Search
Searching all collected daily editions.
50 MATCHES · MORE AVAILABLE
Welcome. On your next visit, NEW badges highlight picks added since you last read.
- 251166pts60comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 166 points and 60 comments. The source actually reported 372 points and 134 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 372 points · 134 comments → ·
- 252182pts156comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 182 points and 156 comments. The source actually reported 282 points and 241 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 282 points · 241 comments → ·
- 25397pts78comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 97 points and 78 comments. The source actually reported 840 points and 677 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 840 points · 677 comments → ·
- 254216pts71comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 216 points and 71 comments. The source actually reported 419 points and 138 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 419 points · 138 comments → ·
- 255229pts310comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 229 points and 310 comments. The source actually reported 529 points and 716 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 529 points · 716 comments → ·
- 256652pts313comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 652 points and 313 comments. The source actually reported 652 points and 313 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 652 points · 313 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 18 comments - 257255pts184comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 255 points and 184 comments. The source actually reported 775 points and 559 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 775 points · 559 comments → ·
- 258530pts237comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 530 points and 237 comments. The source actually reported 939 points and 420 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 939 points · 420 comments → ·
- 259947pts222comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 947 points and 222 comments. The source actually reported 947 points and 222 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 947 points · 222 comments → ·
- 26097pts131comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 97 points and 131 comments. The source actually reported 529 points and 716 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 529 points · 716 comments → ·
- 261100pts72comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 100 points and 72 comments. The source actually reported 775 points and 559 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 775 points · 559 comments → ·
- 262174pts92comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 174 points and 92 comments. The source actually reported 245 points and 129 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 245 points · 129 comments → ·
- 263126pts331comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 126 points and 331 comments. The source actually reported 169 points and 446 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 169 points · 446 comments → ·
- 264230pts206comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 230 points and 206 comments. The source actually reported 233 points and 209 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 233 points · 209 comments → ·
- 265279pts45comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 279 points and 45 comments. The source actually reported 339 points and 55 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 339 points · 55 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 0 comments - 266224pts257comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 224 points and 257 comments. The source actually reported 237 points and 272 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 237 points · 272 comments → ·
- 267107pts48comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 107 points and 48 comments. The source actually reported 939 points and 420 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 939 points · 420 comments → ·
- 268141pts158comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 141 points and 158 comments. The source actually reported 330 points and 370 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 330 points · 370 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 35 comments - 269297pts76comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 297 points and 76 comments. The source actually reported 373 points and 96 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 373 points · 96 comments → ·
- 270252pts160comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 252 points and 160 comments. The source actually reported 336 points and 213 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 336 points · 213 comments → ·
- 271325pts70comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 325 points and 70 comments. The source actually reported 501 points and 108 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 501 points · 108 comments → ·
- 272270pts215comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 270 points and 215 comments. The source actually reported 392 points and 312 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 392 points · 312 comments → ·
- 273215pts117comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 215 points and 117 comments. The source actually reported 503 points and 274 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 503 points · 274 comments → ·
- 274186pts89comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 186 points and 89 comments. The source actually reported 652 points and 313 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 652 points · 313 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 18 comments - 275203pts48comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 203 points and 48 comments. The source actually reported 947 points and 222 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 947 points · 222 comments → ·
- 276524pts128comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 524 points and 128 comments. The source actually reported 524 points and 128 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 524 points · 128 comments → ·
- 277174pts349comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 174 points and 349 comments. The source actually reported 423 points and 850 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 423 points · 850 comments → ·
- 278261pts430comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 261 points and 430 comments. The source actually reported 497 points and 818 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 497 points · 818 comments → ·
- 279463pts218comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 463 points and 218 comments. The source actually reported 713 points and 336 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 713 points · 336 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 5 comments - 280144pts38comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 144 points and 38 comments. The source actually reported 326 points and 86 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 326 points · 86 comments → ·
- 28194pts75comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 94 points and 75 comments. The source actually reported 392 points and 312 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 392 points · 312 comments → ·
- 28268pts137comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 68 points and 137 comments. The source actually reported 423 points and 850 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 423 points · 850 comments → ·
- 283368pts107comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 368 points and 107 comments. The source actually reported 368 points and 107 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 368 points · 107 comments → ·
- 284112pts185comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 112 points and 185 comments. The source actually reported 497 points and 818 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 497 points · 818 comments → ·
- 285298pts206comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 298 points and 206 comments. The source actually reported 319 points and 221 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 319 points · 221 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 40 comments - 28673pts28comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 73 points and 28 comments. The source actually reported 73 points and 28 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 73 points · 28 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 89 comments - 287178pts84comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 178 points and 84 comments. The source actually reported 713 points and 336 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 713 points · 336 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 5 comments - 288100pts12comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 100 points and 12 comments. The source actually reported 100 points and 12 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 100 points · 12 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 21 comments - 28989pts12comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 89 points and 12 comments. The source actually reported 133 points and 18 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 133 points · 18 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 208 comments - 290190pts46comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 190 points and 46 comments. The source actually reported 524 points and 128 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 524 points · 128 comments → ·
- 291193pts58comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 193 points and 58 comments. The source actually reported 468 points and 140 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 468 points · 140 comments → ·
- 292385pts79comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 385 points and 79 comments. The source actually reported 411 points and 84 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 411 points · 84 comments → ·
- 29359pts17comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 59 points and 17 comments. The source actually reported 141 points and 40 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 141 points · 40 comments → ·
Also discussed: Hacker News · 1 comments - 294417pts228comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 417 points and 228 comments. The source actually reported 417 points and 228 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 417 points · 228 comments → ·
- 2951705pts1199comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1705 points and 1199 comments. The source actually reported 1705 points and 1199 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1705 points · 1199 comments → ·
- 296232pts137comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 232 points and 137 comments. The source actually reported 574 points and 340 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 574 points · 340 comments → ·
- 297583pts411comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 583 points and 411 comments. The source actually reported 583 points and 411 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 583 points · 411 comments → ·
- 298814pts418comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 814 points and 418 comments. The source actually reported 814 points and 418 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 814 points · 418 comments → ·
- 2991689pts609comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 1689 points and 609 comments. The source actually reported 1689 points and 609 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 1689 points · 610 comments → ·
- 300305pts113comments
Picked · selection snapshot
Recovered after a gap. Counts at the original selection checkpoint are estimates: 305 points and 113 comments. The source actually reported 346 points and 128 comments at the observation time below. Counts between measurements are estimated. Rankings can be rebuilt as settings or evidence change.
Source batch observed: .
Last refreshed: 346 points · 128 comments → ·
Also discussed: Lobsters · 0 comments