Search
Daily ranking · strictly above medianSearching all collected daily editions.
14 MATCHES
Welcome. On your next visit, NEW badges highlight picks added since you last read.
- 01570pts338comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 570 points and 338 comments. The source actually reported 746 points and 442 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 746 points · 442 comments → ·
Also discussed: Programming.dev · 9 comments - 02197pts117comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 197 points and 117 comments. The source actually reported 746 points and 442 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 746 points · 442 comments → ·
Also discussed: Programming.dev · 9 comments - 0394pts75comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 94 points and 75 comments. The source actually reported 247 points and 197 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 247 points · 197 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 14 comments - 04152pts131comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 152 points and 131 comments. The source actually reported 292 points and 251 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 292 points · 251 comments → ·
- 0517pts17comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 17 points and 17 comments. The source actually reported 61 points and 59 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 61 points · 59 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 47 comments - 065pts5comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 5 points and 5 comments. The source actually reported 61 points and 59 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 61 points · 59 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 47 comments - 079pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 9 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 9 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 9 points · 0 comments → ·
- 086pts0comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 6 points and 0 comments. The source actually reported 9 points and 0 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 9 points · 0 comments → ·
- 0921pts23comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 21 points and 23 comments. The source actually reported 21 points and 23 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 21 points · 23 comments → ·
- 107pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 2 comments → ·
- 1121pts23comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 21 points and 23 comments. The source actually reported 21 points and 23 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 21 points · 23 comments → ·
- 127pts2comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 7 points and 2 comments. The source actually reported 7 points and 2 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 7 points · 2 comments → ·
- 1319pts21comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 19 points and 21 comments. The source actually reported 21 points and 23 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 21 points · 23 comments → ·
- 1411pts13comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 11 points and 13 comments. The source actually reported 21 points and 23 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 21 points · 23 comments → ·