 167 comments. The source actually reported 349 points and 293 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 349 points · 293 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 0 comments - 166147pts77comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 147 points and 77 comments. The source actually reported 1389 points and 726 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1389 points · 726 comments → ·
- 167221pts60comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 221 points and 60 comments. The source actually reported 1052 points and 288 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1052 points · 288 comments → ·
- 168280pts186comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 280 points and 186 comments. The source actually reported 408 points and 271 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 408 points · 271 comments → ·
- 169346pts241comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 346 points and 241 comments. The source actually reported 432 points and 301 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 432 points · 301 comments → ·
- 170403pts147comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 403 points and 147 comments. The source actually reported 571 points and 208 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 571 points · 208 comments → ·
- 1711049pts488comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1049 points and 488 comments. The source actually reported 1049 points and 488 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1049 points · 488 comments → ·
- 172614pts655comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 614 points and 655 comments. The source actually reported 614 points and 655 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 614 points · 655 comments → ·
- 173536pts169comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 536 points and 169 comments. The source actually reported 778 points and 245 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 778 points · 245 comments → ·
- 174521pts100comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 521 points and 100 comments. The source actually reported 962 points and 185 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 962 points · 185 comments → ·
- 175628pts245comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 628 points and 245 comments. The source actually reported 793 points and 309 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 793 points · 309 comments → ·
- 176486pts831comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 486 points and 831 comments. The source actually reported 944 points and 1615 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 944 points · 1615 comments → ·
- 1771137pts989comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1137 points and 989 comments. The source actually reported 1137 points and 989 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1137 points · 989 comments → ·
- 1782123pts259comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 2123 points and 259 comments. The source actually reported 2123 points and 259 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 2123 points · 259 comments → ·
- 179209pts99comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 209 points and 99 comments. The source actually reported 418 points and 199 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 418 points · 199 comments → ·
- 180233pts45comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 233 points and 45 comments. The source actually reported 962 points and 185 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 962 points · 185 comments → ·
- 181225pts71comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 225 points and 71 comments. The source actually reported 778 points and 245 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 778 points · 245 comments → ·
- 182211pts339comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 211 points and 339 comments. The source actually reported 381 points and 612 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 381 points · 612 comments → ·
- 183155pts266comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 155 points and 266 comments. The source actually reported 944 points and 1615 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 944 points · 1615 comments → ·
- 184365pts375comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 365 points and 375 comments. The source actually reported 378 points and 388 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 378 points · 388 comments → ·
- 185231pts90comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 231 points and 90 comments. The source actually reported 793 points and 309 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 793 points · 309 comments → ·
- 186100pts95comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 100 points and 95 comments. The source actually reported 120 points and 114 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 120 points · 114 comments → ·
- 187321pts334comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 321 points and 334 comments. The source actually reported 409 points and 426 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 409 points · 426 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 8 comments - 188204pts217comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 204 points and 217 comments. The source actually reported 614 points and 655 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 614 points · 655 comments → ·
- 189615pts139comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 615 points and 139 comments. The source actually reported 728 points and 165 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 728 points · 165 comments → ·
- 190560pts398comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 560 points and 398 comments. The source actually reported 575 points and 408 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 575 points · 408 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 14 comments - 191466pts345comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 466 points and 345 comments. The source actually reported 607 points and 449 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 607 points · 449 comments → ·
- 192456pts275comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 456 points and 275 comments. The source actually reported 761 points and 459 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 761 points · 459 comments → ·
- 193329pts287comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 329 points and 287 comments. The source actually reported 1137 points and 989 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1137 points · 989 comments → ·
- 194523pts243comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 523 points and 243 comments. The source actually reported 1049 points and 488 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1049 points · 488 comments → ·
- 195474pts284comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 474 points and 284 comments. The source actually reported 960 points and 575 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 960 points · 575 comments → ·
- 196560pts68comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 560 points and 68 comments. The source actually reported 2123 points and 259 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 2123 points · 259 comments → ·
- 1972042pts1216comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 2042 points and 1216 comments. The source actually reported 2042 points and 1216 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 2042 points · 1216 comments → ·
- 1981362pts1539comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1362 points and 1539 comments. The source actually reported 1362 points and 1539 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1362 points · 1539 comments → ·
- 199241pts29comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 241 points and 29 comments. The source actually reported 2123 points and 259 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 2123 points · 259 comments → ·
- 200193pts143comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 193 points and 143 comments. The source actually reported 607 points and 449 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 607 points · 449 comments → ·