Search
Searching all collected daily editions.
50 MATCHES · MORE AVAILABLE
Welcome. On your next visit, NEW badges highlight picks added since you last read.
- 201193pts143comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 193 points and 143 comments. The source actually reported 607 points and 449 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 607 points · 449 comments → ·
- 202156pts73comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 156 points and 73 comments. The source actually reported 1049 points and 488 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1049 points · 488 comments → ·
- 203138pts83comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 138 points and 83 comments. The source actually reported 960 points and 575 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 960 points · 575 comments → ·
- 20437pts13comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 37 points and 13 comments. The source actually reported 147 points and 53 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 147 points · 53 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 149 comments Programming.dev · 4 comments - 205158pts112comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 158 points and 112 comments. The source actually reported 575 points and 408 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 575 points · 408 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 14 comments - 206230pts433comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 230 points and 433 comments. The source actually reported 273 points and 513 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 273 points · 513 comments → ·
- 207305pts181comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 305 points and 181 comments. The source actually reported 393 points and 233 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 393 points · 233 comments → ·
- 208233pts203comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 233 points and 203 comments. The source actually reported 375 points and 326 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 375 points · 326 comments → ·
- 209302pts353comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 302 points and 353 comments. The source actually reported 348 points and 407 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 348 points · 407 comments → ·
- 210380pts281comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 380 points and 281 comments. The source actually reported 392 points and 290 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 392 points · 290 comments → ·
- 211208pts323comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 208 points and 323 comments. The source actually reported 433 points and 673 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 433 points · 673 comments → ·
- 212309pts69comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 309 points and 69 comments. The source actually reported 937 points and 209 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 937 points · 209 comments → ·
- 213332pts276comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 332 points and 276 comments. The source actually reported 505 points and 420 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 505 points · 420 comments → ·
- 214300pts179comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 300 points and 179 comments. The source actually reported 586 points and 349 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 586 points · 349 comments → ·
- 215491pts177comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 491 points and 177 comments. The source actually reported 584 points and 211 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 584 points · 211 comments → ·
- 216423pts402comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 423 points and 402 comments. The source actually reported 596 points and 566 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 596 points · 566 comments → ·
- 21772pts76comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 72 points and 76 comments. The source actually reported 89 points and 94 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 89 points · 94 comments → ·
- 218233pts264comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 233 points and 264 comments. The source actually reported 1362 points and 1539 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1362 points · 1539 comments → ·
- 2191016pts605comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1016 points and 605 comments. The source actually reported 2042 points and 1216 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 2042 points · 1216 comments → ·
- 220184pts136comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 184 points and 136 comments. The source actually reported 392 points and 290 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 392 points · 290 comments → ·
- 221130pts108comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 130 points and 108 comments. The source actually reported 505 points and 420 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 505 points · 420 comments → ·
- 222311pts242comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 311 points and 242 comments. The source actually reported 323 points and 251 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 323 points · 251 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 49 comments - 223216pts298comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 216 points and 298 comments. The source actually reported 295 points and 408 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 295 points · 408 comments → ·
- 224228pts83comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 228 points and 83 comments. The source actually reported 584 points and 211 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 584 points · 211 comments → ·
- 22536pts39comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 36 points and 39 comments. The source actually reported 89 points and 94 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 89 points · 94 comments → ·
- 226125pts119comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 125 points and 119 comments. The source actually reported 596 points and 566 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 596 points · 566 comments → ·
- 227199pts118comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 199 points and 118 comments. The source actually reported 2042 points and 1216 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 2042 points · 1216 comments → ·
- 228264pts131comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 264 points and 131 comments. The source actually reported 367 points and 182 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 367 points · 182 comments → ·
- 229215pts148comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 215 points and 148 comments. The source actually reported 361 points and 249 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 361 points · 249 comments → ·
- 230107pts15comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 107 points and 15 comments. The source actually reported 139 points and 19 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 139 points · 19 comments → ·
- 231344pts383comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 344 points and 383 comments. The source actually reported 350 points and 390 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 350 points · 390 comments → ·
- 232260pts179comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 260 points and 179 comments. The source actually reported 495 points and 341 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 495 points · 341 comments → ·
- 233304pts95comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 304 points and 95 comments. The source actually reported 556 points and 173 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 556 points · 173 comments → ·
- 234196pts150comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 196 points and 150 comments. The source actually reported 559 points and 428 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 559 points · 428 comments → ·
- 235310pts221comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 310 points and 221 comments. The source actually reported 439 points and 313 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 439 points · 313 comments → ·
- 236439pts304comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 439 points and 304 comments. The source actually reported 510 points and 353 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 510 points · 353 comments → ·
- 237418pts200comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 418 points and 200 comments. The source actually reported 596 points and 286 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 596 points · 286 comments → ·
- 238775pts559comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 775 points and 559 comments. The source actually reported 775 points and 559 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 775 points · 559 comments → ·
- 239685pts552comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 685 points and 552 comments. The source actually reported 840 points and 677 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 840 points · 677 comments → ·
- 24038pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 38 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 139 points and 19 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 139 points · 19 comments → ·
- 24182pts25comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 82 points and 25 comments. The source actually reported 556 points and 173 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 556 points · 173 comments → ·
- 242108pts41comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 108 points and 41 comments. The source actually reported 350 points and 132 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 350 points · 132 comments → ·
- 24394pts75comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 94 points and 75 comments. The source actually reported 247 points and 197 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 247 points · 197 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 14 comments - 244114pts95comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 114 points and 95 comments. The source actually reported 300 points and 249 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 300 points · 249 comments → ·
- 24591pts65comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 91 points and 65 comments. The source actually reported 439 points and 313 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 439 points · 313 comments → ·
- 24681pts90comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 81 points and 90 comments. The source actually reported 350 points and 390 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 350 points · 390 comments → ·
- 247120pts57comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 120 points and 57 comments. The source actually reported 596 points and 286 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 596 points · 286 comments → ·
- 248152pts131comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 152 points and 131 comments. The source actually reported 292 points and 251 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 292 points · 251 comments → ·
- 249107pts74comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 107 points and 74 comments. The source actually reported 510 points and 353 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 510 points · 353 comments → ·
- 250120pts133comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 120 points and 133 comments. The source actually reported 305 points and 338 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 305 points · 338 comments → ·